NameCensus.

Surnames

UK surnames

Browse UK surnames from the 1881 census and modern surname records. Surname pages show counts, origin facts, historical distribution, maps, first-name pairings and census detail.

Browse by letter

#Surname1881 countModern count
1Smith422,249550,878
2Jones338,678424,930
3Williams214,615295,271
4Brown197,359260,944
5Taylor191,142251,788
6Davies152,295218,077
7Wilson137,750190,823
8Evans130,734173,080
9Thomas123,339162,356
10Johnson100,458154,078
11Roberts112,276148,206
12Walker100,304136,629
13Wright95,951131,496
14Robinson95,300129,019
15Thompson89,587128,457
16White96,053125,647
17Hughes83,772123,230
18Edwards83,319119,645
19Patel0118,049
20Green84,164116,279
21Hall88,053115,031
22Lewis78,614114,738
23Martin73,281112,807
24Wood95,380111,776
25Jackson83,594111,631
26Harris75,913111,317
27Clarke60,196108,071
28Clark90,143107,632
29Scott76,018104,222
30Turner83,267103,854
31Hill76,16599,540
32Cooper72,70899,221
33Morris66,60796,847
34Moore58,81795,984
35Ward65,29995,416
36Watson69,53993,224
37King65,11593,148
38Morgan59,52390,375
39Harrison66,20789,960
40James58,68389,879
41Anderson59,26588,616
42Young64,31288,515
43Baker65,28287,926
44Lee47,66385,294
45Mitchell60,79585,189
46Allen56,29083,171
47Phillips53,45882,805
48Khan2982,773
49Campbell50,68181,637
50Bell56,09978,858
51Davis65,75776,919
52Parker56,88376,778
53Miller53,56776,610
54Kelly30,64475,958
55Bennett49,11074,621
56Price52,36173,540
57Shaw55,02072,079
58Cook59,46772,004
59Simpson52,39171,876
60Griffiths48,95571,828
61Richardson50,85771,177
62Stewart46,99070,636
63Marshall50,20369,693
64Collins42,82968,563
65Carter50,09968,343
66Bailey44,94868,216
67Ali1467,935
68Ahmed667,405
69Gray42,72766,682
70Hussain066,659
71Singh1766,078
72Murray37,22265,751
73Murphy23,79065,378
74Adams43,95062,896
75Richards45,12062,807
76Begum061,888
77Cox44,38261,731
78Robertson50,34860,857
79Graham34,45159,219
80Ellis43,38159,075
81Wilkinson45,65357,423
82Foster40,05656,729
83Mason40,24755,226
84Russell36,59255,174
85Chapman42,45654,896
86Powell37,32153,870
87Thomson40,26553,437
88Rogers38,74553,078
89Owen35,55852,359
90Webb40,50852,040
91Reid31,58551,162
92Gibson36,37051,002
93Matthews26,04950,859
94Palmer35,15350,675
95Mills38,78850,617
96Holmes36,41550,595
97Hunt39,74050,425
98Kaur149,067
99Lloyd34,91148,856
100Knight36,75648,792

How UK surnames became family names

Most British surnames became fixed between the late medieval period and the early modern period. Before that, many people were described by a first name plus something that helped identify them locally, such as a job, a parent, a place or a personal nickname.

Those descriptions gradually hardened into inherited family names. Smith, Baker and Taylor are occupational names. Johnson, Williams and Robertson are patronymic names. Hill, Wood and York are place names. Short, Little and Armstrong began as descriptive nicknames.

What the 1881 census adds

The 1881 census gives a useful national snapshot because it records surnames at a time when industrial towns, rural counties and migration patterns were all visible in the same source.

Large counties naturally produce large totals, so a raw count is not the whole story. Frequency and index values are better for spotting where a surname stood out locally, while the total count is better for measuring scale.

Why modern surname counts differ from 1881

Modern surname totals reflect more than natural growth. They are shaped by migration, marriage, spelling changes, record keeping and the way names enter or leave the UK population over time.

A surname can be historically concentrated in one county, then become widespread by the modern period. Another name can remain strongly local for more than a century.

Using surname pages for family history

The surname pages are best read as evidence, not proof of one family line. A county, parish or modern area can show where a name was common, but it cannot show that every family with that surname came from that place.

Treat the maps, counts, origins and 1881 census tables as starting points for research. They are strongest when used together.