NameCensus.

UK surname

Acaster

In the 1881 census there were 215 people recorded with the Acaster surname, ranking it #12,249 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 332, ranked #13,706, down from #12,249 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Hull Holy Trinity, Hatfield, Fishlake, Thorne, Crowle (Eastoft) and Leeds. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include East Riding of Yorkshire and Cornwall.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Acaster is 382 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 54.4%.

1881 census count

215

Ranked #12,249

Modern count

332

2016, ranked #13,706

Peak year

1998

382 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Acaster had 215 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #12,249 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 332 in 2016, ranked #13,706.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 297 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Young Families in Industrial Towns.

Acaster surname distribution map

The map shows where the Acaster surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Acaster surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Acaster over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 111 #16,006
1861 historical 144 #15,817
1881 historical 215 #12,249
1891 historical 251 #12,729
1901 historical 287 #12,001
1911 historical 297 #11,524
1997 modern 381 #11,393
1998 modern 382 #11,779
1999 modern 380 #11,907
2000 modern 368 #12,130
2001 modern 357 #12,205
2002 modern 370 #12,121
2003 modern 351 #12,389
2004 modern 355 #12,326
2005 modern 339 #12,668
2006 modern 338 #12,779
2007 modern 332 #13,087
2008 modern 325 #13,406
2009 modern 334 #13,409
2010 modern 336 #13,613
2011 modern 335 #13,528
2012 modern 345 #13,093
2013 modern 348 #13,239
2014 modern 347 #13,350
2015 modern 340 #13,455
2016 modern 332 #13,706

Geography

Back to top

Where Acasters are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Hull Holy Trinity, Hatfield, Fishlake, Thorne, Crowle (Eastoft), Leeds, Rawmarsh, Wath-on-Dearn (Swinton) and Sheffield. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to East Riding of Yorkshire and Cornwall. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Hull Holy Trinity Yorkshire, East Riding
2 Hatfield, Fishlake, Thorne, Crowle (Eastoft) Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Leeds Yorkshire, West Riding
4 Rawmarsh, Wath-on-Dearn (Swinton) Yorkshire, West Riding
5 Sheffield Yorkshire, West Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 East Riding of Yorkshire 040 East Riding of Yorkshire
2 East Riding of Yorkshire 041 East Riding of Yorkshire
3 Cornwall 005 Cornwall
4 Cornwall 006 Cornwall
5 East Riding of Yorkshire 037 East Riding of Yorkshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Acaster

These lists show first names that appear often with the Acaster surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Acaster

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Acaster, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Young Families in Industrial Towns

Nationally, the Acaster surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Young Families in Industrial Towns, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Acaster household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods house predominantly young, UK-born individuals identifying with a White ethnic group with dependent children. Long-term disability and unpaid care are prevalent, and religious affiliations are uncommon. Housing is terraced or semi-detached and social rented sector housing is the norm. Unemployment is above the Supergroup average, and employment is principally in elementary occupations, as process plant and machine operatives, or in caring and leisure services. Educational attainment is low. The group is scattered throughout former industrial towns in the Midlands and the South Wales Valleys.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles

Group

Inner London Working Professionals

Within London, Acaster is most associated with areas classed as Inner London Working Professionals, part of Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These primarily Inner London neighbourhoods are more densely populated than the Supergroup average. Residents have a younger over-all age profile than the Supergroup as a whole, and are less likely to be owner occupiers. Full time employment is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup and multiple car ownership is uncommon. Chinese and non-EU-born European migrants are less in evidence than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

These neighbourhoods house people of all ages, predominantly of White British or European extraction. Resident turnover is low. Religious affiliation is less common than average and tends to be Christian if expressed. Homeownership, typically of terraced houses, is common but use of the social rented sector is not. Employment is typically in professional, managerial and associate professional or technical occupations. There are few full-time students. Level 4 qualifications are common. More households lack dependent children than have them which, considered alongside low levels of crowding and over-all age structure, indicates that many households may be post child-rearing and in late middle age. Incidence of disability is low, as is residence in communal establishments.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Acaster is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Acaster falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Acaster is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Acaster, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Acaster families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Acaster surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 176 Acasters recorded in 1881 and an index of 8.47x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 176 8.47x
Sussex 10 2.83x
Lincolnshire 9 2.68x
Oxfordshire 6 4.63x
Cambridgeshire 5 3.76x
Durham 5 0.80x
Lancashire 2 0.08x
Leicestershire 1 0.43x
Norfolk 1 0.31x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Hook in Yorkshire leads with 24 Acasters recorded in 1881 and an index of 525.16x.

Place Total Index
Hook 24 525.16x
Sheffield 18 27.21x
Thorne 17 658.91x
Brighton 10 14.02x
Swinton In Rotherham 10 181.82x
Garforth 9 566.04x
Leeds 9 7.67x
Sculcoates 9 27.31x
Selby 8 184.33x
Great Grimsby 7 32.89x
Huddersfield 7 23.12x
Clifton In York 6 137.93x
Holy Trinity 6 12.00x
North Hinksey 6 3000.00x
Brightside Bierlow 5 12.27x
Hunslet 5 15.43x
Wisbech St Peter 5 75.08x
Attercliffe Cum Darnall 4 20.66x
Ecclesall Bierlow 4 9.46x
Rotherham 4 34.13x
Wortley In Bramley 4 24.30x
Goole 3 86.21x
Greasbrough 3 109.49x
Hartlepool 3 33.82x
Heeley 3 47.47x
Howden 3 212.77x
Nether Hallam 3 10.67x
Bishopwearmouth 2 3.73x
Catcliffe 2 689.66x
Kippax 2 109.29x
North Dalton 2 571.43x
Scarborough 2 10.59x
Ardwick 1 4.45x
Beaghall 1 416.67x
Charnock Richard 1 204.08x
Clee With Weelsby 1 13.62x
Hessle In Sculcoates 1 54.64x
Hipperholme Cum 1 10.95x
Loughborough 1 9.48x
North Somercotes 1 113.64x
Portington Cavil 1 1428.57x
Upwell 1 66.67x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Acaster surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Acaster surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Thomas 14
William 12
John 9
Joseph 9
George 7
Robert 6
Charles 5
Albert 3
James 3
Walter 3
Wm. 3
Amos 2
Benjamin 2
David 2
Edwin 2
Ernest 2
Henry 2
Herbert 2
Tom 2
Alexander 1
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Chas 1
Clement 1
Edward 1
Frank 1
Fred 1
Frederick 1
Fredk. 1
Harry 1
Joshua 1
Ralph 1
Samuel 1
Stephen 1
Thos. 1
Timothy 1

FAQ

Acaster surname: questions and answers

How common was the Acaster surname in 1881?

In 1881, 215 people were recorded with the Acaster surname. That placed it at #12,249 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Acaster surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 332 in 2016. That gives Acaster a modern rank of #13,706.

What does the Acaster map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Acaster bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.