NameCensus.

UK surname

Altoft

In the 1881 census there were 151 people recorded with the Altoft surname, ranking it #15,419 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 332, ranked #13,706, up from #15,419 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Hull Holy Trinity, Leeds and Winterton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include North Lincolnshire, West Lindsey and North East Lincolnshire.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Altoft is 377 in 2000. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 119.9%.

1881 census count

151

Ranked #15,419

Modern count

332

2016, ranked #13,706

Peak year

2000

377 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Altoft had 151 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,419 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 332 in 2016, ranked #13,706.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 251 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Altoft surname distribution map

The map shows where the Altoft surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Altoft surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Altoft over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 65 #21,747
1861 historical 110 #19,562
1881 historical 151 #15,419
1891 historical 195 #15,211
1901 historical 251 #13,102
1911 historical 244 #13,127
1997 modern 352 #12,117
1998 modern 358 #12,349
1999 modern 349 #12,638
2000 modern 377 #11,903
2001 modern 360 #12,127
2002 modern 368 #12,168
2003 modern 339 #12,714
2004 modern 339 #12,744
2005 modern 330 #12,939
2006 modern 335 #12,883
2007 modern 343 #12,773
2008 modern 349 #12,723
2009 modern 355 #12,832
2010 modern 351 #13,220
2011 modern 347 #13,167
2012 modern 350 #12,965
2013 modern 346 #13,291
2014 modern 349 #13,293
2015 modern 340 #13,455
2016 modern 332 #13,706

Geography

Back to top

Where Altofts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Hull Holy Trinity, Leeds, Winterton, Bottesford and Winteringham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to North Lincolnshire, West Lindsey and North East Lincolnshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Hull Holy Trinity Yorkshire, East Riding
2 Leeds Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Winterton Lincolnshire
4 Bottesford Lincolnshire
5 Winteringham Lincolnshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 North Lincolnshire 001 North Lincolnshire
2 West Lindsey 002 West Lindsey
3 North Lincolnshire 004 North Lincolnshire
4 North East Lincolnshire 001 North East Lincolnshire
5 North Lincolnshire 011 North Lincolnshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Altoft

These lists show first names that appear often with the Altoft surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Altoft

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Altoft, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Altoft surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Altoft household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Altoft is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Altoft is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Altoft falls in decile 3 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

3
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Altoft is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Altoft, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Altoft families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Altoft surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lincolnshire leads with 113 Altofts recorded in 1881 and an index of 47.98x.

County Total Index
Lincolnshire 113 47.98x
Yorkshire 18 1.23x
Derbyshire 6 2.60x
Lancashire 4 0.23x
Buckinghamshire 3 3.37x
Midlothian 3 1.52x
Cheshire 2 0.62x
Nottinghamshire 2 1.01x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Thornton Curtis in Lincolnshire leads with 10 Altofts recorded in 1881 and an index of 4166.67x.

Place Total Index
Thornton Curtis 10 4166.67x
Bigby 9 5000.00x
Broughton 9 1363.64x
Sculcoates 9 38.89x
Winteringham 9 2647.06x
Baslow With Bubnell 6 1395.35x
Winterton 6 740.74x
Holy Trinity 5 14.24x
Messingham 5 877.19x
Tathwell 5 2380.95x
Wickenby 5 3571.43x
Wrawby 5 781.25x
Bottesford 4 2352.94x
Brocklesby 4 3076.92x
Eastoft 4 1290.32x
Frodingham 4 476.19x
Redbourne 4 2105.26x
Barnetby Le Wold 3 697.67x
Epworth 3 272.73x
Linslade 3 344.83x
South Leith 3 13.51x
Altrincham 2 35.21x
Amcotts 2 1000.00x
Ingoldmells 2 1666.67x
Keelby 2 540.54x
Leake 2 185.19x
Limber Magna 2 800.00x
Tonge 2 54.50x
Ulceby 2 350.88x
Worksop 2 33.96x
Ashby 1 135.14x
Boston 1 13.99x
Bramley In Bramley 1 17.89x
Cadney 1 434.78x
Elsham 1 400.00x
Failsworth 1 25.00x
Great Grimsby 1 6.69x
Hogsthorpe 1 277.78x
Huddersfield 1 4.70x
Leeds 1 1.21x
Manchester 1 1.27x
Roxby Cum Risby 1 476.19x
South Ferriby 1 270.27x
South Kelsey 1 322.58x
Tetford 1 333.33x
Walton In Wakefield 1 322.58x
Withcall 1 833.33x
Yaddlethorpe 1 1250.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Altoft surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 14
Annie 7
Sarah 7
Ann 6
Elizabeth 6
Jane 6
Alice 3
Fanny 3
Emma 2
Harriet 2
Harriett 2
Lucy 2
E. 1
Edith 1
Elen 1
Eliza 1
Jemmima 1
Kate 1
Maria 1
Martha 1
Susanna 1
Susannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Altoft surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 12
William 12
George 9
Thomas 8
Charles 7
James 7
Henry 4
Joseph 4
Benjamin 2
Frederick 2
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
David 1
Edgar 1
Edward 1
Frank 1
Robt. 1
Thos. 1
Tom 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Altoft surname: questions and answers

How common was the Altoft surname in 1881?

In 1881, 151 people were recorded with the Altoft surname. That placed it at #15,419 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Altoft surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 332 in 2016. That gives Altoft a modern rank of #13,706.

What does the Altoft map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Altoft bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.