NameCensus.

UK surname

Aucott

In the 1881 census there were 149 people recorded with the Aucott surname, ranking it #15,551 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 501, ranked #9,974, up from #15,551 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Tamworth, Hinckley (incl. Hydes Pastures) and Nuneaton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Nuneaton and Bedworth and North Warwickshire.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Aucott is 565 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 236.2%.

1881 census count

149

Ranked #15,551

Modern count

501

2016, ranked #9,974

Peak year

1999

565 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Aucott had 149 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,551 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 501 in 2016, ranked #9,974.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 377 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Inner Suburbs and Small Town Living.

Aucott surname distribution map

The map shows where the Aucott surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Aucott surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Aucott over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 100 #17,164
1861 historical 122 #18,036
1881 historical 149 #15,551
1891 historical 168 #16,937
1901 historical 377 #9,876
1911 historical 228 #13,759
1997 modern 546 #8,712
1998 modern 558 #8,824
1999 modern 565 #8,787
2000 modern 557 #8,860
2001 modern 545 #8,859
2002 modern 546 #9,029
2003 modern 535 #9,018
2004 modern 545 #8,919
2005 modern 532 #9,019
2006 modern 516 #9,258
2007 modern 520 #9,284
2008 modern 519 #9,372
2009 modern 523 #9,530
2010 modern 540 #9,491
2011 modern 529 #9,555
2012 modern 515 #9,663
2013 modern 520 #9,734
2014 modern 515 #9,872
2015 modern 516 #9,789
2016 modern 501 #9,974

Geography

Back to top

Where Aucotts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Tamworth, Hinckley (incl. Hydes Pastures), Nuneaton, Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars and Mancetter. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Nuneaton and Bedworth and North Warwickshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Tamworth Staffordshire
2 Hinckley (incl. Hydes Pastures) Leicestershire
3 Nuneaton Warwickshire
4 Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars Leicestershire
5 Mancetter Warwickshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Nuneaton and Bedworth 006 Nuneaton and Bedworth
2 North Warwickshire 002 North Warwickshire
3 Nuneaton and Bedworth 009 Nuneaton and Bedworth
4 Nuneaton and Bedworth 001 Nuneaton and Bedworth
5 Nuneaton and Bedworth 008 Nuneaton and Bedworth

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Aucott

These lists show first names that appear often with the Aucott surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Aucott

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Aucott, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Inner Suburbs and Small Town Living

Nationally, the Aucott surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Inner Suburbs and Small Town Living, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Aucott household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Families with resident dependent children (but not students) are common. Established family groups and White ethnicity predominate, as do individuals born in the UK. They are more likely than the Supergroup average to have been resident in their terraced, semi-detached, or detached houses for more than one year. Levels of multiple car ownership are high. Properties are owned and typically have surplus living space. Associate professionals and administrative occupations are prevalent, and parents are likely to be in middle age or approaching retirement. Educational attainment is above the Supergroup average. Scattered developments and concentrations are found in many small towns.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Aucott is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Aucott is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Aucott falls in decile 8 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

8
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Aucott is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Aucott, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Aucott families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Aucott surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Warwickshire leads with 46 Aucotts recorded in 1881 and an index of 12.55x.

County Total Index
Warwickshire 46 12.55x
Leicestershire 44 27.31x
Staffordshire 19 3.87x
Derbyshire 18 7.91x
Kent 6 1.21x
Lanarkshire 6 1.28x
Worcestershire 6 3.16x
Cambridgeshire 3 3.26x
Oxfordshire 1 1.11x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Hartshill in Warwickshire leads with 17 Aucotts recorded in 1881 and an index of 6296.30x.

Place Total Index
Hartshill 17 6296.30x
Leicester St Nicholas 17 1868.13x
Hinckley 16 418.85x
Wilnecote 13 1238.10x
Wednesbury 11 89.72x
Nuneaton 8 188.24x
Leicester St Mary 7 53.76x
Barony 6 5.04x
Dudley 6 26.01x
Margate St John Baptist 6 66.08x
Stapenhill 6 176.99x
Tamworth 6 229.01x
Derby St Alkmund 5 73.31x
Lullington 5 1351.35x
Aston 3 2.97x
Benwick 3 731.71x
Mancetter 3 285.71x
Melbourne 2 128.21x
Barwell 1 117.65x
Burton Hastings 1 1250.00x
Fazeley 1 112.36x
Handsworth 1 8.27x
Leicester St Margaret 1 2.54x
Lutterworth 1 102.04x
Market Bosworth 1 172.41x
Thame 1 61.35x
Wolvey 1 256.41x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Aucott surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 16
Sarah 7
Catherine 5
Elizabeth 4
Ellen 4
Emma 4
Annie 3
Eliza 3
Maria 3
Laura 2
Rhoda 2
Ada 1
Alice 1
Ann 1
Bertha 1
Betsey 1
Charlotte 1
Emily 1
Fanny 1
Florence 1
Harriett 1
Jemima 1
Lisetta 1
Lissetta 1
Lizzie 1
Lottie 1
Louisa 1
Martha 1
Matilda 1
Rebecca 1
Rosina 1
Sophia 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Aucott surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Aucott surname: questions and answers

How common was the Aucott surname in 1881?

In 1881, 149 people were recorded with the Aucott surname. That placed it at #15,551 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Aucott surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 501 in 2016. That gives Aucott a modern rank of #9,974.

What does the Aucott map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Aucott bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.