NameCensus.

UK surname

Beautyman

In the 1881 census there were 85 people recorded with the Beautyman surname, ranking it #21,573 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 136, ranked #25,377, down from #21,573 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Hull Holy Trinity, Newcastle All Saints and Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon). In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Broxbourne, North Tyneside and Fenland.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Beautyman is 154 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 60.0%.

1881 census count

85

Ranked #21,573

Modern count

136

2016, ranked #25,377

Peak year

1999

154 bearers

Map years

5

1901 to 2016

Key insights

  • Beautyman had 85 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #21,573 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 136 in 2016, ranked #25,377.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 133 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Ageing Communities.

Beautyman surname distribution map

The map shows where the Beautyman surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Beautyman surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Beautyman over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 49 #24,448
1861 historical 63 #25,901
1881 historical 85 #21,573
1891 historical 99 #24,200
1901 historical 122 #20,344
1911 historical 133 #19,214
1997 modern 146 #21,494
1998 modern 153 #21,387
1999 modern 154 #21,455
2000 modern 147 #22,081
2001 modern 142 #22,234
2002 modern 147 #22,197
2003 modern 135 #23,155
2004 modern 135 #23,326
2005 modern 130 #23,848
2006 modern 128 #24,267
2007 modern 124 #25,086
2008 modern 126 #25,131
2009 modern 131 #25,056
2010 modern 133 #25,379
2011 modern 124 #26,367
2012 modern 126 #26,148
2013 modern 136 #25,252
2014 modern 139 #25,093
2015 modern 141 #24,723
2016 modern 136 #25,377

Geography

Back to top

Where Beautymans are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Hull Holy Trinity, Newcastle All Saints, Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon), St Anne Limehouse and London parishes. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Broxbourne, North Tyneside, Fenland, Hammersmith and Fulham and Newham. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Hull Holy Trinity Yorkshire, East Riding
2 Newcastle All Saints Northumberland
3 Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon) Northumberland
4 St Anne Limehouse London (East Districts)
5 London parishes London 2

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Broxbourne 005 Broxbourne
2 North Tyneside 004 North Tyneside
3 Fenland 003 Fenland
4 Hammersmith and Fulham 009 Hammersmith and Fulham
5 Newham 023 Newham

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Beautyman

These lists show first names that appear often with the Beautyman surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Beautyman

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Beautyman, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Ageing Communities

Nationally, the Beautyman surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Ageing Communities, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Beautyman household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many residents are of normal retirement age or above and live in communal establishments, and there are few dependent children. The dominant property type is a mix of retirement flats and detached houses. Those in work are likely to be employed in managerial and professional occupations, and many residents are educated to degree level. Levels of owner occupation are high, but the private rental sector is also present. Rural locations predominate.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Beautyman is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Beautyman is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Beautyman falls in decile 4 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

4
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Beautyman is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Beautyman, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Beautyman families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Beautyman surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 34 Beautymans recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.04x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 34 4.04x
Northumberland 27 21.38x
Essex 10 5.97x
Middlesex 7 0.82x
Durham 4 1.58x
Royal Navy 2 19.78x
Cumberland 1 1.37x
Staffordshire 1 0.35x
Worcestershire 1 0.90x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Holy Trinity in Yorkshire leads with 21 Beautymans recorded in 1881 and an index of 103.81x.

Place Total Index
Holy Trinity 21 103.81x
Byker 12 192.31x
Holy Trinity St Mary 8 625.00x
Wallsend 7 175.00x
West Ham 7 18.92x
Limehouse London 5 53.65x
Tynemouth 5 73.96x
East Ham 3 96.46x
Beverley St Martin 2 142.86x
Gateshead 2 10.58x
Newcastle On Tyne All Sts 2 26.53x
Royal Navy 2 23.15x
Southwick 2 83.68x
St Mary 2 357.14x
Alnwick 1 46.08x
Alston 1 74.07x
Lower Mitton 1 102.04x
Poplar London 1 6.24x
Sculcoates 1 7.50x
Whitechapel London 1 11.95x
Wolverhampton 1 4.54x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Beautyman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 6
Jane 4
Sarah 4
Ann 3
Emma 3
Harriet 3
Ada 2
Alice 2
Elizabeth 2
Hannah 2
Maria 2
Amelia 1
Annie 1
Dorothy 1
Louisa 1
Maggie 1
Margaret 1
Rose 1
Sar.Ann 1
Sophia 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Beautyman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 6
William 6
Thomas 5
Jacob 3
Charles 2
Cuthbert 2
Frank 2
George 2
Harry 2
Henry 2
Alfred 1
Benj. 1
Benjamin 1
Edward 1
Geo.T. 1
Geo.W. 1
Miles 1
Milles 1
Percival 1
Reuben 1
Robert 1
Samuel 1
Thos. 1

FAQ

Beautyman surname: questions and answers

How common was the Beautyman surname in 1881?

In 1881, 85 people were recorded with the Beautyman surname. That placed it at #21,573 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Beautyman surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 136 in 2016. That gives Beautyman a modern rank of #25,377.

What does the Beautyman map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Beautyman bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.