NameCensus.

UK surname

Blant

In the 1881 census there were 93 people recorded with the Blant surname, ranking it #20,593 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 138, ranked #25,127, down from #20,593 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Burton-on-Trent, Wingfield, North and Alfreton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Broxtowe, Bolsover and Gedling.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Blant is 220 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 48.4%.

1881 census count

93

Ranked #20,593

Modern count

138

2016, ranked #25,127

Peak year

1861

220 bearers

Map years

8

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Blant had 93 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #20,593 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 138 in 2016, ranked #25,127.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 220 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Blant surname distribution map

The map shows where the Blant surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Blant surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Blant over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 116 #15,545
1861 historical 220 #11,076
1881 historical 93 #20,593
1891 historical 204 #14,702
1901 historical 140 #18,795
1911 historical 214 #14,333
1997 modern 152 #20,948
1998 modern 153 #21,387
1999 modern 152 #21,636
2000 modern 153 #21,520
2001 modern 147 #21,756
2002 modern 144 #22,501
2003 modern 141 #22,549
2004 modern 134 #23,425
2005 modern 134 #23,406
2006 modern 136 #23,378
2007 modern 134 #23,931
2008 modern 133 #24,350
2009 modern 134 #24,711
2010 modern 135 #25,127
2011 modern 136 #24,819
2012 modern 141 #24,258
2013 modern 140 #24,779
2014 modern 141 #24,855
2015 modern 139 #24,956
2016 modern 138 #25,127

Geography

Back to top

Where Blants are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Burton-on-Trent, Wingfield, North, Alfreton, Whittlesey St Mary and St Andrew, Standground (Stilton & Peterborough, Northamptonshire) and Mansfield. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Broxtowe, Bolsover, Gedling and East Staffordshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Burton-on-Trent Staffordshire
2 Wingfield, North Derbyshire
3 Alfreton Derbyshire
4 Whittlesey St Mary and St Andrew, Standground (Stilton & Peterborough, Northamptonshire) Cambridgeshire
5 Mansfield Nottinghamshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Broxtowe 016 Broxtowe
2 Bolsover 004 Bolsover
3 Bolsover 005 Bolsover
4 Gedling 001 Gedling
5 East Staffordshire 001 East Staffordshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Blant

These lists show first names that appear often with the Blant surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Blant

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Blant, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Blant surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Blant household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Blant is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Blant is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Blant falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Blant is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Blant, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Blant families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Blant surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Derbyshire leads with 32 Blants recorded in 1881 and an index of 22.53x.

County Total Index
Derbyshire 32 22.53x
Staffordshire 28 9.14x
Nottinghamshire 13 10.63x
Lancashire 6 0.56x
Leicestershire 4 3.98x
Norfolk 4 2.87x
Yorkshire 2 0.22x
Cheshire 1 0.50x
Essex 1 0.56x
Middlesex 1 0.11x
Warwickshire 1 0.44x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Claylane in Derbyshire leads with 26 Blants recorded in 1881 and an index of 1319.80x.

Place Total Index
Claylane 26 1319.80x
Burton Upon Trent 19 265.36x
Skegby 9 1200.00x
Liverpool 6 9.18x
Church Broughton 5 2777.78x
Tamworth 5 304.88x
Burton Extra 4 227.27x
Weasenham St Peter 4 5000.00x
Eastwood 3 275.23x
Leicester St Margaret 2 8.15x
Blackwell 1 142.86x
Edgbaston 1 14.10x
Kimberworth 1 20.04x
Leicester Black Friars 1 153.85x
Nottingham St Mary 1 3.16x
Oxton 1 88.50x
Swinton In Rotherham 1 42.02x
Twyford 1 769.23x
West Ham 1 2.53x
Whitechapel London 1 11.19x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Blant surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 7
Hannah 5
Mary 5
Ellen 4
Fanny 4
Annie 2
Ada 1
Agness 1
Alice 1
Ann 1
Anna 1
Eliza 1
Elizabeth 1
Elizh. 1
Emma 1
Harriet 1
Harriott 1
Kate 1
Louisa 1
Silvey 1
Susanna 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Blant surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 9
Thomas 6
James 4
John 4
George 3
Joseph 3
Robert 3
Samuel 3
Henry 2
Abraham 1
Absolam 1
Alfred 1
Anthony 1
Arthur 1
Charles 1
Fred 1
Isaac 1
Lewis 1
Sydney 1
Theodore 1
Tom 1
Walter 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Blant households.

FAQ

Blant surname: questions and answers

How common was the Blant surname in 1881?

In 1881, 93 people were recorded with the Blant surname. That placed it at #20,593 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Blant surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 138 in 2016. That gives Blant a modern rank of #25,127.

What does the Blant map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Blant bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.