UK surname
In the 1881 census there were 114 people recorded with the Booley surname, ranking it #18,324 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 81, ranked #32,971, down from #18,324 in 1881.
The strongest historical links point to St Leonard Shoreditch, London parishes and St James Clerkenwell. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.
Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Booley is 199 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 28.9%.
1881 census count
114
Ranked #18,324
Modern count
81
2016, ranked #32,971
Peak year
1861
199 bearers
Map years
5
1861 to 1911
Key insights
Map
Back to topThe map shows where the Booley surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.
Distribution map
Booley surname density by area, 1881 census.
Timeline
Back to topThe table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.
| Year | Period | Count | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | historical | 83 | #19,181 |
| 1861 | historical | 199 | #12,062 |
| 1881 | historical | 114 | #18,324 |
| 1891 | historical | 191 | #15,437 |
| 1901 | historical | 116 | #20,933 |
| 1911 | historical | 137 | #18,880 |
| 1997 | modern | 88 | #28,611 |
| 1998 | modern | 91 | #28,806 |
| 1999 | modern | 88 | #29,287 |
| 2000 | modern | 81 | #30,036 |
| 2001 | modern | 80 | #29,945 |
| 2002 | modern | 73 | #31,159 |
| 2003 | modern | 81 | #30,311 |
| 2004 | modern | 80 | #30,679 |
| 2005 | modern | 75 | #31,400 |
| 2006 | modern | 80 | #31,149 |
| 2007 | modern | 75 | #32,079 |
| 2008 | modern | 77 | #32,181 |
| 2009 | modern | 74 | #32,835 |
| 2010 | modern | 78 | #32,848 |
| 2011 | modern | 77 | #32,909 |
| 2012 | modern | 78 | #33,044 |
| 2013 | modern | 83 | #32,813 |
| 2014 | modern | 83 | #32,910 |
| 2015 | modern | 80 | #33,052 |
| 2016 | modern | 81 | #32,971 |
Geography
Back to topHistorical parish links are strongest around St Leonard Shoreditch, London parishes, St James Clerkenwell, Manchester and Whitford. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.
The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.
| Rank | Parish | Area |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | St Leonard Shoreditch | London (East Districts) |
| 2 | London parishes | London 3 |
| 3 | St James Clerkenwell | London (Central Districts) |
| 4 | Manchester | Lancashire |
| 5 | Whitford | Flintshire |
| Rank | Area | District |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No data | No data |
Forenames
Back to topThese lists show first names that appear often with the Booley surname in historical and recent records.
Recent female names
Recent male names
Modern profile
Back to topModern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Booley, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.
These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.
The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.
UK neighbourhood type
Supergroup
No data
Group
No data
Nationally, the Booley surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Booley household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.
London neighbourhood type
Supergroup
No data
Group
No data
Within London, Booley is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.
Broadband speed
The modern neighbourhood pattern for Booley is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.
Area snapshot
This describes the area pattern most associated with Booley, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.
1881 census detail
Back to topThese tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Booley surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.
Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Flintshire leads with 24 Booleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 80.29x.
| County | Total | Index |
|---|---|---|
| Flintshire | 24 | 80.29x |
| Middlesex | 21 | 1.89x |
| Lancashire | 19 | 1.44x |
| Lincolnshire | 19 | 10.69x |
| Yorkshire | 10 | 0.91x |
| Kent | 9 | 2.37x |
| Cheshire | 6 | 2.44x |
| Glamorgan | 3 | 1.55x |
| Denbighshire | 1 | 2.38x |
| Leicestershire | 1 | 0.81x |
| Somerset | 1 | 0.56x |
Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Holywell in Flintshire leads with 11 Booleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 293.33x.
| Place | Total | Index |
|---|---|---|
| Holywell | 11 | 293.33x |
| Salford | 8 | 20.62x |
| Whitford | 8 | 516.13x |
| Clerkenwell London | 7 | 26.67x |
| Bootle Cum Linacre | 6 | 57.25x |
| Poplar London | 6 | 28.59x |
| Hawarden Saltney | 5 | 1190.48x |
| Islington London | 5 | 4.64x |
| Osbournby | 5 | 2631.58x |
| Brightside Bierlow | 4 | 18.51x |
| Chatham | 4 | 38.31x |
| Grange Gillingham | 4 | 2352.94x |
| Little Steeping | 4 | 4000.00x |
| Manchester | 4 | 6.74x |
| Llanrhidian Higher | 3 | 243.90x |
| Monks Coppenhall | 3 | 32.40x |
| Nether Hallam | 3 | 20.12x |
| Saddleworth | 3 | 35.29x |
| Birkenhead | 2 | 10.22x |
| Frampton | 2 | 588.24x |
| Gosberton | 2 | 253.16x |
| Hacconby | 2 | 1250.00x |
| Bath St James | 1 | 53.48x |
| Chelsea London | 1 | 2.99x |
| Denbigh | 1 | 59.17x |
| Gillingham | 1 | 12.79x |
| Holbeach | 1 | 50.51x |
| Ibstock | 1 | 111.11x |
| Mile End Old Town London | 1 | 4.23x |
| Oldham | 1 | 2.35x |
| Paddington London | 1 | 2.45x |
| Quadring | 1 | 294.12x |
| Stockport | 1 | 7.92x |
| Surfleet | 1 | 270.27x |
| Wigtoft | 1 | 384.62x |
These are the female first names most often recorded with the Booley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.
| Name | Count |
|---|---|
| Mary | 11 |
| Sarah | 9 |
| Elizabeth | 5 |
| Jane | 4 |
| Agnes | 2 |
| Alice | 2 |
| Fanny | 2 |
| Louisa | 2 |
| Amy | 1 |
| Ann | 1 |
| Anne | 1 |
| Betsy | 1 |
| Catherine | 1 |
| Charlotte | 1 |
| Elizabet | 1 |
| Elizth. | 1 |
| Ellen | 1 |
| Emily | 1 |
| Emma | 1 |
| Hannah | 1 |
| Henrietta | 1 |
| Isabella | 1 |
| Lizzie | 1 |
| Lydia | 1 |
| Margeret | 1 |
| Margt. | 1 |
| Martha | 1 |
| Matilda | 1 |
| Maud | 1 |
| Minnie | 1 |
| Monica | 1 |
| Monricha | 1 |
| Nelly | 1 |
| Rachel | 1 |
| Rosiana | 1 |
These are the male first names most often recorded with the Booley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.
Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Booley households.
FAQ
In 1881, 114 people were recorded with the Booley surname. That placed it at #18,324 in the surname rankings for that year.
The latest modern count shown here is 81 in 2016. That gives Booley a modern rank of #32,971.
The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Booley bearers relative to the surrounding population.
The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.