NameCensus.

UK surname

Clayforth

In the 1881 census there were 63 people recorded with the Clayforth surname, ranking it #24,711 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 81, ranked #32,971, down from #24,711 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Calverley, Collingham, Micklethwaite Grange, Bardsey (Wothersome) and Spofforth. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Wakefield and Leeds.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Clayforth is 113 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 28.6%.

1881 census count

63

Ranked #24,711

Modern count

81

2016, ranked #32,971

Peak year

1911

113 bearers

Map years

2

1911 to 1998

Key insights

  • Clayforth had 63 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #24,711 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 81 in 2016, ranked #32,971.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 113 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Clayforth surname distribution map

The map shows where the Clayforth surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Clayforth surname density by area, 1998 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Clayforth over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 33 #27,390
1861 historical 49 #27,768
1881 historical 63 #24,711
1891 historical 64 #28,781
1901 historical 71 #26,277
1911 historical 113 #21,168
1997 modern 93 #27,932
1998 modern 101 #27,479
1999 modern 98 #28,050
2000 modern 88 #29,284
2001 modern 89 #28,932
2002 modern 88 #29,534
2003 modern 82 #30,206
2004 modern 91 #29,345
2005 modern 83 #30,486
2006 modern 83 #30,808
2007 modern 83 #31,183
2008 modern 81 #31,713
2009 modern 83 #31,950
2010 modern 81 #32,582
2011 modern 85 #32,127
2012 modern 78 #33,044
2013 modern 78 #33,215
2014 modern 79 #33,205
2015 modern 81 #32,975
2016 modern 81 #32,971

Geography

Back to top

Where Clayforths are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Calverley, Collingham, Micklethwaite Grange, Bardsey (Wothersome), Spofforth, Bradford and Sherburn. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Wakefield and Leeds. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Calverley Yorkshire, West Riding
2 Collingham, Micklethwaite Grange, Bardsey (Wothersome) Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Spofforth Yorkshire, West Riding
4 Bradford Yorkshire, West Riding
5 Sherburn Yorkshire, West Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Wakefield 003 Wakefield
2 Leeds 033 Leeds
3 Wakefield 001 Wakefield
4 Wakefield 027 Wakefield
5 Leeds 045 Leeds

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Clayforth

These lists show first names that appear often with the Clayforth surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Clayforth

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Clayforth, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Clayforth surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Clayforth household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Clayforth is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Clayforth is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Clayforth falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Clayforth is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Clayforth, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Clayforth families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Clayforth surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 59 Clayforths recorded in 1881 and an index of 9.69x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 59 9.69x
Derbyshire 3 3.12x
Hampshire 1 0.79x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Leeds in Yorkshire leads with 12 Clayforths recorded in 1881 and an index of 34.90x.

Place Total Index
Leeds 12 34.90x
Idle 8 283.69x
Wetherby 8 2000.00x
Doncaster 6 134.83x
Scarcroft 4 6666.67x
Bilton Cum Harrogate 3 144.23x
Chapel En Le Frith 3 340.91x
Sheffield 3 15.48x
Clifton In York 2 157.48x
Feliskirk 2 10000.00x
Pocklington 2 350.88x
Thorner 2 1000.00x
Aldershot 1 23.70x
Barwick In Elmet 1 212.77x
Bradford 1 6.78x
Church Fenton 1 909.09x
Kelfield 1 1428.57x
Mirfield 1 29.94x
Normanton 1 54.64x
Wortley In Bramley 1 20.75x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Clayforth surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Hannah 4
Mary 4
Alice 2
Sarah 2
Ada 1
Ann 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Eliza 1
Elizabeth 1
Emma 1
Eva 1
Faith 1
Gertrude 1
Harriett 1
Jane 1
Ruth 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Clayforth surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Henry 7
John 5
William 5
Charles 4
George 4
Robert 3
Benjamin 2
Arthur 1
Atkinson 1
Edward 1
Ernest 1
Geo.E. 1
Herbert 1
James 1
Thomas 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Clayforth households.

FAQ

Clayforth surname: questions and answers

How common was the Clayforth surname in 1881?

In 1881, 63 people were recorded with the Clayforth surname. That placed it at #24,711 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Clayforth surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 81 in 2016. That gives Clayforth a modern rank of #32,971.

What does the Clayforth map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Clayforth bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.