NameCensus.

UK surname

Conquer

In the 1881 census there were 88 people recorded with the Conquer surname, ranking it #21,211 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 156, ranked #23,098, down from #21,211 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Edmonton, Haddington and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include The Calders, Coventry and Wokingham.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Conquer is 169 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 77.3%.

1881 census count

88

Ranked #21,211

Modern count

156

2016, ranked #23,098

Peak year

1998

169 bearers

Map years

5

1891 to 2016

Key insights

  • Conquer had 88 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #21,211 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 156 in 2016, ranked #23,098.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 127 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Legacy and Demographically Mixed Communities.

Conquer surname distribution map

The map shows where the Conquer surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Conquer surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Conquer over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 43 #25,518
1861 historical 77 #23,975
1881 historical 88 #21,211
1891 historical 103 #23,558
1901 historical 127 #19,893
1911 historical 90 #23,797
1997 modern 156 #20,593
1998 modern 169 #20,104
1999 modern 166 #20,458
2000 modern 152 #21,603
2001 modern 147 #21,756
2002 modern 153 #21,609
2003 modern 152 #21,486
2004 modern 151 #21,720
2005 modern 149 #21,866
2006 modern 159 #21,148
2007 modern 154 #21,804
2008 modern 152 #22,225
2009 modern 157 #22,271
2010 modern 151 #23,377
2011 modern 146 #23,736
2012 modern 151 #23,166
2013 modern 159 #22,706
2014 modern 155 #23,333
2015 modern 158 #22,913
2016 modern 156 #23,098

Geography

Back to top

Where Conquers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Edmonton, Haddington, London parishes, Edinburgh and Brighton. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to The Calders, Coventry, Wokingham, Cumnock North and Bingham, Magdalene and The Christians. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Edmonton Middlesex (Exclusive Of London Districts)
2 Haddington Haddington
3 London parishes London 3
4 Edinburgh Edinburgh
5 Brighton Sussex

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 The Calders City of Edinburgh
2 Coventry 027 Coventry
3 Wokingham 012 Wokingham
4 Cumnock North East Ayrshire
5 Bingham, Magdalene and The Christians City of Edinburgh

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Conquer

These lists show first names that appear often with the Conquer surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Conquer

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Conquer, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Legacy Communities

Group

Legacy and Demographically Mixed Communities

Nationally, the Conquer surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Legacy and Demographically Mixed Communities, within Legacy Communities. This does not mean every Conquer household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Households in these areas often include divorced or separated parents and commonly include children and young adults. The age structure is heavily skewed towards the most advanced age groups. Individuals identifying as members of ethnic minorities are not present in large numbers. Flats predominate, with some terraced, semi-detached, and detached units. Multiple car ownership is low, and housing is predominantly in the private and social rented sectors. Employment is less skewed towards traditional routine industrial occupations. Levels of educational attainment are generally low. The Group occurs principally in the Central Lowlands of Scotland and other Scottish towns.

Wider pattern

These neighbourhoods characteristically comprise pockets of flats that are scattered across the UK, particularly in towns that retain or have legacies of heavy industry or are in more remote seaside locations. Employed residents of these neighbourhoods work mainly in low-skilled occupations. Residents typically have limited educational qualifications. Unemployment is above average. Some residents live in overcrowded housing within the social rented sector and experience long-term disability. All adult age groups are represented, although there is an overall age bias towards elderly people in general and the very old in particular. Individuals identifying as belonging to ethnic minorities or Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups are uncommon.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Conquer is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Conquer is most concentrated in decile 2 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

2
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Conquer falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Conquer is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Conquer, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Conquer families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Conquer surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Midlothian leads with 20 Conquers recorded in 1881 and an index of 17.39x.

County Total Index
Midlothian 20 17.39x
Northumberland 12 9.40x
Sussex 12 8.29x
Middlesex 11 1.28x
Kent 9 3.07x
Cheshire 6 3.17x
Berwickshire 4 38.50x
East Lothian 4 35.18x
Devon 3 1.68x
Lanarkshire 3 1.08x
West Lothian 3 23.20x
Denbighshire 1 3.08x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Edinburgh St Cuthberts in Midlothian leads with 11 Conquers recorded in 1881 and an index of 23.78x.

Place Total Index
Edinburgh St Cuthberts 11 23.78x
Duddingston 9 389.61x
Gillingham 9 149.01x
Tottenham 9 65.84x
Brighton 8 27.40x
Ancroft 6 1333.33x
Newcastle On Tyne All Sts 6 78.64x
Poulton Cum Seacombe 6 275.23x
Coldstream 4 533.33x
Hove 4 62.99x
Haddington 3 178.57x
Plymouth St Andrew 3 21.80x
Glasgow 2 4.06x
St Pancras London 2 2.89x
Uphall 2 140.85x
Boness 1 56.18x
Maryhill 1 18.42x
Prestonpans 1 131.58x
Wrexham Regis 1 41.49x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Conquer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 4
Janet 3
Ellen 2
Florence 2
Margt. 2
Alice 1
Anna 1
Catherine 1
Charlotte 1
Clara 1
Elizabeth 1
Emma 1
Jane 1
Jessie 1
Kate 1
Margaret 1
Martha 1
Maude 1
Sarah 1
Tryphena 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Conquer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Robert 6
George 3
William 3
Arthur 2
Edward 2
Ben. 1
Benjamin 1
Charles 1
Charlie 1
Chas. 1
Frederick 1
Herbert 1
James 1
Walter 1
Wm. 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Conquer households.

FAQ

Conquer surname: questions and answers

How common was the Conquer surname in 1881?

In 1881, 88 people were recorded with the Conquer surname. That placed it at #21,211 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Conquer surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 156 in 2016. That gives Conquer a modern rank of #23,098.

What does the Conquer map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Conquer bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.