NameCensus.

UK surname

Costar

In the 1881 census there were 114 people recorded with the Costar surname, ranking it #18,324 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 125, ranked #26,827, down from #18,324 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Berwick Salome, Brightwell Salome (Watlington, Oxfordshire), Bensington, and Ewelme, St James Clerkenwell and Fyfield. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include West Oxfordshire, Vale of White Horse and Wealden.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Costar is 151 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 9.6%.

1881 census count

114

Ranked #18,324

Modern count

125

2016, ranked #26,827

Peak year

1911

151 bearers

Map years

8

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Costar had 114 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #18,324 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 125 in 2016, ranked #26,827.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 151 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established Mature Families.

Costar surname distribution map

The map shows where the Costar surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Costar surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Costar over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 127 #14,547
1861 historical 47 #28,023
1881 historical 114 #18,324
1891 historical 106 #23,105
1901 historical 145 #18,426
1911 historical 151 #17,797
1997 modern 120 #24,158
1998 modern 147 #21,935
1999 modern 145 #22,305
2000 modern 141 #22,648
2001 modern 140 #22,441
2002 modern 141 #22,794
2003 modern 135 #23,155
2004 modern 141 #22,689
2005 modern 142 #22,577
2006 modern 137 #23,270
2007 modern 138 #23,478
2008 modern 137 #23,883
2009 modern 141 #23,907
2010 modern 143 #24,247
2011 modern 144 #23,962
2012 modern 126 #26,148
2013 modern 135 #25,395
2014 modern 134 #25,711
2015 modern 125 #26,808
2016 modern 125 #26,827

Geography

Back to top

Where Costars are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Berwick Salome, Brightwell Salome (Watlington, Oxfordshire), Bensington, and Ewelme, St James Clerkenwell, Fyfield, Cumnor and London parishes. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to West Oxfordshire, Vale of White Horse, Wealden and Oxford. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Berwick Salome, Brightwell Salome (Watlington, Oxfordshire), Bensington, and Ewelme Berkshire
2 St James Clerkenwell London (Central Districts)
3 Fyfield Berkshire
4 Cumnor Berkshire
5 London parishes London 2

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 West Oxfordshire 011 West Oxfordshire
2 Vale of White Horse 011 Vale of White Horse
3 West Oxfordshire 015 West Oxfordshire
4 Wealden 009 Wealden
5 Oxford 013 Oxford

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Costar

These lists show first names that appear often with the Costar surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Costar

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Costar, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Established Mature Families

Nationally, the Costar surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established Mature Families, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Costar household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Married couples predominate, many with older dependent children. Detached housing is common. Homeownership rates are the highest within this Supergroup. The presence of some students suggests that households are towards the end of a child rearing phase. Many residents have degree level qualifications, and the occupational profile is heavily skewed towards managerial and professional occupations. Residential developments commonly occur on the periphery of major urban cities or conurbations.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, Costar is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Costar is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Costar falls in decile 9 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

9
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Costar is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Costar, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Costar families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Costar surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Berkshire leads with 20 Costars recorded in 1881 and an index of 23.96x.

County Total Index
Berkshire 20 23.96x
Middlesex 20 1.80x
Oxfordshire 19 27.67x
Surrey 17 3.14x
Hampshire 11 4.83x
Wiltshire 9 9.15x
Worcestershire 6 4.13x
Sussex 5 2.67x
Kent 2 0.53x
Lincolnshire 2 1.13x
Lancashire 1 0.08x
Leicestershire 1 0.81x
Norfolk 1 0.58x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Fyfield in Berkshire leads with 12 Costars recorded in 1881 and an index of 9230.77x.

Place Total Index
Fyfield 12 9230.77x
Twickenham 9 188.68x
Croydon 8 26.60x
Appleton 7 3181.82x
Oxford St Ebbe 7 346.53x
Alverstoke 6 72.73x
Dudley 6 33.99x
Woolvercot 6 2142.86x
West Cholderton 5 8333.33x
Wymering 5 1351.35x
Camberwell 4 5.63x
Hackney London 4 6.42x
Newton Toney 4 3076.92x
Brighton 3 7.93x
Clapham 3 21.58x
Clerkenwell London 3 11.43x
St Pancras London 3 3.35x
Iffley 2 344.83x
Lewes St Ann 2 312.50x
Reigate Foreign 2 34.07x
Standlake 2 740.74x
Brighthampton 1 3333.33x
Broughton In Salford 1 8.29x
Canterbury Christchurch 1 1111.11x
Cromer 1 163.93x
Dover St James 1 60.24x
Gainsborough 1 23.87x
Louth 1 24.57x
Oxford St Giles 1 30.49x
Paddington London 1 2.45x
Stretton Parva 1 3333.33x
Wantage 1 75.19x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Costar surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 7
Emily 4
Sarah 4
Ada 3
Emma 3
Helen 3
Ann 2
Annie 2
Elizabeth 2
Ellen 2
Hannah 2
Lucy 2
Matilda 2
Sophia 2
Alice 1
Amelia 1
Amy 1
Anne 1
Blanche 1
Elizh. 1
Ethel 1
Fanny 1
Harriet 1
Henrietta 1
Lavinia 1
Leah 1
Louisa 1
Madelan 1
Marianne 1
Martha 1
Maud 1
Maude 1
Milly 1
Muryall 1
Nelly 1
Rosa 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Costar surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Costar surname: questions and answers

How common was the Costar surname in 1881?

In 1881, 114 people were recorded with the Costar surname. That placed it at #18,324 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Costar surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 125 in 2016. That gives Costar a modern rank of #26,827.

What does the Costar map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Costar bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.