UK surname
A surname potentially derived from the French word "danger" meaning one who lived in a dangerous area.
In the 1881 census there were 79 people recorded with the Danger surname, ranking it #22,357 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 64, ranked #34,098, down from #22,357 in 1881.
The strongest historical links point to Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, London parishes and Clifton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.
Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Danger is 164 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 19.0%.
1881 census count
79
Ranked #22,357
Modern count
64
2016, ranked #34,098
Peak year
1861
164 bearers
Map years
2
1851 to 1861
Key insights
Map
Back to topThe map shows where the Danger surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.
Distribution map
Danger surname density by area, 1861 census.
Timeline
Back to topThe table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.
| Year | Period | Count | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | historical | 134 | #14,033 |
| 1861 | historical | 164 | #14,188 |
| 1881 | historical | 79 | #22,357 |
| 1891 | historical | 84 | #26,229 |
| 1901 | historical | 69 | #26,499 |
| 1911 | historical | 64 | #26,435 |
| 1997 | modern | 38 | #33,872 |
| 1998 | modern | 47 | #33,197 |
| 1999 | modern | 48 | #33,233 |
| 2000 | modern | 36 | #34,317 |
| 2001 | modern | 34 | #34,356 |
| 2002 | modern | 41 | #34,032 |
| 2003 | modern | 35 | #34,609 |
| 2004 | modern | 36 | #34,717 |
| 2005 | modern | 32 | #35,191 |
| 2006 | modern | 34 | #35,255 |
| 2007 | modern | 33 | #35,461 |
| 2008 | modern | 35 | #35,441 |
| 2009 | modern | 34 | #35,608 |
| 2010 | modern | 37 | #35,566 |
| 2011 | modern | 42 | #35,283 |
| 2012 | modern | 45 | #35,105 |
| 2013 | modern | 52 | #34,780 |
| 2014 | modern | 56 | #34,601 |
| 2015 | modern | 57 | #34,519 |
| 2016 | modern | 64 | #34,098 |
Geography
Back to topHistorical parish links are strongest around Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, London parishes, Clifton, St James Clerkenwell and Brislington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.
The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.
| Rank | Parish | Area |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff | Gloucestershire |
| 2 | London parishes | London 1 |
| 3 | Clifton | Gloucestershire |
| 4 | St James Clerkenwell | London (Central Districts) |
| 5 | Brislington | Somerset |
| Rank | Area | District |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No data | No data |
Forenames
Back to topThese lists show first names that appear often with the Danger surname in historical and recent records.
Recent female names
Recent male names
Modern profile
Back to topModern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Danger, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.
These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.
The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.
UK neighbourhood type
Supergroup
No data
Group
No data
Nationally, the Danger surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Danger household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.
London neighbourhood type
Supergroup
No data
Group
No data
Within London, Danger is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.
Broadband speed
The modern neighbourhood pattern for Danger is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.
Area snapshot
This describes the area pattern most associated with Danger, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.
Origin
Back to topThe surname Danger is believed to have originated in France during the Middle Ages. It is derived from the Old French word "danger," which means "power" or "authority." This word was likely used to describe someone who held a position of authority or power within their community.
The earliest recorded instance of the surname Danger dates back to the late 12th century, when it was found in the Domesday Book, a manuscript record of landowners in England commissioned by William the Conqueror in 1086. However, the name was likely in use in France before this time.
One of the earliest known individuals with the surname Danger was Renaud Danger, a French nobleman who lived in the 13th century. He was a prominent figure in the court of King Louis IX and served as a member of the king's council.
In the 14th century, the surname Danger appeared in various records throughout France, including the regions of Normandy and Brittany. During this time, the name was often associated with families of noble or wealthy status.
Another notable figure with the surname Danger was Jean Danger, a French poet and playwright who lived in the 16th century. He was born in Paris in 1535 and is best known for his works that satirized the political and social issues of his time.
In England, the surname Danger can be traced back to the 15th century, when it was likely brought over by French immigrants or settlers. One of the earliest recorded instances of the name in England was that of William Danger, who was born in London in 1472.
During the 17th and 18th centuries, the surname Danger continued to be found throughout France and England, with some individuals bearing the name achieving prominence in various fields. For example, Jacques Danger was a French philosopher and scholar who lived in the late 17th century and made significant contributions to the study of logic and metaphysics.
Another notable figure with the surname Danger was Pierre Danger, a French artist and engraver who lived in the 18th century. He was known for his intricate engravings of landscapes and architectural scenes, which were highly sought after by collectors of his time.
As the surname Danger spread throughout Europe and beyond, it underwent various spelling variations, such as Dangre, Dangier, and Dangere. These variations were often the result of regional dialects and variations in pronunciation.
Sourced from namecensus.com.
1881 census detail
Back to topThese tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Danger surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.
Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Somerset leads with 22 Dangers recorded in 1881 and an index of 17.74x.
| County | Total | Index |
|---|---|---|
| Somerset | 22 | 17.74x |
| Middlesex | 18 | 2.34x |
| Cheshire | 12 | 7.06x |
| Gloucestershire | 7 | 4.63x |
| Pembrokeshire | 6 | 24.51x |
| Devon | 4 | 2.49x |
| Cornwall | 2 | 2.29x |
| Essex | 2 | 1.32x |
| Lincolnshire | 2 | 1.62x |
| Glamorgan | 1 | 0.75x |
| Kent | 1 | 0.38x |
| Sussex | 1 | 0.77x |
| Worcestershire | 1 | 0.99x |
Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Liscard in Cheshire leads with 12 Dangers recorded in 1881 and an index of 392.16x.
| Place | Total | Index |
|---|---|---|
| Liscard | 12 | 392.16x |
| Clerkenwell London | 6 | 33.00x |
| Poplar London | 6 | 41.27x |
| Stapleton | 6 | 209.06x |
| Steynton | 6 | 759.49x |
| Wembdon | 5 | 1351.35x |
| Brislington | 4 | 1739.13x |
| Paddington London | 4 | 14.12x |
| Sutton Mallett | 4 | 13333.33x |
| Bath St James | 3 | 232.56x |
| Barton St Mary | 2 | 322.58x |
| Cheddon Fitzpaine | 2 | 2500.00x |
| Churchill | 2 | 1000.00x |
| Exeter St Sidwell | 2 | 54.50x |
| Kensington London | 2 | 4.67x |
| Plymouth Charles The | 2 | 28.33x |
| Walcot | 2 | 30.30x |
| West Ham | 2 | 5.96x |
| Clifton | 1 | 13.09x |
| Falmouth | 1 | 32.36x |
| Folkestone | 1 | 19.61x |
| Llanwonno | 1 | 20.75x |
| Newhaven | 1 | 94.34x |
| St Austell | 1 | 33.56x |
| Stourbridge | 1 | 38.61x |
These are the female first names most often recorded with the Danger surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.
These are the male first names most often recorded with the Danger surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.
Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Danger households.
FAQ
In 1881, 79 people were recorded with the Danger surname. That placed it at #22,357 in the surname rankings for that year.
The latest modern count shown here is 64 in 2016. That gives Danger a modern rank of #34,098.
A surname potentially derived from the French word "danger" meaning one who lived in a dangerous area.
The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Danger bearers relative to the surrounding population.
The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.