NameCensus.

UK surname

Dison

In the 1881 census there were 65 people recorded with the Dison surname, ranking it #24,420 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 17, ranked #36,904, down from #24,420 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Millom, Muncaster and Gateshead. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Dison is 830 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 73.8%.

1881 census count

65

Ranked #24,420

Modern count

17

2016, ranked #36,904

Peak year

1861

830 bearers

Map years

3

1851 to 1891

Key insights

  • Dison had 65 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #24,420 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 17 in 2016, ranked #36,904.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 830 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Dison surname distribution map

The map shows where the Dison surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Dison surname density by area, 1891 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Dison over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 142 #13,428
1861 historical 830 #3,320
1881 historical 65 #24,420
1891 historical 346 #9,920
1901 historical 45 #29,156
1911 historical 93 #23,492
1997 modern 16 #36,292
1998 modern 12 #36,790
1999 modern 13 #36,693
2000 modern 13 #36,635
2001 modern 14 #36,372
2002 modern 17 #36,164
2003 modern 15 #36,415
2004 modern 14 #36,648
2005 modern 14 #36,730
2006 modern 15 #36,707
2007 modern 14 #36,886
2008 modern 14 #36,950
2009 modern 15 #36,942
2010 modern 12 #37,307
2011 modern 12 #37,287
2012 modern 13 #37,169
2013 modern 17 #36,857
2014 modern 15 #37,070
2015 modern 16 #36,978
2016 modern 17 #36,904

Geography

Back to top

Where Disons are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Millom, Muncaster, Gateshead, Birstall and Batley. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
2 Millom, Muncaster Cumberland
3 Gateshead Durham
4 Birstall Yorkshire, West Riding
5 Batley Yorkshire, West Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Dison

These lists show first names that appear often with the Dison surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Dison

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Dison, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Dison surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Dison household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Dison is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Dison is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Dison, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Dison families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Dison surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 19 Disons recorded in 1881 and an index of 2.49x.

County Total Index
Lancashire 19 2.49x
Middlesex 9 1.40x
Durham 7 3.66x
Yorkshire 7 1.10x
Essex 5 3.94x
Hampshire 5 3.79x
Cumberland 4 7.22x
Devon 3 2.24x
Berkshire 2 4.14x
Channel Islands 1 5.24x
Cheshire 1 0.70x
Northumberland 1 1.04x
Staffordshire 1 0.46x
Surrey 1 0.32x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Gateshead in Durham leads with 7 Disons recorded in 1881 and an index of 48.81x.

Place Total Index
Gateshead 7 48.81x
Bromley London 6 42.37x
Carisbrooke 5 273.22x
Ince In Makerfield 5 140.85x
Preston 5 24.47x
West Ham 5 17.83x
Colne 4 175.44x
Cockermouth 3 256.41x
Exeter St Sidwell 3 97.72x
Hopwood 3 300.00x
Kilham 3 1111.11x
Ecclesfield 2 42.74x
Reading St Giles 2 42.19x
Almondbury 1 32.47x
Barton Upon Irwell 1 17.39x
Birkenhead 1 8.83x
Bridekirk 1 227.27x
Bushbury 1 256.41x
Croydon 1 5.74x
Falsgrave 1 106.38x
Fulham London 1 10.72x
Mile End Old Town London 1 7.30x
North Shields 1 52.36x
St Helier 1 16.10x
Westminster St Margaret 1 32.26x
Withington 1 40.65x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Dison surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 5
Elizabeth 3
Florence 2
Isabella 2
Margaret 2
Martha 2
Sarah 2
Alice 1
Clara 1
Constance 1
Dorothy 1
Eleanor 1
Eliza 1
Ella 1
Ellenore 1
Emely 1
Emily 1
Fanny 1
Gertrude 1
Grace 1
Hannah 1
Hetty 1
Jane 1
Labith 1
Lilian 1
Mabel 1
Rose 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Dison surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 6
William 3
George 2
James 2
Richard 2
Alexander 1
Arthur 1
Charles 1
Frederick 1
Geo. 1
Henry 1
Jas.H. 1
Joe 1
Lewis 1
Robert 1
Samuel 1
Thomas 1

FAQ

Dison surname: questions and answers

How common was the Dison surname in 1881?

In 1881, 65 people were recorded with the Dison surname. That placed it at #24,420 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Dison surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 17 in 2016. That gives Dison a modern rank of #36,904.

What does the Dison map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Dison bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.