NameCensus.

UK surname

Elbourn

In the 1881 census there were 170 people recorded with the Elbourn surname, ranking it #14,265 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 161, ranked #22,606, down from #14,265 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Shelford, Little and Cambridge: St Andrew the Less, St Andrew the Great, Holy Trinity, St Benedict. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include South Cambridgeshire, Watford and Thurrock.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Elbourn is 197 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 5.3%.

1881 census count

170

Ranked #14,265

Modern count

161

2016, ranked #22,606

Peak year

1911

197 bearers

Map years

8

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Elbourn had 170 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,265 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 161 in 2016, ranked #22,606.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 197 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Elbourn surname distribution map

The map shows where the Elbourn surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Elbourn surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Elbourn over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 102 #16,933
1861 historical 89 #22,419
1881 historical 170 #14,265
1891 historical 160 #17,555
1901 historical 174 #16,520
1911 historical 197 #15,101
1997 modern 151 #21,034
1998 modern 156 #21,144
1999 modern 157 #21,201
2000 modern 158 #21,055
2001 modern 153 #21,197
2002 modern 159 #21,086
2003 modern 149 #21,766
2004 modern 148 #22,000
2005 modern 148 #21,961
2006 modern 151 #21,818
2007 modern 151 #22,120
2008 modern 154 #22,034
2009 modern 162 #21,791
2010 modern 161 #22,385
2011 modern 151 #23,204
2012 modern 151 #23,166
2013 modern 151 #23,529
2014 modern 153 #23,537
2015 modern 154 #23,306
2016 modern 161 #22,606

Geography

Back to top

Where Elbourns are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Shelford, Little, Cambridge: St Andrew the Less, St Andrew the Great, Holy Trinity, St Benedict, Chesham (incl. Chartridge, Billington & Latimers with Waterside and Melbourn, Meldreth. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to South Cambridgeshire, Watford, Thurrock, Broxbourne and Basildon. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 3
2 Shelford, Little Cambridgeshire
3 Cambridge: St Andrew the Less, St Andrew the Great, Holy Trinity, St Benedict Cambridgeshire
4 Chesham (incl. Chartridge, Billington & Latimers with Waterside Buckinghamshire
5 Melbourn, Meldreth Hertfordshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 South Cambridgeshire 018 South Cambridgeshire
2 Watford 002 Watford
3 Thurrock 004 Thurrock
4 Broxbourne 001 Broxbourne
5 Basildon 016 Basildon

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Elbourn

These lists show first names that appear often with the Elbourn surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Elbourn

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Elbourn, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Elbourn surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Elbourn household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburban Asian Communities

Group

Settled Semi-Detached Asians

Within London, Elbourn is most associated with areas classed as Settled Semi-Detached Asians, part of Suburban Asian Communities. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These residents share Supergroup characteristics of large (non-Chinese) Asian populations but those identifying as Bangladeshi are notably absent. Many residents were born in the UK, while other more recent migrants have African birthplaces. Semi-detached housing, much of it owner occupied, prevails in these suburban residential locations.

Wider London pattern

Many residents of these neighbourhoods are of (non-Chinese) Asian descent, with many identifying as Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi. Neighbourhoods are located across large areas of suburban west, north-east and south London. Detached, semi-detached and terraced houses are more prevalent than flats and socially rented housing is uncommon. Few residents live in communal establishments. Many families have dependent children, sometimes in overcrowded accommodation, and few households are ethnically mixed. Marriage rates are above the London average. The even age distribution, relative absence of individuals living alone and frequent incidence of households with children suggests that multi-generation households may be relatively common. Employment is often in skilled trades, elementary, sales and customer service occupations, and roles as process, plant, and machine operatives. Manufacturing and construction are well represented, along with employment in distribution, hotels, and restaurants. Many adults have only level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. English is not used at home by some residents. Religious affiliation is above average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Elbourn is most concentrated in decile 4 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

4
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Elbourn falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Elbourn is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Elbourn, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Elbourn families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Elbourn surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Cambridgeshire leads with 83 Elbourns recorded in 1881 and an index of 78.57x.

County Total Index
Cambridgeshire 83 78.57x
Buckinghamshire 34 33.72x
Hertfordshire 25 21.75x
Surrey 9 1.11x
Middlesex 7 0.42x
Oxfordshire 5 4.85x
Lancashire 3 0.15x
Yorkshire 2 0.12x
Essex 1 0.30x
Royal Navy 1 5.03x
Suffolk 1 0.49x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Chesham in Buckinghamshire leads with 28 Elbourns recorded in 1881 and an index of 752.69x.

Place Total Index
Chesham 28 752.69x
Stapleford 18 5625.00x
Bassingbourn 17 1096.77x
Little Shelford 15 5172.41x
St Albans St Peter 10 257.73x
Camberwell 9 8.45x
Sawston 9 882.35x
Great Shelford 8 1454.55x
Meldreth 7 1707.32x
Amersham 6 419.58x
Watford 6 67.34x
Acton 5 51.12x
St Albans 5 211.86x
Thame 5 267.38x
Barrow In Furness 3 11.14x
Foxton 3 1250.00x
St Albans St Michael 3 234.38x
North Bierley 2 22.42x
St Andrewthe Less 2 16.57x
Bishop Stortford 1 26.04x
Bromley London 1 2.73x
Chesterton 1 30.67x
Grantchester 1 151.52x
Ipswich St Mathew 1 17.57x
Melbourn 1 97.09x
Paddington London 1 1.63x
Royal Navy 1 5.89x
The Holy Sepulchre 1 384.62x
Walthamstow 1 8.44x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Elbourn surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Elbourn surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 15
Charles 8
John 6
Edward 4
George 4
Joseph 4
Joshua 4
Alfred 3
James 3
Arthur 2
Frederic 2
Henry 2
Owen 2
Robert 2
Albert 1
David 1
Earnest 1
Edw. 1
Edwd. 1
Frank 1
Fred 1
Frederick 1
Fredk 1
Fredrick 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
Joe 1
Matthew 1
Maxwell 1
Percy 1
Peter 1
Richard 1
Saml. 1
Samuel 1
Sidney 1
Thomas 1
Walter 1
Willie 1

FAQ

Elbourn surname: questions and answers

How common was the Elbourn surname in 1881?

In 1881, 170 people were recorded with the Elbourn surname. That placed it at #14,265 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Elbourn surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 161 in 2016. That gives Elbourn a modern rank of #22,606.

What does the Elbourn map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Elbourn bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.