NameCensus.

UK surname

Finding

In the 1881 census there were 169 people recorded with the Finding surname, ranking it #14,324 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 93, ranked #31,945, down from #14,324 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Wilshampstead, Biggleswade and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include West Dorset, Wiltshire and Peterborough.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Finding is 236 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 45.0%.

1881 census count

169

Ranked #14,324

Modern count

93

2016, ranked #31,945

Peak year

1911

236 bearers

Map years

7

1851 to 1998

Key insights

  • Finding had 169 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,324 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 93 in 2016, ranked #31,945.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 236 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Finding surname distribution map

The map shows where the Finding surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Finding surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Finding over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 111 #16,006
1861 historical 127 #17,469
1881 historical 169 #14,324
1891 historical 166 #17,077
1901 historical 189 #15,684
1911 historical 236 #13,452
1997 modern 99 #27,039
1998 modern 102 #27,314
1999 modern 108 #26,602
2000 modern 107 #26,700
2001 modern 104 #26,765
2002 modern 115 #25,749
2003 modern 104 #27,101
2004 modern 95 #28,746
2005 modern 97 #28,485
2006 modern 93 #29,411
2007 modern 101 #28,505
2008 modern 98 #29,355
2009 modern 99 #29,754
2010 modern 97 #30,697
2011 modern 93 #31,169
2012 modern 94 #31,258
2013 modern 93 #31,785
2014 modern 96 #31,667
2015 modern 97 #31,499
2016 modern 93 #31,945

Geography

Back to top

Where Findings are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Wilshampstead, Biggleswade, London parishes, Eyworth and Northill, Sandy. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to West Dorset, Wiltshire and Peterborough. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Wilshampstead Bedfordshire
2 Biggleswade Bedfordshire
3 London parishes London 3
4 Eyworth Bedfordshire
5 Northill, Sandy Bedfordshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 West Dorset 011 West Dorset
2 West Dorset 010 West Dorset
3 Wiltshire 028 Wiltshire
4 Peterborough 001 Peterborough
5 Peterborough 004 Peterborough

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Finding

These lists show first names that appear often with the Finding surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Finding

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Finding, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Finding surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Finding household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Finding is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Finding is most concentrated in decile 4 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

4
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Finding falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Finding is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Finding, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Finding families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Finding surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Bedfordshire leads with 83 Findings recorded in 1881 and an index of 97.24x.

County Total Index
Bedfordshire 83 97.24x
Northamptonshire 35 22.57x
Huntingdonshire 18 55.00x
Cambridgeshire 9 8.62x
Kent 9 1.60x
Surrey 8 1.00x
Middlesex 7 0.42x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Raunds in Northamptonshire leads with 26 Findings recorded in 1881 and an index of 1645.57x.

Place Total Index
Raunds 26 1645.57x
Sandy 24 1600.00x
Huntingdon St Mary 15 1829.27x
Eyworth 11 11000.00x
Wilshampstead 10 2173.91x
Greenwich 9 34.30x
Southill 8 1159.42x
All Saints Cambridge 7 958.90x
Biggleswade 6 214.29x
Toddington 6 491.80x
Battersea 5 8.24x
Bedford St Peter 5 225.23x
Islington London 5 3.13x
Marston Moretaine 5 746.27x
Bedford St Mary 4 181.82x
Northampton St Sepulchre 4 50.70x
Ampthill 2 157.48x
Kimbolton 2 289.86x
St Andrewthe Less 2 16.76x
Thrapston 2 256.41x
Croydon 1 2.24x
Hackney London 1 1.08x
Kempston 1 51.55x
Lambeth 1 0.70x
Northampton Priory St 1 10.75x
Northill 1 125.00x
Peterborough 1 8.90x
St Ives 1 58.82x
St Pancras London 1 0.75x
Streatham 1 8.18x
Wellingborough 1 12.82x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Finding surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 13
Elizabeth 10
Eliza 6
Sarah 5
Susan 5
Emma 3
Fanny 3
Hannah 3
Martha 3
Rebecca 3
Ann 2
Annie 2
Bertha 2
Emily 2
Kate 2
Margaret 2
Maria 2
Ada 1
Anne 1
Besty 1
Charlotte 1
Clara 1
Elizth. 1
Ellen 1
Florence 1
Grace 1
Jane 1
Julia 1
Louisa 1
Lydia 1
M.C. 1
Maud 1
May 1
Rosa 1
Selina 1
Sophia 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Finding surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 12
William 12
John 7
Joseph 6
Arthur 3
Charles 3
Frederick 3
James 3
Samuel 3
Thomas 3
Walter 3
Alfred 2
David 2
Edward 2
Herbert 2
Robert 2
Albert 1
Amos 1
Clark 1
Ephraim 1
Frank 1
Fred 1
Fredk. 1
Harry 1
Jessie 1
Lambert 1
Levi 1
Manoah 1
Trueman 1

FAQ

Finding surname: questions and answers

How common was the Finding surname in 1881?

In 1881, 169 people were recorded with the Finding surname. That placed it at #14,324 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Finding surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 93 in 2016. That gives Finding a modern rank of #31,945.

What does the Finding map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Finding bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.