NameCensus.

UK surname

First

Of English origin, relating to being the firstborn child or eldest.

In the 1881 census there were 7 people recorded with the First surname, ranking it #32,765 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 39, ranked #35,484, down from #32,765 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Kensworth, Epping and Tewkesbury. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for First is 194 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 457.1%.

1881 census count

7

Ranked #32,765

Modern count

39

2016, ranked #35,484

Peak year

1861

194 bearers

Map years

1

1861 to 1861

Key insights

  • First had 7 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #32,765 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 39 in 2016, ranked #35,484.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 194 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

First surname distribution map

The map shows where the First surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

First surname density by area, 1861 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

First over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 40 #26,118
1861 historical 194 #12,310
1881 historical 7 #32,765
1891 historical 46 #30,657
1901 historical 13 #32,633
1911 historical 18 #31,542
1997 modern 22 #35,584
1998 modern 24 #35,488
1999 modern 20 #35,923
2000 modern 16 #36,316
2001 modern 16 #36,160
2002 modern 17 #36,164
2003 modern 17 #36,198
2004 modern 19 #36,147
2005 modern 19 #36,247
2006 modern 18 #36,412
2007 modern 20 #36,362
2008 modern 25 #36,072
2009 modern 23 #36,313
2010 modern 32 #35,848
2011 modern 26 #36,193
2012 modern 30 #35,929
2013 modern 31 #35,927
2014 modern 32 #35,896
2015 modern 32 #35,876
2016 modern 39 #35,484

Geography

Back to top

Where Firsts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Kensworth, Epping, Tewkesbury, St Dunstan Stepney and Manchester. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Kensworth Bedfordshire
2 Epping Essex
3 Tewkesbury Gloucestershire
4 St Dunstan Stepney London (East Districts)
5 Manchester Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with First

These lists show first names that appear often with the First surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for First

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For First, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the First surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every First household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, First is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for First is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with First, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of First

The surname FIRST has its origins in England, dating back to the 13th century. It is believed to have derived from the Old English word "fyrst," meaning "first" or "foremost." This surname may have been given to the firstborn son or the first settler in a particular area.

One of the earliest recorded references to the FIRST surname can be found in the Hundred Rolls of 1273, which were census-like records from the reign of King Edward I. The name appears as "Robert le Fyrst" in these records.

In the 14th century, the surname FIRST is mentioned in the Subsidy Rolls of Worcestershire, where a certain "John le Furst" is listed as a taxpayer. This suggests that the family may have had roots in the county of Worcestershire during that time period.

The FIRST surname is also found in the Hearth Tax Rolls of 1662-1666, which were records of households required to pay a tax based on the number of hearths or fireplaces in their homes. This indicates that the name had become more widespread across England by the 17th century.

One notable individual with the FIRST surname was Sir Thomas First (1548-1616), an English politician who served as a Member of Parliament for the borough of Woodstock. He was also an influential landowner and businessman in Oxfordshire.

Another prominent figure was John First (1622-1686), an English clergyman and author who served as the Dean of Worcester Cathedral. He was known for his writings on theological subjects and his involvement in the controversies surrounding the Church of England during the 17th century.

In the 18th century, the FIRST surname can be found in the records of the East India Company, with a certain John First (1720-1795) serving as a captain in the company's maritime fleet. He was involved in various trading voyages to India and other parts of Asia.

The name FIRST has also been associated with several place names in England, such as First Green in Buckinghamshire and First Lane in Berkshire. These locations may have been named after individuals bearing the FIRST surname or related to the meaning of the name itself.

Other notable individuals with the FIRST surname include:

1. William First (1797-1876), a British explorer and naturalist who traveled extensively in South America and documented the flora and fauna of the region.

2. Mary First (1858-1942), an English suffragist and activist who campaigned for women's rights and played a significant role in the women's suffrage movement.

3. John First (1878-1956), an American businessman and philanthropist who established the First Foundation, which supported various educational and charitable causes.

4. Edward First (1901-1987), a British artist and sculptor known for his abstract works and contributions to the modernist movement in art.

5. Alice First (1923-2012), an American author and journalist who wrote extensively on social and political issues, earning acclaim for her insightful reporting and commentary.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

First families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the First surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Devon leads with 2 Firsts recorded in 1881 and an index of 14.11x.

County Total Index
Devon 2 14.11x
Surrey 2 6.03x
Essex 1 7.44x
Renfrewshire 1 18.94x
Yorkshire 1 1.48x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Exeter St George The in Devon leads with 2 Firsts recorded in 1881 and an index of 10000.00x.

Place Total Index
Exeter St George The 2 10000.00x
Holbeck 1 222.22x
Lambeth 1 16.84x
Newington 1 39.84x
Walthamstow 1 208.33x
West Greenock 1 105.26x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the First surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 1
Jane 1
Louisa 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the First surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Charles 1
G. 1
Samuel 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in First households.

FAQ

First surname: questions and answers

How common was the First surname in 1881?

In 1881, 7 people were recorded with the First surname. That placed it at #32,765 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the First surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 39 in 2016. That gives First a modern rank of #35,484.

What does the First surname mean?

Of English origin, relating to being the firstborn child or eldest.

What does the First map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of First bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.