NameCensus.

UK surname

Fosters

In the 1881 census there were 8 people recorded with the Fosters surname, ranking it #32,581 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 10, ranked #37,599, down from #32,581 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to St Leonard Shoreditch, Drypool and Manchester. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Fosters is 129 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 25.0%.

1881 census count

8

Ranked #32,581

Modern count

10

2016, ranked #37,599

Peak year

1861

129 bearers

Map years

1

1861 to 1861

Key insights

  • Fosters had 8 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #32,581 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 10 in 2016, ranked #37,599.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 129 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Fosters surname distribution map

The map shows where the Fosters surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Fosters surname density by area, 1861 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Fosters over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 33 #27,390
1861 historical 129 #17,271
1881 historical 8 #32,581
1891 historical 41 #31,095
1901 historical 1 #34,548
1911 historical 31 #29,952
1997 modern 7 #37,533
1998 modern 7 #37,533
1999 modern 9 #37,217
2000 modern 6 #37,624
2001 modern 6 #37,456
2002 modern 6 #37,532
2003 modern 4 #37,951
2004 modern 5 #37,830
2005 modern 4 #38,078
2006 modern 7 #37,634
2007 modern 6 #37,837
2008 modern 5 #38,027
2009 modern 5 #38,122
2010 modern 5 #38,186
2011 modern 8 #37,737
2012 modern 9 #37,614
2013 modern 8 #37,767
2014 modern 9 #37,679
2015 modern 10 #37,563
2016 modern 10 #37,599

Geography

Back to top

Where Fosters' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around St Leonard Shoreditch, Drypool, Manchester, Badgeworth and St Mary Islington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 St Leonard Shoreditch London (East Districts)
2 Drypool Yorkshire, East Riding
3 Manchester Lancashire
4 Badgeworth Gloucestershire
5 St Mary Islington London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Fosters

These lists show first names that appear often with the Fosters surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Fosters

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Fosters, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Fosters surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Fosters household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Fosters is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Fosters is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
Other Ethnic Group

This describes the area pattern most associated with Fosters, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Fosters families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Fosters surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Monmouthshire leads with 3 Fosters' recorded in 1881 and an index of 53.19x.

County Total Index
Monmouthshire 3 53.19x
Kent 2 7.52x
Hertfordshire 1 18.59x
Northumberland 1 8.61x
Warwickshire 1 5.08x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Llanover in Monmouthshire leads with 3 Fosters' recorded in 1881 and an index of 1578.95x.

Place Total Index
Llanover 3 1578.95x
Birmingham 1 15.24x
Bromley 1 243.90x
Prudhoe 1 1250.00x
Sittingbourne 1 476.19x
St Ippollitts 1 3333.33x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Fosters surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 1
Harriet 1
Katie 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Fosters surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 2
Abram 1
Leonard 1
William 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Fosters households.

FAQ

Fosters surname: questions and answers

How common was the Fosters surname in 1881?

In 1881, 8 people were recorded with the Fosters surname. That placed it at #32,581 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Fosters surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 10 in 2016. That gives Fosters a modern rank of #37,599.

What does the Fosters map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Fosters bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.