NameCensus.

UK surname

Fudger

In the 1881 census there were 83 people recorded with the Fudger surname, ranking it #21,808 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 80, ranked #33,030, down from #21,808 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Worcester St Clement, Worcester St John Bedwardine, Kenswick and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Worcester, Stafford and Sheffield.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Fudger is 152 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 3.6%.

1881 census count

83

Ranked #21,808

Modern count

80

2016, ranked #33,030

Peak year

1911

152 bearers

Map years

3

1901 to 1998

Key insights

  • Fudger had 83 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #21,808 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 80 in 2016, ranked #33,030.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 152 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities.

Fudger surname distribution map

The map shows where the Fudger surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Fudger surname density by area, 1998 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Fudger over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 48 #24,615
1861 historical 51 #27,498
1881 historical 83 #21,808
1891 historical 96 #24,559
1901 historical 119 #20,624
1911 historical 152 #17,712
1997 modern 97 #27,342
1998 modern 105 #26,822
1999 modern 103 #27,305
2000 modern 104 #27,150
2001 modern 104 #26,765
2002 modern 98 #28,243
2003 modern 96 #28,381
2004 modern 99 #28,136
2005 modern 97 #28,485
2006 modern 91 #29,725
2007 modern 86 #30,808
2008 modern 82 #31,597
2009 modern 85 #31,717
2010 modern 86 #32,081
2011 modern 83 #32,336
2012 modern 85 #32,395
2013 modern 87 #32,472
2014 modern 86 #32,663
2015 modern 84 #32,782
2016 modern 80 #33,030

Geography

Back to top

Where Fudgers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Worcester St Clement, Worcester St John Bedwardine, Kenswick, London parishes, St Dunstan Stepney and Northampton St Giles, Northampton St Sepulchre, Northampton Priory. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Worcester, Stafford, Sheffield and Peterborough. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Worcester St Clement Worcestershire
2 Worcester St John Bedwardine, Kenswick Worcestershire
3 London parishes London 3
4 St Dunstan Stepney London (East Districts)
5 Northampton St Giles, Northampton St Sepulchre, Northampton Priory Northamptonshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Worcester 001 Worcester
2 Stafford 016 Stafford
3 Sheffield 032 Sheffield
4 Stafford 013 Stafford
5 Peterborough 009 Peterborough

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Fudger

These lists show first names that appear often with the Fudger surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Fudger

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Fudger, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities

Nationally, the Fudger surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Fudger household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Single-person households are common in these neighbourhoods, and these residents are typically divorced rather than never married. A high proportion of residents were born outside the UK in the EU. There are many young adults, some with young children, but relatively few residents are of normal retirement age or over. Although levels of identification with ethnic minorities are in line with the Supergroup average, individuals identifying with Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is more common than average. High long-term disability rates are observed, and unpaid care is more common than in the rest of the Group. The predominant housing types are terraced houses and flats, which are typically part of the social rented sector. This Group is commonly found in coastal areas and (present-day or former) industrial towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Fudger is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Fudger is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Fudger falls in decile 3 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

3
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Fudger is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Fudger, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Fudger families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Fudger surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Worcestershire leads with 38 Fudgers recorded in 1881 and an index of 37.29x.

County Total Index
Worcestershire 38 37.29x
Middlesex 15 1.92x
Northamptonshire 14 19.08x
Surrey 6 1.58x
Warwickshire 6 3.05x
Herefordshire 1 3.13x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Mile End Old Town London in Middlesex leads with 8 Fudgers recorded in 1881 and an index of 48.16x.

Place Total Index
Mile End Old Town London 8 48.16x
Northampton Priory St 8 181.82x
Worcester St Clement 7 1076.92x
Duston 6 895.52x
Worcester St John 6 491.80x
Claines 5 178.57x
Worcester St Helen 5 1515.15x
Worcester St Nicholas 5 1041.67x
Worcester St Peter 5 259.07x
Aston 4 7.38x
Battersea 4 13.93x
Hackney London 4 9.14x
Worcester St Alban 4 5714.29x
Bermondsey 2 8.61x
Bow London 2 20.14x
Bulkington 2 465.12x
Hammersmith London 1 5.20x
Nortonwith 1 625.00x
Upton On Severn 1 149.25x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Fudger surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Eliza 4
Mary 4
Jane 3
Sarah 3
Alice 2
Anne 2
H. 2
Harriet 2
Agnes 1
Anna 1
Cecelia 1
Edith 1
Elizabeth 1
Elizabth 1
Emily 1
Emma 1
Fanny 1
Gertrude 1
Kate 1
Louisa 1
Margaret 1
Matilda 1
Rachel 1
Rose 1
Sarh 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Fudger surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
James 5
Thomas 5
John 4
Walter 4
Frederick 3
George 3
William 3
Albert 2
Charles 2
Wm. 2
Arthur 1
Francis 1
Henry 1
Hy. 1
Joseph 1
Richard 1
Robert 1
Samuel 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Fudger households.

FAQ

Fudger surname: questions and answers

How common was the Fudger surname in 1881?

In 1881, 83 people were recorded with the Fudger surname. That placed it at #21,808 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Fudger surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 80 in 2016. That gives Fudger a modern rank of #33,030.

What does the Fudger map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Fudger bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.