NameCensus.

UK surname

Garnish

In the 1881 census there were 128 people recorded with the Garnish surname, ranking it #17,079 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 154, ranked #23,293, down from #17,079 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Sherwill, St George in the East and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include North Hertfordshire, Basingstoke and Deane and Barnet.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Garnish is 199 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 20.3%.

1881 census count

128

Ranked #17,079

Modern count

154

2016, ranked #23,293

Peak year

1911

199 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Garnish had 128 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,079 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 154 in 2016, ranked #23,293.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 199 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Garnish surname distribution map

The map shows where the Garnish surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Garnish surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Garnish over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 88 #18,569
1861 historical 136 #16,556
1881 historical 128 #17,079
1891 historical 154 #18,004
1901 historical 186 #15,839
1911 historical 199 #15,016
1997 modern 166 #19,797
1998 modern 171 #19,956
1999 modern 167 #20,374
2000 modern 171 #20,044
2001 modern 167 #20,060
2002 modern 164 #20,687
2003 modern 162 #20,624
2004 modern 170 #20,146
2005 modern 178 #19,535
2006 modern 174 #19,921
2007 modern 169 #20,562
2008 modern 164 #21,137
2009 modern 174 #20,782
2010 modern 171 #21,481
2011 modern 163 #21,983
2012 modern 173 #21,135
2013 modern 173 #21,486
2014 modern 167 #22,180
2015 modern 155 #23,194
2016 modern 154 #23,293

Geography

Back to top

Where Garnishs are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Sherwill, St George in the East, London parishes, Orsett, Little Thurrock, Stock and Lambeth. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to North Hertfordshire, Basingstoke and Deane, Barnet, Havering and Suffolk Coastal. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Sherwill Devon
2 St George in the East London (East Districts)
3 London parishes London 3
4 Orsett, Little Thurrock, Stock Essex
5 Lambeth London (South Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 North Hertfordshire 004 North Hertfordshire
2 Basingstoke and Deane 003 Basingstoke and Deane
3 Barnet 004 Barnet
4 Havering 011 Havering
5 Suffolk Coastal 004 Suffolk Coastal

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Garnish

These lists show first names that appear often with the Garnish surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Garnish

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Garnish, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Garnish surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Garnish household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Garnish is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Garnish is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Garnish falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Garnish is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Garnish, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Garnish families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Garnish surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 39 Garnishs recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.12x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 39 3.12x
Devon 29 11.16x
Essex 27 10.95x
Surrey 21 3.45x
Sussex 5 2.38x
Lancashire 3 0.20x
Kent 2 0.47x
Gloucestershire 1 0.41x
Warwickshire 1 0.32x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Islington London in Middlesex leads with 22 Garnishs recorded in 1881 and an index of 18.18x.

Place Total Index
Islington London 22 18.18x
Lambeth 21 19.29x
Sherwill 15 8333.33x
Brighton 5 11.77x
West Ham 5 9.19x
Ilfracombe 4 149.25x
Laindon 4 2857.14x
St George In East London 4 34.07x
Bethnal Green London 3 5.53x
Great Burstead 3 333.33x
Kensington London 3 4.32x
Little Burstead 3 3333.33x
Liverpool 3 3.33x
Mile End Old Town London 3 11.29x
Pilton 3 348.84x
Wennington 3 3750.00x
Yarnscombe 3 2727.27x
Buckfastleigh 2 166.67x
Chelmsford 2 47.28x
Grays Thurrock 2 87.34x
Rochester St Margaret 2 44.54x
St George Bloomsbury 2 27.93x
Aveley 1 238.10x
Birmingham 1 0.95x
Bishops Tawton 1 123.46x
Blackmore 1 416.67x
Bristol St Augustine 1 25.32x
Eastwood 1 454.55x
Great Torrington 1 68.03x
Limehouse London 1 7.29x
Rayne 1 588.24x
St Marylebone London 1 1.50x
Stanford Le Hope 1 285.71x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Garnish surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Garnish surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Garnish surname: questions and answers

How common was the Garnish surname in 1881?

In 1881, 128 people were recorded with the Garnish surname. That placed it at #17,079 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Garnish surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 154 in 2016. That gives Garnish a modern rank of #23,293.

What does the Garnish map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Garnish bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.