NameCensus.

UK surname

Gillbanks

In the 1881 census there were 121 people recorded with the Gillbanks surname, ranking it #17,671 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 225, ranked #18,105, down from #17,671 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Manchester and Batley. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Sefton, Wigan and Liverpool.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Gillbanks is 244 in 2002. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 86.0%.

1881 census count

121

Ranked #17,671

Modern count

225

2016, ranked #18,105

Peak year

2002

244 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Gillbanks had 121 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,671 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 225 in 2016, ranked #18,105.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 218 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Small Town Suburbia.

Gillbanks surname distribution map

The map shows where the Gillbanks surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Gillbanks surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Gillbanks over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 110 #16,093
1861 historical 122 #18,036
1881 historical 121 #17,671
1891 historical 158 #17,705
1901 historical 198 #15,213
1911 historical 218 #14,177
1997 modern 233 #15,975
1998 modern 243 #15,993
1999 modern 235 #16,458
2000 modern 229 #16,695
2001 modern 224 #16,716
2002 modern 244 #16,085
2003 modern 237 #16,191
2004 modern 243 #16,004
2005 modern 235 #16,335
2006 modern 232 #16,600
2007 modern 227 #17,041
2008 modern 225 #17,282
2009 modern 234 #17,194
2010 modern 233 #17,606
2011 modern 235 #17,328
2012 modern 227 #17,630
2013 modern 225 #18,027
2014 modern 230 #17,872
2015 modern 232 #17,689
2016 modern 225 #18,105

Geography

Back to top

Where Gillbanks' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Manchester, Batley, West Derby and Crosthwaite. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Sefton, Wigan, Liverpool and West Devon. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Manchester Lancashire
3 Batley Yorkshire, West Riding
4 West Derby Lancashire
5 Crosthwaite Cumberland

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Sefton 020 Sefton
2 Wigan 029 Wigan
3 Liverpool 013 Liverpool
4 Liverpool 027 Liverpool
5 West Devon 003 West Devon

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Gillbanks

These lists show first names that appear often with the Gillbanks surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Gillbanks

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Gillbanks, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Small Town Suburbia

Nationally, the Gillbanks surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Small Town Suburbia, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Gillbanks household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group is predominantly comprised of married couples with no resident dependent children, living in areas characterised neither by under-occupancy nor overcrowding throughout the UK in or adjacent to small towns. White ethnic groups and affiliation with Christianity predominates. Housing tends to be predominantly semi-detached or detached and workers are employed principally in managerial and professional occupations, with semi-skilled occupations also in evidence. These areas of the Supergroup are of higher population density.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Gillbanks is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Gillbanks is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Gillbanks falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Gillbanks is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Gillbanks, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Gillbanks families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Gillbanks surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 34 Gillbanks' recorded in 1881 and an index of 2.53x.

County Total Index
Lancashire 34 2.53x
Cumberland 23 23.61x
Westmorland 13 52.27x
Surrey 12 2.18x
Somerset 10 5.49x
Staffordshire 9 2.36x
Middlesex 7 0.62x
Yorkshire 5 0.45x
Kent 2 0.52x
Hertfordshire 1 1.28x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Axbridge in Somerset leads with 10 Gillbanks' recorded in 1881 and an index of 5555.56x.

Place Total Index
Axbridge 10 5555.56x
Grasmere 10 3448.28x
Tipton 9 76.99x
West Derby 9 22.91x
Ulverston 7 179.03x
Camberwell 6 8.30x
Lambeth 6 6.08x
Wythburn 6 7500.00x
Keswick 5 400.00x
Liverpool 5 6.13x
Newton 5 48.31x
Borrowdale 4 2352.94x
Burgh By Sands 3 967.74x
Horton In Bradford 3 17.13x
Preston 3 8.35x
St Pancras London 3 3.29x
Askham 2 1000.00x
Bury 2 13.04x
Erith 2 52.63x
Kensington London 2 3.18x
Manchester 2 3.31x
Beetham 1 263.16x
Caldbeck 1 217.39x
Chipping Barnet 1 73.53x
Ennerdale Kinniside 1 909.09x
Hackney London 1 1.58x
Hammersmith London 1 3.59x
High Ireby 1 2500.00x
Ingleton 1 158.73x
Marsden In Almondbury 1 98.04x
Millom 1 33.44x
St Mary Within 1 81.97x
Wavertree 1 23.26x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Gillbanks surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 10
Elizabeth 5
Jane 5
Margaret 4
Sarah 4
Agnes 2
Ann 2
Annie 2
Ellen 2
Ada 1
Alice 1
Augusta 1
Bertha 1
Blanche 1
Charlotte 1
Claire 1
Clara 1
Deborah 1
E. 1
Edith 1
Eleanor 1
Eliza 1
Emily 1
F.A. 1
Janet 1
Lillian 1
Lydia 1
Mabel 1
Maria 1
May 1
Rosina 1
Sophia 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Gillbanks surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 16
William 9
Thomas 6
Joseph 4
Charles 2
Benj. 1
Cecil 1
Edward 1
F. 1
Frederick 1
Fredrick 1
H.F. 1
Harry 1
Henry 1
Isaac 1
Jacob 1
James 1
Jno. 1
Jonathon 1
Miles 1
Plaskett 1
Richd. 1
Robert 1
Walter 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Gillbanks surname: questions and answers

How common was the Gillbanks surname in 1881?

In 1881, 121 people were recorded with the Gillbanks surname. That placed it at #17,671 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Gillbanks surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 225 in 2016. That gives Gillbanks a modern rank of #18,105.

What does the Gillbanks map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Gillbanks bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.