NameCensus.

UK surname

Gladston

In the 1881 census there were 77 people recorded with the Gladston surname, ranking it #22,617 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 65, ranked #34,017, down from #22,617 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Yetholm, Govan Combination and Gateshead. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Gladston is 133 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 15.6%.

1881 census count

77

Ranked #22,617

Modern count

65

2016, ranked #34,017

Peak year

1861

133 bearers

Map years

2

1851 to 1861

Key insights

  • Gladston had 77 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #22,617 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 65 in 2016, ranked #34,017.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 133 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Gladston surname distribution map

The map shows where the Gladston surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Gladston surname density by area, 1861 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Gladston over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 109 #16,212
1861 historical 133 #16,835
1881 historical 77 #22,617
1891 historical 63 #28,881
1901 historical 59 #27,609
1911 historical 51 #27,708
1997 modern 52 #32,444
1998 modern 55 #32,399
1999 modern 58 #32,268
2000 modern 59 #32,217
2001 modern 55 #32,482
2002 modern 55 #32,831
2003 modern 57 #32,704
2004 modern 56 #33,067
2005 modern 52 #33,619
2006 modern 56 #33,587
2007 modern 59 #33,634
2008 modern 59 #33,827
2009 modern 64 #33,675
2010 modern 63 #34,002
2011 modern 61 #34,121
2012 modern 67 #33,840
2013 modern 66 #34,003
2014 modern 69 #33,833
2015 modern 69 #33,788
2016 modern 65 #34,017

Geography

Back to top

Where Gladstons are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Yetholm, Govan Combination, Gateshead, Newcastle All Saints and Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon). These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Yetholm Roxburgh
2 Govan Combination Lanark
3 Gateshead Durham
4 Newcastle All Saints Northumberland
5 Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon) Northumberland

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Gladston

These lists show first names that appear often with the Gladston surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Gladston

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Gladston, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Gladston surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Gladston household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Gladston is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Gladston is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Gladston, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Gladston families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Gladston surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Northumberland leads with 43 Gladstons recorded in 1881 and an index of 38.48x.

County Total Index
Northumberland 43 38.48x
Yorkshire 8 1.07x
Lanarkshire 6 2.47x
Hampshire 5 3.25x
Durham 4 1.79x
Nottinghamshire 3 2.96x
Middlesex 2 0.27x
Perthshire 2 5.93x
Sussex 2 1.58x
Cumberland 1 1.55x
Kirkcudbrightshire 1 9.20x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Tweedmouth in Northumberland leads with 16 Gladstons recorded in 1881 and an index of 1151.08x.

Place Total Index
Tweedmouth 16 1151.08x
Berwick Upon Tweed 9 379.75x
Sculcoates 8 67.80x
Longbenton 6 126.85x
Govan 5 8.32x
Preston In Tynemouth 5 1136.36x
Newcastle On Tyne All Sts 4 59.97x
Ryde 4 120.85x
Radford 3 58.37x
Westoe 3 23.68x
Hove 2 35.97x
Perth West Church 2 125.00x
Barony 1 1.63x
Elswick 1 11.21x
Gateshead 1 5.98x
Newcastle On Tyne St 1 17.27x
Rerrick 1 212.77x
Sandhoe 1 2000.00x
South Hayling 1 370.37x
Spitalfields London 1 17.70x
St Cuthbert W O 1 31.75x
St George Hanover Square 1 7.56x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Gladston surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Jane 4
Mary 4
Elizabeth 3
Ann 2
Dorothy 2
Isabella 2
Margaret 2
Sarah 2
Alice 1
Amelia 1
Anna 1
Augusta 1
C. 1
Charlotte 1
E. 1
Ellen 1
Euphemia 1
F. 1
Grace 1
Hannah 1
Kate 1
Margery 1
Margory 1
Rosanna 1
Sophia 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Gladston surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 5
Thomas 5
Adam 3
James 3
Mark 3
Joseph 2
Stephen 2
William 2
Alexander 1
Arthur 1
Cecil 1
Filop 1
Walter 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Gladston households.

FAQ

Gladston surname: questions and answers

How common was the Gladston surname in 1881?

In 1881, 77 people were recorded with the Gladston surname. That placed it at #22,617 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Gladston surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 65 in 2016. That gives Gladston a modern rank of #34,017.

What does the Gladston map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Gladston bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.