NameCensus.

UK surname

Goldhawk

In the 1881 census there were 52 people recorded with the Goldhawk surname, ranking it #26,281 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 151, ranked #23,615, up from #26,281 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to No data. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Swale, Neath Port Talbot and Harlow.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Goldhawk is 161 in 2011. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 190.4%.

1881 census count

52

Ranked #26,281

Modern count

151

2016, ranked #23,615

Peak year

2011

161 bearers

Map years

3

1998 to 2016

Key insights

  • Goldhawk had 52 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #26,281 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 151 in 2016, ranked #23,615.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 77 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Goldhawk surname distribution map

The map shows where the Goldhawk surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Goldhawk surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Goldhawk over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 17 #30,267
1861 historical 37 #29,339
1881 historical 52 #26,281
1891 historical 43 #30,933
1901 historical 64 #27,010
1911 historical 77 #25,106
1997 modern 125 #23,567
1998 modern 126 #24,094
1999 modern 132 #23,602
2000 modern 133 #23,462
2001 modern 132 #23,230
2002 modern 143 #22,595
2003 modern 141 #22,549
2004 modern 136 #23,207
2005 modern 131 #23,737
2006 modern 125 #24,611
2007 modern 130 #24,389
2008 modern 130 #24,695
2009 modern 141 #23,907
2010 modern 156 #22,886
2011 modern 161 #22,187
2012 modern 143 #24,019
2013 modern 153 #23,314
2014 modern 153 #23,537
2015 modern 151 #23,613
2016 modern 151 #23,615

Geography

Back to top

Where Goldhawks are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around No data. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Swale, Neath Port Talbot, Harlow, Thanet and St Edmundsbury. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 No data No data

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Swale 015 Swale
2 Neath Port Talbot 018 Neath Port Talbot
3 Harlow 007 Harlow
4 Thanet 002 Thanet
5 St Edmundsbury 013 St Edmundsbury

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Goldhawk

These lists show first names that appear often with the Goldhawk surname in historical and recent records.

Historical female names

No Forenames Found

Historical male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Goldhawk

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Goldhawk, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Goldhawk surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Goldhawk household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Goldhawk is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Goldhawk is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Goldhawk falls in decile 8 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

8
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Goldhawk is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Goldhawk, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Goldhawk families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Goldhawk surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 27 Goldhawks recorded in 1881 and an index of 5.32x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 27 5.32x
Hertfordshire 18 51.49x
Norfolk 3 3.85x
Surrey 2 0.81x
Kent 1 0.58x
Sussex 1 1.17x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Kimpton in Hertfordshire leads with 18 Goldhawks recorded in 1881 and an index of 11250.00x.

Place Total Index
Kimpton 18 11250.00x
Shepperton 14 6363.64x
Staines 6 750.00x
Chelsea London 4 26.18x
Reymerstone 3 6000.00x
Hampton Wick London 2 540.54x
Brighton 1 5.80x
Gillingham 1 28.01x
Hampton London 1 120.48x
Lambeth 1 2.26x
Shere 1 333.33x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Goldhawk surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 5
Harriet 3
Annie 2
Clara 2
Ann 1
Cecilla 1
Edith 1
Eliza 1
Elizth. 1
Jane 1
Kitty 1
Lizzie 1
Madeline 1
Mary 1
May 1
Mille 1
Rosemond 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Goldhawk surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 3
James 2
Joseph 2
William 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Aubrey 1
Chs.K.V. 1
Edward 1
Edwd. 1
Edwin 1
Ernest 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
Horace 1
Ira 1
Owen 1
Peter 1
Thomas 1
Vincent 1
Wilfred 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Goldhawk households.

FAQ

Goldhawk surname: questions and answers

How common was the Goldhawk surname in 1881?

In 1881, 52 people were recorded with the Goldhawk surname. That placed it at #26,281 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Goldhawk surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 151 in 2016. That gives Goldhawk a modern rank of #23,615.

What does the Goldhawk map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Goldhawk bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.