NameCensus.

UK surname

Goodbrand

In the 1881 census there were 142 people recorded with the Goodbrand surname, ranking it #16,012 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 283, ranked #15,359, up from #16,012 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Govan Combination, Cullen and Rathven. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Fraserburgh Harbour and Broadsea, Cowlairs and Port Dundas and Wigan.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Goodbrand is 307 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 99.3%.

1881 census count

142

Ranked #16,012

Modern count

283

2016, ranked #15,359

Peak year

2010

307 bearers

Map years

8

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Goodbrand had 142 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #16,012 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 283 in 2016, ranked #15,359.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 170 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Goodbrand surname distribution map

The map shows where the Goodbrand surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Goodbrand surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Goodbrand over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 116 #15,545
1861 historical 129 #17,271
1881 historical 142 #16,012
1891 historical 164 #17,205
1901 historical 170 #16,762
1911 historical 22 #31,030
1997 modern 258 #14,949
1998 modern 260 #15,291
1999 modern 252 #15,707
2000 modern 255 #15,538
2001 modern 246 #15,684
2002 modern 257 #15,523
2003 modern 243 #15,911
2004 modern 252 #15,618
2005 modern 276 #14,579
2006 modern 260 #15,329
2007 modern 270 #15,080
2008 modern 277 #14,940
2009 modern 289 #14,809
2010 modern 307 #14,485
2011 modern 286 #15,091
2012 modern 277 #15,375
2013 modern 289 #15,142
2014 modern 287 #15,342
2015 modern 275 #15,707
2016 modern 283 #15,359

Geography

Back to top

Where Goodbrands are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Govan Combination, Cullen, Rathven, Fordyce and Boyndie. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Fraserburgh Harbour and Broadsea, Cowlairs and Port Dundas, Wigan, Sutherland North and West and Fraserburgh Smiddyhill. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Govan Combination Lanark
2 Cullen Banff
3 Rathven Banff
4 Fordyce Banff
5 Boyndie Banff

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Fraserburgh Harbour and Broadsea Aberdeenshire
2 Cowlairs and Port Dundas Glasgow City
3 Wigan 024 Wigan
4 Sutherland North and West Highland
5 Fraserburgh Smiddyhill Aberdeenshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Goodbrand

These lists show first names that appear often with the Goodbrand surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Goodbrand

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Goodbrand, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Goodbrand surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Goodbrand household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Goodbrand is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Goodbrand is most concentrated in decile 1 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

1
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Goodbrand falls in decile 4 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

4
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Goodbrand is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Goodbrand, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Goodbrand families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Goodbrand surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Banffshire leads with 77 Goodbrands recorded in 1881 and an index of 271.89x.

County Total Index
Banffshire 77 271.89x
Aberdeenshire 19 15.02x
Lancashire 12 0.74x
Morayshire 11 51.84x
Lanarkshire 9 2.04x
Ross-shire 4 10.67x
Middlesex 3 0.22x
Selkirkshire 3 24.29x
Sutherland 2 19.05x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Rathven in Banffshire leads with 21 Goodbrands recorded in 1881 and an index of 394.74x.

Place Total Index
Rathven 21 394.74x
Cullen 13 1238.10x
Boyndie 10 1063.83x
Aberdeen St Nicholas 9 38.04x
Fordyce 9 441.18x
Govan 9 8.24x
Aberdeen Old Machar 8 30.30x
Ordiquhill 8 2352.94x
Cheetham 7 57.90x
Keith 7 231.79x
Inverkeithny 6 1395.35x
Kinloss 4 800.00x
Barton Upon Irwell 3 24.59x
Duffus 3 160.43x
Friern Barnet 3 99.67x
Nigg 3 638.30x
Roberton 3 1111.11x
Drainie 2 106.38x
Eddrachillis 2 281.69x
New Spynie 2 263.16x
Banff 1 40.65x
Broughton In Salford 1 6.75x
Cromarty 1 100.00x
Deskford 1 243.90x
Drumoak 1 227.27x
Rothiemay 1 156.25x
Salford 1 2.10x
Tarves 1 83.33x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Goodbrand surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 2
Ada 1
Alice 1
Ann 1
Bertha 1
Emma 1
Margret 1
Mary 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Goodbrand surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 2
Charles 1
George 1
Walter 1
Wm. 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Goodbrand households.

FAQ

Goodbrand surname: questions and answers

How common was the Goodbrand surname in 1881?

In 1881, 142 people were recorded with the Goodbrand surname. That placed it at #16,012 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Goodbrand surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 283 in 2016. That gives Goodbrand a modern rank of #15,359.

What does the Goodbrand map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Goodbrand bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.