NameCensus.

UK surname

Hagyard

In the 1881 census there were 69 people recorded with the Hagyard surname, ranking it #23,816 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 178, ranked #21,160, up from #23,816 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to St Cuthbert and St Giles, Londesborough (incl. Thorpe East) and St Denis in Walmgate, St George. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Kingston upon Hull, Wakefield and Bradford.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Hagyard is 179 in 1997. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 158.0%.

1881 census count

69

Ranked #23,816

Modern count

178

2016, ranked #21,160

Peak year

1997

179 bearers

Map years

4

1911 to 2016

Key insights

  • Hagyard had 69 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,816 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 178 in 2016, ranked #21,160.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 120 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Young Families in Industrial Towns.

Hagyard surname distribution map

The map shows where the Hagyard surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Hagyard surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Hagyard over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 9 #31,675
1861 historical 38 #29,216
1881 historical 69 #23,816
1891 historical 77 #27,169
1901 historical 92 #23,800
1911 historical 120 #20,447
1997 modern 179 #18,889
1998 modern 172 #19,883
1999 modern 176 #19,722
2000 modern 157 #21,146
2001 modern 158 #20,788
2002 modern 164 #20,687
2003 modern 147 #21,977
2004 modern 151 #21,720
2005 modern 150 #21,786
2006 modern 151 #21,818
2007 modern 154 #21,804
2008 modern 151 #22,323
2009 modern 153 #22,611
2010 modern 165 #22,026
2011 modern 174 #21,096
2012 modern 166 #21,683
2013 modern 170 #21,726
2014 modern 174 #21,561
2015 modern 172 #21,649
2016 modern 178 #21,160

Geography

Back to top

Where Hagyards are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around St Cuthbert and St Giles, Londesborough (incl. Thorpe East), St Denis in Walmgate, St George, Leeds and Pocklington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Kingston upon Hull, Wakefield, Bradford and Cowal North. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 St Cuthbert and St Giles Yorkshire, East Riding
2 Londesborough (incl. Thorpe East) Yorkshire, East Riding
3 St Denis in Walmgate, St George Yorkshire, East Riding
4 Leeds Yorkshire, West Riding
5 Pocklington Yorkshire, East Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Kingston upon Hull 008 Kingston upon Hull, City of
2 Wakefield 030 Wakefield
3 Bradford 012 Bradford
4 Cowal North Argyll and Bute
5 Bradford 007 Bradford

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Hagyard

These lists show first names that appear often with the Hagyard surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Hagyard

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Hagyard, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Young Families in Industrial Towns

Nationally, the Hagyard surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Young Families in Industrial Towns, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Hagyard household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods house predominantly young, UK-born individuals identifying with a White ethnic group with dependent children. Long-term disability and unpaid care are prevalent, and religious affiliations are uncommon. Housing is terraced or semi-detached and social rented sector housing is the norm. Unemployment is above the Supergroup average, and employment is principally in elementary occupations, as process plant and machine operatives, or in caring and leisure services. Educational attainment is low. The group is scattered throughout former industrial towns in the Midlands and the South Wales Valleys.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Hagyard is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Hagyard is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Hagyard falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Hagyard is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Hagyard, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Hagyard families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Hagyard surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 63 Hagyards recorded in 1881 and an index of 9.45x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 63 9.45x
Cambridgeshire 5 11.73x
Surrey 1 0.30x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Londesborough Cum in Yorkshire leads with 16 Hagyards recorded in 1881 and an index of 20000.00x.

Place Total Index
Londesborough Cum 16 20000.00x
Heworth 11 6470.59x
Falsgrave 8 816.33x
Pocklington 6 952.38x
Chesterton 5 381.68x
Scarborough 5 82.51x
York St George 4 754.72x
Nunburnholme 3 5000.00x
Bridlington 2 130.72x
Hayton 2 4000.00x
Heaton 2 277.78x
Bishop Wilton Cum 1 769.23x
Cranleigh 1 208.33x
Gate Fulford 1 64.10x
Sewerby Cum Marton 1 769.23x
Wensley 1 1428.57x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Hagyard surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 5
Mary 4
Jane 3
Sarah 3
Edith 2
Agnes 1
Alice 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Beatrice 1
Betsy 1
Elizebeth 1
Ellen 1
Emilie 1
Emily 1
Fanny 1
Hannah 1
Henrietta 1
Kate 1
Mabel 1
Margaret 1
Margeret 1
Maria 1
Martha 1
Minnie 1
Rachel 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Hagyard surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 7
Robert 4
William 3
George 2
James 2
Joseph 2
Robt. 2
Alf. 1
Arthur 1
Cecil 1
Edw. 1
Ernest 1
Harry 1
Henry 1
Thomas 1
Walter 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Hagyard households.

FAQ

Hagyard surname: questions and answers

How common was the Hagyard surname in 1881?

In 1881, 69 people were recorded with the Hagyard surname. That placed it at #23,816 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Hagyard surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 178 in 2016. That gives Hagyard a modern rank of #21,160.

What does the Hagyard map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Hagyard bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.