NameCensus.

UK surname

Hater

A surname referring to one who harbors feelings of resentment or dislike towards others.

In the 1881 census there were 47 people recorded with the Hater surname, ranking it #27,019 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 13, ranked #37,278, down from #27,019 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Manchester, Brighton and Preston. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Hater is 760 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 72.3%.

1881 census count

47

Ranked #27,019

Modern count

13

2016, ranked #37,278

Peak year

1861

760 bearers

Map years

3

1851 to 1891

Key insights

  • Hater had 47 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #27,019 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 13 in 2016, ranked #37,278.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 760 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Hater surname distribution map

The map shows where the Hater surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Hater surname density by area, 1891 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Hater over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 239 #9,092
1861 historical 760 #3,598
1881 historical 47 #27,019
1891 historical 270 #12,027
1901 historical 26 #31,152
1911 historical 71 #25,742
1997 modern 6 #37,704
1998 modern 4 #38,082
1999 modern 4 #38,100
2000 modern 4 #38,004
2001 modern 4 #37,862
2002 modern 2 #38,400
2003 modern 2 #38,424
2004 modern 1 #38,771
2007 modern 2 #38,617
2008 modern 2 #38,673
2009 modern 1 #38,998
2010 modern 2 #38,775
2011 modern 4 #38,338
2012 modern 5 #38,167
2013 modern 8 #37,767
2014 modern 12 #37,355
2015 modern 13 #37,251
2016 modern 13 #37,278

Geography

Back to top

Where Haters are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Manchester, Brighton, Preston, Liverpool and St Matthew Bethnal Green. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Manchester Lancashire
2 Brighton Sussex
3 Preston Lancashire
4 Liverpool Lancashire
5 St Matthew Bethnal Green London (East Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Hater

These lists show first names that appear often with the Hater surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Hater

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Hater, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Hater surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Hater household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Hater is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Hater is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - Other

This describes the area pattern most associated with Hater, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Hater

The surname "Hater" is believed to have originated from the Middle English word "hater", which means "one who hates". This surname is thought to have first appeared in England during the late 13th century, likely as a descriptive name for someone with a particularly hateful or resentful personality.

One of the earliest recorded instances of the surname Hater can be found in the Subsidy Rolls of Worcestershire from 1327, where a John le Hater is listed. This suggests that the name may have initially been spelled with the prefix "le", which was common in Middle English surnames derived from occupations or personal characteristics.

In the 15th century, the surname Hater appears in various records from the county of Gloucestershire, including the Inquisitiones Post Mortem from 1442, which mentions a Thomas Hater. This indicates that the surname had spread to other parts of England during this period.

By the 16th century, the surname Hater had become more widespread, with records showing individuals bearing this name in various regions of England. One notable example is Robert Hater, a merchant from London who is mentioned in the Lay Subsidy Rolls of 1567.

In the 17th century, the Hater surname can be found in several parish records and court documents. For instance, the marriage of William Hater and Elizabeth Smyth is recorded in the parish registers of St. Mary's Church in Warwick in 1632. Additionally, a John Hater is mentioned in the Quarter Sessions Records of Wiltshire in 1674, indicating that the surname had spread to different parts of the country.

One of the earliest known individuals with the surname Hater was Thomas Hater, born in 1492 in Gloucestershire. Another notable figure was Elizabeth Hater, a midwife from London who lived during the late 16th century and was mentioned in several court records from the time.

In the 18th century, the Hater surname continued to be present in various regions of England. For example, the baptismal records of St. Mary's Church in Cheltenham list the birth of Samuel Hater in 1712. Additionally, a William Hater is mentioned in the land tax records of Oxfordshire in 1768.

By the 19th century, the Hater surname had spread beyond England, with records showing individuals bearing this name in other parts of the United Kingdom and even in some parts of North America. One notable figure from this period was John Hater, a Scottish-born writer and poet who lived from 1822 to 1892.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Hater families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Hater surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 20 Haters recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.36x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 20 4.36x
Kent 7 4.48x
Surrey 5 2.24x
Lancashire 4 0.74x
Glamorgan 3 3.76x
Norfolk 2 2.84x
Staffordshire 2 1.29x
Hampshire 1 1.06x
Shropshire 1 2.53x
Warwickshire 1 0.87x
Yorkshire 1 0.22x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Islington London in Middlesex leads with 6 Haters recorded in 1881 and an index of 13.50x.

Place Total Index
Islington London 6 13.50x
Speldhurst 6 750.00x
St Marylebone London 6 24.52x
Chiswick 5 200.00x
Camberwell 4 13.66x
Oldham 4 22.78x
Clase 3 101.01x
Norwich St George Tombland 2 1666.67x
Wednesbury 2 51.68x
Ampleforth Oswaldkirk 1 2000.00x
Birmingham 1 2.60x
Boldre 1 294.12x
Croydon 1 8.06x
Deptford St Paul 1 8.29x
Friern Barnet 1 99.01x
Isleworth 1 49.02x
Shrewsbury Holy Cross 1 227.27x
St George Bloomsbury 1 38.02x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Hater surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 4
Mary 4
Emma 3
Annie 2
Ellen 2
Emily 2
Sarah 2
Ada 1
Florence 1
M. 1
Margaret 1
Rose 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Hater surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 3
Joseph 3
William 3
Albert 2
Edward 2
Charles 1
Cyrus 1
Frank 1
Henery 1
Henry 1
James 1
Jonathan 1
Sidney 1
Thomas 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Hater surname: questions and answers

How common was the Hater surname in 1881?

In 1881, 47 people were recorded with the Hater surname. That placed it at #27,019 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Hater surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 13 in 2016. That gives Hater a modern rank of #37,278.

What does the Hater surname mean?

A surname referring to one who harbors feelings of resentment or dislike towards others.

What does the Hater map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Hater bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.