NameCensus.

UK surname

Hitcham

In the 1881 census there were 86 people recorded with the Hitcham surname, ranking it #21,449 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 104, ranked #30,317, down from #21,449 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Kessingland, Gateshead and Gisleham. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Waveney.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Hitcham is 240 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 20.9%.

1881 census count

86

Ranked #21,449

Modern count

104

2016, ranked #30,317

Peak year

1861

240 bearers

Map years

7

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Hitcham had 86 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #21,449 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 104 in 2016, ranked #30,317.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 240 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Hitcham surname distribution map

The map shows where the Hitcham surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Hitcham surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Hitcham over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 62 #22,232
1861 historical 240 #10,226
1881 historical 86 #21,449
1891 historical 177 #16,330
1901 historical 121 #20,444
1911 historical 134 #19,131
1997 modern 132 #22,821
1998 modern 123 #24,449
1999 modern 126 #24,239
2000 modern 124 #24,469
2001 modern 122 #24,366
2002 modern 124 #24,616
2003 modern 115 #25,538
2004 modern 114 #25,870
2005 modern 111 #26,260
2006 modern 103 #27,785
2007 modern 107 #27,557
2008 modern 108 #27,684
2009 modern 115 #27,207
2010 modern 117 #27,557
2011 modern 112 #28,117
2012 modern 107 #29,017
2013 modern 111 #28,856
2014 modern 110 #29,294
2015 modern 107 #29,708
2016 modern 104 #30,317

Geography

Back to top

Where Hitchams are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Kessingland, Gateshead, Gisleham, Great Budworth (Witton with Twambrook), Davenham (Leftwich) and Dalton-in-Furness. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Waveney. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Kessingland Suffolk
2 Gateshead Durham
3 Gisleham Suffolk
4 Great Budworth (Witton with Twambrook), Davenham (Leftwich) Cheshire
5 Dalton-in-Furness Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Waveney 003 Waveney
2 Waveney 002 Waveney
3 Waveney 005 Waveney
4 Waveney 004 Waveney
5 Waveney 007 Waveney

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Hitcham

These lists show first names that appear often with the Hitcham surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Hitcham

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Hitcham, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Hitcham surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Hitcham household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Hitcham is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Hitcham is most concentrated in decile 4 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

4
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Hitcham falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Hitcham is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Hitcham, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Hitcham families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Hitcham surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Suffolk leads with 33 Hitchams recorded in 1881 and an index of 31.92x.

County Total Index
Suffolk 33 31.92x
Middlesex 11 1.30x
Durham 8 3.17x
Kent 7 2.42x
Lancashire 7 0.70x
Leicestershire 6 6.38x
Yorkshire 5 0.59x
Norfolk 4 3.07x
Surrey 3 0.73x
Oxfordshire 1 1.91x
Royal Navy 1 9.89x
Worcestershire 1 0.90x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Kessingland in Suffolk leads with 12 Hitchams recorded in 1881 and an index of 3333.33x.

Place Total Index
Kessingland 12 3333.33x
Pakefield 9 3461.54x
Westoe 8 55.91x
Folkestone 7 124.56x
Lowestoft 7 143.44x
Leicester St Margaret 6 26.14x
Gisleham 5 5555.56x
Ruswarp 5 531.91x
St Marylebone London 5 11.04x
Camberwell 3 5.53x
Habergham Eaves 3 32.61x
Ince In Makerfield 3 63.97x
Rockland St Mary 3 2307.69x
Hornsey 2 18.64x
St George Hanover Square 2 13.38x
Bethnal Green London 1 2.71x
Emneth 1 344.83x
Gradley 1 185.19x
Hulme 1 4.76x
Paddington London 1 3.21x
Royal Navy 1 11.57x
Swerford 1 833.33x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Hitcham surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 10
Charlotte 4
Alice 3
Elizabeth 3
Anna 2
Anne 2
Isabella 2
Jane 2
Kate 2
Sarah 2
Ada 1
Agnes 1
Amelia 1
Ann 1
Eliza 1
Emily 1
Ethel 1
Helen 1
Laura 1
Leorna 1
Margaret 1
Phebe 1
Phoebe 1
Rachel 1
Rebecca 1
Robertina 1
Susan 1
Susannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Hitcham surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 6
John 3
Robert 3
William 3
Frederick 2
Henry 2
Jonathan 2
Robt. 2
Robt.S. 2
Thomas 2
Alfred 1
Ernest 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Fred 1
Harry 1
James 1
Peter 1
Samuel 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Hitcham surname: questions and answers

How common was the Hitcham surname in 1881?

In 1881, 86 people were recorded with the Hitcham surname. That placed it at #21,449 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Hitcham surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 104 in 2016. That gives Hitcham a modern rank of #30,317.

What does the Hitcham map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Hitcham bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.