NameCensus.

UK surname

Hogger

In the 1881 census there were 116 people recorded with the Hogger surname, ranking it #18,126 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 279, ranked #15,534, up from #18,126 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Brent Eleigh, London parishes and Lavenham. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Suffolk Coastal, Mid Suffolk and Tower Hamlets.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Hogger is 304 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 140.5%.

1881 census count

116

Ranked #18,126

Modern count

279

2016, ranked #15,534

Peak year

1998

304 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Hogger had 116 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #18,126 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 279 in 2016, ranked #15,534.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 294 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Hogger surname distribution map

The map shows where the Hogger surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Hogger surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Hogger over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 66 #21,617
1861 historical 136 #16,556
1881 historical 116 #18,126
1891 historical 197 #15,101
1901 historical 219 #14,292
1911 historical 294 #11,622
1997 modern 287 #13,912
1998 modern 304 #13,773
1999 modern 303 #13,873
2000 modern 286 #14,385
2001 modern 293 #13,933
2002 modern 284 #14,524
2003 modern 285 #14,295
2004 modern 276 #14,684
2005 modern 268 #14,905
2006 modern 257 #15,448
2007 modern 270 #15,080
2008 modern 264 #15,468
2009 modern 279 #15,184
2010 modern 270 #15,896
2011 modern 263 #16,058
2012 modern 271 #15,628
2013 modern 277 #15,644
2014 modern 274 #15,877
2015 modern 274 #15,749
2016 modern 279 #15,534

Geography

Back to top

Where Hoggers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Brent Eleigh, London parishes, Lavenham and Playford. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Suffolk Coastal, Mid Suffolk, Tower Hamlets and Harrogate. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Brent Eleigh Suffolk
2 London parishes London 1
3 Lavenham Suffolk
4 London parishes London 3
5 Playford Suffolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Suffolk Coastal 006 Suffolk Coastal
2 Mid Suffolk 008 Mid Suffolk
3 Tower Hamlets 007 Tower Hamlets
4 Harrogate 004 Harrogate
5 Tower Hamlets 028 Tower Hamlets

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Hogger

These lists show first names that appear often with the Hogger surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Hogger

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Hogger, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Hogger surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Hogger household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Hogger is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Hogger is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Hogger falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Hogger is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Hogger, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Hogger families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Hogger surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Suffolk leads with 49 Hoggers recorded in 1881 and an index of 35.56x.

County Total Index
Suffolk 49 35.56x
Middlesex 22 1.94x
Cambridgeshire 13 18.14x
Norfolk 11 6.32x
Hampshire 8 3.45x
Dorset 6 8.08x
Kent 4 1.04x
Essex 2 0.90x
Somerset 1 0.55x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. St Andrewthe Less in Cambridgeshire leads with 11 Hoggers recorded in 1881 and an index of 134.31x.

Place Total Index
St Andrewthe Less 11 134.31x
Stowmarket 11 691.82x
Bethnal Green London 9 18.31x
Barnham 8 4444.44x
Shimpling 8 4210.53x
St George Hanover Square 8 40.12x
Brandon 6 645.16x
Catherington 6 1176.47x
Lavenham 6 833.33x
Portland 6 150.38x
Gayton 5 1724.14x
Hadleigh 4 298.51x
Lewisham 4 19.43x
Grundisburgh 3 937.50x
Playford 3 3333.33x
Woodbridge 3 170.45x
Hammersmith London 2 7.18x
Portsea 2 4.40x
St Clement Cambridge 2 666.67x
Abberton 1 1111.11x
Colchester St Giles 1 45.25x
Fulham London 1 6.09x
Ipswich St Margaret 1 21.37x
Ipswich St Mathew 1 25.91x
Islington London 1 0.91x
Ringshall 1 769.23x
St Pancras London 1 1.10x
Walcot 1 10.31x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Hogger surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 5
Annie 4
Elizabeth 4
Alice 3
Emily 3
Mary 3
Anne 2
Ellen 2
Jane 2
Laura 2
Susanna 2
Ada 1
Agnes 1
Allice 1
Amelia 1
Amy 1
Ann 1
Anna 1
Fanny 1
Flora 1
Francis 1
Harriet 1
Jemima 1
Lizzie 1
Lois 1
Louisa 1
Margarete 1
Martha 1
Minnie 1
Miriam 1
Nellie 1
Rebecca 1
Rosettely 1
Theresa 1
Threasa 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Hogger surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Hogger surname: questions and answers

How common was the Hogger surname in 1881?

In 1881, 116 people were recorded with the Hogger surname. That placed it at #18,126 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Hogger surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 279 in 2016. That gives Hogger a modern rank of #15,534.

What does the Hogger map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Hogger bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.