NameCensus.

UK surname

Hugman

In the 1881 census there were 74 people recorded with the Hugman surname, ranking it #23,062 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 159, ranked #22,798, up from #23,062 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Putney, London parishes and Halesworth. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Waveney.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Hugman is 177 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 114.9%.

1881 census count

74

Ranked #23,062

Modern count

159

2016, ranked #22,798

Peak year

2010

177 bearers

Map years

4

1911 to 2016

Key insights

  • Hugman had 74 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,062 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 159 in 2016, ranked #22,798.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 111 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Hugman surname distribution map

The map shows where the Hugman surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Hugman surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Hugman over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 69 #21,148
1861 historical 83 #23,189
1881 historical 74 #23,062
1891 historical 92 #25,109
1901 historical 95 #23,462
1911 historical 111 #21,392
1997 modern 159 #20,339
1998 modern 169 #20,104
1999 modern 171 #20,072
2000 modern 166 #20,426
2001 modern 163 #20,372
2002 modern 158 #21,178
2003 modern 149 #21,766
2004 modern 150 #21,830
2005 modern 147 #22,057
2006 modern 153 #21,643
2007 modern 155 #21,726
2008 modern 152 #22,225
2009 modern 162 #21,791
2010 modern 177 #21,034
2011 modern 164 #21,900
2012 modern 155 #22,762
2013 modern 148 #23,884
2014 modern 159 #22,930
2015 modern 159 #22,796
2016 modern 159 #22,798

Geography

Back to top

Where Hugmans are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Putney, London parishes, Halesworth and Hertford St Andrew within and without. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Waveney. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Putney London (South Districts)
2 London parishes London 1
3 London parishes London 3
4 Halesworth Suffolk
5 Hertford St Andrew within and without Hertfordshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Waveney 002 Waveney
2 Waveney 004 Waveney
3 Waveney 003 Waveney
4 Waveney 005 Waveney
5 Waveney 007 Waveney

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Hugman

These lists show first names that appear often with the Hugman surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Hugman

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Hugman, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Hugman surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Hugman household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Hugman is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Hugman is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Hugman falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Hugman is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Hugman, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Hugman families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Hugman surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 25 Hugmans recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.56x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 25 3.56x
Surrey 15 4.38x
Hertfordshire 14 28.92x
Suffolk 5 5.85x
Hampshire 4 2.78x
Norfolk 3 2.78x
Somerset 3 2.65x
Gloucestershire 1 0.73x
Lincolnshire 1 0.89x
Wiltshire 1 1.61x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Hertford St Andrew in Hertfordshire leads with 10 Hugmans recorded in 1881 and an index of 1666.67x.

Place Total Index
Hertford St Andrew 10 1666.67x
Putney 8 250.00x
Hackney London 7 17.78x
Hammersmith London 6 34.68x
Halesworth 5 819.67x
Newington 5 19.28x
Hanwell 4 320.00x
St George Bloomsbury 4 99.26x
Frome 3 111.11x
Great Amwell 3 612.24x
Islington London 3 4.41x
Norwich St Peter Southgate 3 2142.86x
Portsea 3 10.63x
Wandsworth 2 29.59x
Acton 1 24.27x
Clifton 1 14.37x
Horncastle 1 86.21x
Portsmouth 1 30.21x
Swindon 1 20.75x
Ware 1 71.94x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Hugman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 3
Sarah 3
Anne 2
Annie 2
Charlotte 2
Eliza 2
Emily 2
Mary 2
Alice 1
Ann 1
Anna 1
Beatrice 1
Bertha 1
Clara 1
Elizth. 1
Eva 1
Florence 1
Gertrude 1
Grace 1
Harriett 1
Helen 1
Isobella 1
Kate 1
Louisa 1
M.A. 1
Maria 1
Martha 1
Olive 1
Pheobe 1
Phoebe 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Hugman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 5
Charles 4
John 4
Robert 3
Herbert 2
Thomas 2
Alfred 1
Benjamin 1
Harry 1
Henry 1
Horace 1
James 1
Jno.Jos. 1
Nicholas 1
T. 1
Walter 1
Willm. 1
Wm.Jas. 1

FAQ

Hugman surname: questions and answers

How common was the Hugman surname in 1881?

In 1881, 74 people were recorded with the Hugman surname. That placed it at #23,062 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Hugman surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 159 in 2016. That gives Hugman a modern rank of #22,798.

What does the Hugman map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Hugman bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.