NameCensus.

UK surname

Jo

A Korean surname derived from the Chinese character 曺, meaning "assistant" or "to assist."

In the 1881 census there were 5 people recorded with the Jo surname, ranking it #33,110 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 263, ranked #16,210, up from #33,110 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to No data. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Kingston upon Thames, Wandsworth and Merton.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Jo is 263 in 2016. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 5160.0%.

1881 census count

5

Ranked #33,110

Modern count

263

2016, ranked #16,210

Peak year

2016

263 bearers

Map years

1

2016 to 2016

Key insights

  • Jo had 5 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #33,110 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 263 in 2016, ranked #16,210.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 5 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Ethnically Diverse Young Families.

Jo surname distribution map

The map shows where the Jo surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Jo surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Jo over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 5 #32,456
1881 historical 5 #33,110
1997 modern 18 #36,053
1998 modern 19 #36,009
1999 modern 11 #36,917
2000 modern 7 #37,430
2001 modern 7 #37,293
2002 modern 5 #37,723
2003 modern 14 #36,512
2004 modern 21 #35,969
2005 modern 23 #35,924
2006 modern 18 #36,412
2007 modern 23 #36,142
2008 modern 43 #34,931
2009 modern 44 #35,028
2010 modern 70 #33,480
2011 modern 75 #33,071
2012 modern 122 #26,696
2013 modern 139 #24,912
2014 modern 165 #22,356
2015 modern 195 #19,909
2016 modern 263 #16,210

Geography

Back to top

Where Jos are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around No data. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Kingston upon Thames, Wandsworth, Merton, Richmond upon Thames and Ealing. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 No data No data

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Kingston upon Thames 007 Kingston upon Thames
2 Wandsworth 035 Wandsworth
3 Merton 016 Merton
4 Richmond upon Thames 005 Richmond upon Thames
5 Ealing 027 Ealing

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Jo

These lists show first names that appear often with the Jo surname in historical and recent records.

Historical female names

No Forenames Found

Historical male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Jo

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Jo, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Multicultural and Educated Urbanites

Group

Ethnically Diverse Young Families

Nationally, the Jo surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Ethnically Diverse Young Families, within Multicultural and Educated Urbanites. This does not mean every Jo household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group includes many younger parents born overseas (particularly in Africa or EU countries) with children aged 0-4. Individuals identifying as of Mixed or Multiple ethnicities are also common. English may not be the primary language spoken. Accommodation consists principally of flats, and many properties are socially rented and/or overcrowded. Students are also present, unemployment is common, and other adults tend to work in low skilled jobs.

Wider pattern

Established populations comprising ethnic minorities together with persons born outside the UK predominate in this Supergroup. Residents present diverse personal characteristics and circumstances: while generally well-educated and practising skilled occupations, some residents live in overcrowded rental sector housing. English may not be the main language used by people in this Group. Although the typical adult resident is middle aged, single person households are common and marriage rates are low by national standards. This Supergroup predominates in Inner London, with smaller enclaves in many other densely populated metropolitan areas.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Jo is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Jo is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Jo falls in decile 3 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

3
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Jo is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
Other Ethnic Group

This describes the area pattern most associated with Jo, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Jo

The surname "Jo" is believed to have its origins in the Middle East, specifically in the region of Anatolia, which is now part of modern-day Turkey. The name is thought to have emerged during the Byzantine era, around the 5th to 6th century AD.

One of the earliest known references to the name "Jo" can be found in ancient Greek manuscripts, where it was used as a shortened form of the name "Ioannes," which was derived from the Hebrew name "Yohanan," meaning "Graced by God." This name was also transliterated into Latin as "Johannes" and later became popular in various European languages, including English, as "John."

The surname "Jo" is believed to have been adopted by families who had ancestral ties to the region of Anatolia or who were descendants of individuals with the given name "Ioannes" or its variants. As these families migrated to different parts of the world, the surname "Jo" spread and evolved, taking on various spellings and pronunciations.

In the 12th century, records show that a noble family from the Byzantine Empire, known as the Jos, held significant power and influence in the region. One notable member of this family was Alexios Jo, who served as a military commander and governor during the reign of Emperor Manuel I Komnenos (1143-1180).

Another prominent figure bearing the surname "Jo" was John Jo, a 14th-century scholar and theologian from Constantinople. He was known for his writings on theology and philosophy, and his works were widely circulated throughout the Byzantine Empire and beyond.

During the Ottoman period, which began in the late 13th century, the surname "Jo" continued to be used by families of both Greek and Turkish descent. One notable example is Hasan Jo, a 16th-century Ottoman architect who was responsible for the design and construction of several mosques and other buildings in Istanbul and other parts of the Ottoman Empire.

In the 18th century, the surname "Jo" can be found in records from various parts of Europe, particularly in areas with significant Greek or Turkish immigrant communities. For instance, a merchant named Petros Jo was recorded as living in Venice, Italy, in the mid-1700s, where he was involved in the lucrative trade between the Ottoman Empire and the Italian city-states.

As the name "Jo" spread across the globe due to migration and the expansion of trade routes, it took on different variations and spellings, such as "Joh," "Joo," and "Yoh." Notable individuals with these variations of the surname include the 19th-century British explorer and writer, Thomas Joh, who documented his travels through South America, and the 20th-century American artist, Emily Joo, whose abstract paintings gained international recognition.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

FAQ

Jo surname: questions and answers

How common was the Jo surname in 1881?

In 1881, 5 people were recorded with the Jo surname. That placed it at #33,110 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Jo surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 263 in 2016. That gives Jo a modern rank of #16,210.

What does the Jo surname mean?

A Korean surname derived from the Chinese character 曺, meaning "assistant" or "to assist."

What does the Jo map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Jo bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.