NameCensus.

UK surname

Kidley

In the 1881 census there were 91 people recorded with the Kidley surname, ranking it #20,843 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 126, ranked #26,686, down from #20,843 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos), St Osyth and Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Caerphilly, Mid Devon and Rhondda Cynon Taf.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Kidley is 164 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 38.5%.

1881 census count

91

Ranked #20,843

Modern count

126

2016, ranked #26,686

Peak year

1861

164 bearers

Map years

7

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Kidley had 91 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #20,843 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 126 in 2016, ranked #26,686.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 164 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Kidley surname distribution map

The map shows where the Kidley surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Kidley surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Kidley over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 83 #19,181
1861 historical 164 #14,188
1881 historical 91 #20,843
1891 historical 156 #17,842
1901 historical 103 #22,444
1911 historical 148 #18,023
1997 modern 112 #25,244
1998 modern 120 #24,793
1999 modern 120 #24,960
2000 modern 122 #24,698
2001 modern 123 #24,242
2002 modern 120 #25,110
2003 modern 116 #25,415
2004 modern 109 #26,607
2005 modern 112 #26,114
2006 modern 104 #27,646
2007 modern 105 #27,868
2008 modern 109 #27,533
2009 modern 115 #27,207
2010 modern 117 #27,557
2011 modern 118 #27,192
2012 modern 112 #28,174
2013 modern 118 #27,686
2014 modern 127 #26,634
2015 modern 124 #26,944
2016 modern 126 #26,686

Geography

Back to top

Where Kidleys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos), St Osyth, Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, London parishes and Toxteth Park. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Caerphilly, Mid Devon and Rhondda Cynon Taf. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos) Glamorganshire
2 St Osyth Essex
3 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
4 London parishes London 3
5 Toxteth Park Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Caerphilly 022 Caerphilly
2 Caerphilly 019 Caerphilly
3 Mid Devon 006 Mid Devon
4 Caerphilly 004 Caerphilly
5 Rhondda Cynon Taf 030 Rhondda Cynon Taf

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Kidley

These lists show first names that appear often with the Kidley surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Kidley

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Kidley, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Kidley surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Kidley household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Kidley is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Kidley is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Kidley falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Kidley is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 20-25 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

4
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Kidley, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Kidley families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Kidley surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Surrey leads with 29 Kidleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 6.71x.

County Total Index
Surrey 29 6.71x
Lancashire 17 1.61x
Middlesex 8 0.90x
Essex 5 2.85x
Hertfordshire 5 8.17x
Warwickshire 5 2.23x
Durham 4 1.51x
Monmouthshire 4 6.23x
Gloucestershire 3 1.72x
Suffolk 3 2.78x
Herefordshire 2 5.50x
Yorkshire 2 0.23x
Leicestershire 1 1.02x
Northamptonshire 1 1.20x
Nottinghamshire 1 0.84x
Sussex 1 0.67x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Newington in Surrey leads with 19 Kidleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 57.94x.

Place Total Index
Newington 19 57.94x
Kirkdale 10 56.43x
Camberwell 7 12.35x
Toxteth Park 6 16.83x
Birmingham 5 6.70x
Broxbourne 5 413.22x
St Osyth 5 1162.79x
Islington London 4 4.65x
Dawdon 3 92.31x
Southwark St Saviour 3 65.79x
Clifton 2 22.73x
Ecclesall Bierlow 2 11.18x
Hackney London 2 4.02x
Hadleigh 2 190.48x
Hereford All Sts 2 119.76x
Raglan 2 909.09x
Barkestone 1 1111.11x
Bristol St James In 1 39.06x
Clytha 1 1111.11x
Edmonton 1 13.99x
Hastings St Mary 1 26.88x
Hedworth Monkton Jarrow 1 8.74x
Liverpool 1 1.56x
Llanarth 1 1428.57x
Northampton Priory St 1 19.96x
Nottingham St Peter 1 75.19x
St George Hanover Square 1 6.39x
Sudbury St Gregory 1 114.94x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Kidley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Kidley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 11
Thomas 5
John 4
Arthur 3
Edward 3
Robert 3
Walter 3
Charles 2
Frederick 2
George 2
Henry 2
Joseph 2
Alexander 1
Francis 1
Fred 1
Herbert 1
Ivison 1
Michael 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Kidley surname: questions and answers

How common was the Kidley surname in 1881?

In 1881, 91 people were recorded with the Kidley surname. That placed it at #20,843 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Kidley surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 126 in 2016. That gives Kidley a modern rank of #26,686.

What does the Kidley map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Kidley bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.