NameCensus.

UK surname

Kislingbury

In the 1881 census there were 72 people recorded with the Kislingbury surname, ranking it #23,371 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 82, ranked #32,895, down from #23,371 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, London parishes and Binfield. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Kislingbury is 136 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 13.9%.

1881 census count

72

Ranked #23,371

Modern count

82

2016, ranked #32,895

Peak year

1911

136 bearers

Map years

3

1891 to 1911

Key insights

  • Kislingbury had 72 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,371 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 82 in 2016, ranked #32,895.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 136 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Kislingbury surname distribution map

The map shows where the Kislingbury surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Kislingbury surname density by area, 1911 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Kislingbury over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 85 #18,940
1861 historical 76 #24,114
1881 historical 72 #23,371
1891 historical 102 #23,719
1901 historical 122 #20,344
1911 historical 136 #18,962
1997 modern 80 #29,554
1998 modern 76 #30,386
1999 modern 82 #29,933
2000 modern 79 #30,249
2001 modern 79 #30,065
2002 modern 80 #30,387
2003 modern 87 #29,615
2004 modern 89 #29,623
2005 modern 77 #31,156
2006 modern 78 #31,385
2007 modern 82 #31,295
2008 modern 82 #31,597
2009 modern 84 #31,842
2010 modern 84 #32,289
2011 modern 85 #32,127
2012 modern 85 #32,395
2013 modern 82 #32,903
2014 modern 83 #32,910
2015 modern 83 #32,847
2016 modern 82 #32,895

Geography

Back to top

Where Kislingburys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, London parishes, Binfield, Reading St Giles, Shinfield (East and West Side, Hartley Dammer), Sonning (Early), and St Leonard. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
2 London parishes London 3
3 Binfield Berkshire
4 Reading St Giles, Shinfield (East and West Side, Hartley Dammer), Sonning (Early), Berkshire
5 St Leonard Berkshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Kislingbury

These lists show first names that appear often with the Kislingbury surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Kislingbury

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Kislingbury, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Kislingbury surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Kislingbury household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Kislingbury is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Kislingbury is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Kislingbury, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Kislingbury families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Kislingbury surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Surrey leads with 27 Kislingburys recorded in 1881 and an index of 7.89x.

County Total Index
Surrey 27 7.89x
Berkshire 19 36.04x
Middlesex 11 1.57x
Monmouthshire 8 15.76x
Oxfordshire 6 13.83x
Kent 1 0.42x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Windlesham in Surrey leads with 17 Kislingburys recorded in 1881 and an index of 2656.25x.

Place Total Index
Windlesham 17 2656.25x
Trevethin 8 167.01x
East Ilsley 6 4285.71x
Headington 6 895.52x
Wallingford St Leonard 5 2000.00x
Bisley 4 2500.00x
Paddington London 4 15.49x
Binfield 3 750.00x
Finchley 3 111.52x
Newington 3 11.57x
Cobham 2 357.14x
Kensington London 2 5.12x
Reading St Giles 2 38.68x
Sonning 2 344.83x
Beckenham 1 31.95x
Chelsea London 1 4.73x
Moulsford 1 2500.00x
Staines 1 90.09x
Woking 1 48.54x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Kislingbury surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 5
Eliza 3
Jane 3
Maria 3
Elizabeth 2
Emily 2
Agnes 1
Angerona 1
Ann 1
Anne 1
Betsy 1
Charlotte 1
Clara 1
Elfrida 1
Elizth.A. 1
Ellen 1
Florency 1
Harriet 1
Harriett 1
Julia 1
Kate 1
Lucy 1
Mabel 1
Martha 1
Nelly 1
Olive 1
Page 1
Rachel 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Kislingbury surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 6
James 4
Charles 3
Herbert 3
Arthur 2
Alfred 1
Andrew 1
Arnold 1
Edward 1
Edwin 1
Ernest 1
Francis 1
Fred 1
Frederick 1
Fredk.W. 1
Henry 1
John 1
Robert 1
Wm. 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Kislingbury households.

FAQ

Kislingbury surname: questions and answers

How common was the Kislingbury surname in 1881?

In 1881, 72 people were recorded with the Kislingbury surname. That placed it at #23,371 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Kislingbury surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 82 in 2016. That gives Kislingbury a modern rank of #32,895.

What does the Kislingbury map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Kislingbury bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.