NameCensus.

UK surname

Less

A surname derived from the Middle English word meaning "small" or "little".

In the 1881 census there were 24 people recorded with the Less surname, ranking it #30,215 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 57, ranked #34,511, down from #30,215 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Calverley, Christ Church Spitalfields and St Pancras. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Less is 137 in 1901. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 137.5%.

1881 census count

24

Ranked #30,215

Modern count

57

2016, ranked #34,511

Peak year

1901

137 bearers

Map years

2

1891 to 1901

Key insights

  • Less had 24 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #30,215 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 57 in 2016, ranked #34,511.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 137 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Less surname distribution map

The map shows where the Less surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Less surname density by area, 1901 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Less over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 48 #24,615
1861 historical 93 #22,009
1881 historical 24 #30,215
1891 historical 102 #23,719
1901 historical 137 #19,032
1911 historical 82 #24,635
1997 modern 70 #30,618
1998 modern 67 #31,282
1999 modern 64 #31,692
2000 modern 47 #33,358
2001 modern 44 #33,490
2002 modern 44 #33,790
2003 modern 41 #34,113
2004 modern 41 #34,306
2005 modern 37 #34,815
2006 modern 40 #34,854
2007 modern 41 #34,974
2008 modern 40 #35,137
2009 modern 39 #35,321
2010 modern 39 #35,451
2011 modern 43 #35,228
2012 modern 48 #34,938
2013 modern 50 #34,891
2014 modern 46 #35,155
2015 modern 51 #34,834
2016 modern 57 #34,511

Geography

Back to top

Where Less' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Calverley, Christ Church Spitalfields, St Pancras, Edinburgh and Dundee, Liff, Benvie and Invergowry. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Calverley Yorkshire, West Riding
2 Christ Church Spitalfields London (East Districts)
3 St Pancras London (North Districts)
4 Edinburgh Edinburgh
5 Dundee, Liff, Benvie and Invergowry Forfar

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Less

These lists show first names that appear often with the Less surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Less

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Less, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Less surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Less household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Less is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Less is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - Other

This describes the area pattern most associated with Less, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Less

The surname Less originated in England and has Anglo-Saxon roots. It is derived from the Old English word "lǽs," which means "pasture" or "meadow." The name likely referred to someone who lived near a pasture or meadow, or perhaps someone who tended livestock in such an area.

The earliest recorded mention of the surname Less can be found in the Domesday Book of 1086, which was a comprehensive survey of landowners and tenants in England commissioned by William the Conqueror. The Domesday Book includes several entries for individuals with the surname Less or similar spellings, such as Lesse or Lesse.

In the 13th century, the surname Less appeared in various records and documents, including the Hundred Rolls of 1273, which were administrative records from the time of King Edward I. These rolls list several individuals with the surname Less residing in various counties across England, such as Oxfordshire, Gloucestershire, and Wiltshire.

One notable figure with the surname Less was John Less, a 15th-century English churchman and academic. He was born in Hertfordshire around 1420 and served as the Master of Clare College, Cambridge from 1463 until his death in 1478.

Another individual with the surname Less was William Less, an English soldier and explorer who lived in the late 16th century. He is best known for his participation in Sir Walter Raleigh's expeditions to the Americas, and he is said to have played a role in the establishment of the Roanoke Colony in present-day North Carolina.

In the 17th century, the surname Less can be found in various parish records and other documents. For example, a man named Thomas Less was born in Dorset, England, in 1632, and he later emigrated to the American colonies, settling in Virginia in the 1650s.

Another notable person with the surname Less was Richard Less, an English writer and clergyman who lived in the late 17th and early 18th centuries. He was born in Berkshire in 1670 and is best known for his work "The Ceremonial Laws of Christ's House," which was published in 1719.

Throughout history, the surname Less has also been associated with various place names and locations, particularly in England. For instance, there is a village called Lessingham in Norfolk, which likely derived its name from the Old English words "lǽs" and "inga," meaning "the people of the meadow."

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Less families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Less surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 7 Less' recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.23x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 7 4.23x
Worcestershire 4 18.49x
Yorkshire 2 1.22x
East Lothian 1 45.66x
Kent 1 1.77x
Lancashire 1 0.51x
Staffordshire 1 1.79x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Spitalfields London in Middlesex leads with 7 Less' recorded in 1881 and an index of 560.00x.

Place Total Index
Spitalfields London 7 560.00x
Kidderminster Borough 4 314.96x
Attercliffe Cum Darnall 2 130.72x
Liverpool 1 8.38x
Plumstead 1 53.19x
Tamworth 1 333.33x
Tranent 1 333.33x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Less surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Clara 1
Clarah 1
Elizabeth 1
Mary 1
Phoebey 1
Zilpha 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Less surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Benjamin 1
George 1
Harry 1
Henry 1
Jalle 1
James 1
John 1
Lewis 1
Morris 1
Samuel 1

FAQ

Less surname: questions and answers

How common was the Less surname in 1881?

In 1881, 24 people were recorded with the Less surname. That placed it at #30,215 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Less surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 57 in 2016. That gives Less a modern rank of #34,511.

What does the Less surname mean?

A surname derived from the Middle English word meaning "small" or "little".

What does the Less map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Less bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.