NameCensus.

UK surname

Loat

In the 1881 census there were 61 people recorded with the Loat surname, ranking it #24,992 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 131, ranked #26,004, down from #24,992 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Wolverhampton, Northfield and Dudley. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Bromsgrove, Havant and Lancaster.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Loat is 144 in 2004. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 114.8%.

1881 census count

61

Ranked #24,992

Modern count

131

2016, ranked #26,004

Peak year

2004

144 bearers

Map years

4

1911 to 2016

Key insights

  • Loat had 61 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #24,992 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 131 in 2016, ranked #26,004.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 126 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Loat surname distribution map

The map shows where the Loat surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Loat surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Loat over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 35 #27,037
1861 historical 40 #28,970
1881 historical 61 #24,992
1891 historical 91 #25,239
1901 historical 92 #23,800
1911 historical 126 #19,831
1997 modern 113 #25,106
1998 modern 121 #24,677
1999 modern 124 #24,508
2000 modern 131 #23,672
2001 modern 125 #24,011
2002 modern 130 #23,903
2003 modern 142 #22,460
2004 modern 144 #22,379
2005 modern 129 #23,963
2006 modern 126 #24,493
2007 modern 121 #25,469
2008 modern 121 #25,785
2009 modern 130 #25,176
2010 modern 132 #25,519
2011 modern 138 #24,615
2012 modern 131 #25,439
2013 modern 126 #26,585
2014 modern 126 #26,781
2015 modern 126 #26,654
2016 modern 131 #26,004

Geography

Back to top

Where Loats are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Wolverhampton, Northfield, Dudley, London parishes and Lee. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Bromsgrove, Havant, Lancaster and North Devon. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Wolverhampton Staffordshire
2 Northfield Worcestershire
3 Dudley Staffordshire
4 London parishes London 3
5 Lee London (South Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Bromsgrove 011 Bromsgrove
2 Havant 014 Havant
3 Bromsgrove 013 Bromsgrove
4 Lancaster 017 Lancaster
5 North Devon 013 North Devon

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Loat

These lists show first names that appear often with the Loat surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Loat

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Loat, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Loat surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Loat household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles

Group

Inner London Working Professionals

Within London, Loat is most associated with areas classed as Inner London Working Professionals, part of Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These primarily Inner London neighbourhoods are more densely populated than the Supergroup average. Residents have a younger over-all age profile than the Supergroup as a whole, and are less likely to be owner occupiers. Full time employment is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup and multiple car ownership is uncommon. Chinese and non-EU-born European migrants are less in evidence than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

These neighbourhoods house people of all ages, predominantly of White British or European extraction. Resident turnover is low. Religious affiliation is less common than average and tends to be Christian if expressed. Homeownership, typically of terraced houses, is common but use of the social rented sector is not. Employment is typically in professional, managerial and associate professional or technical occupations. There are few full-time students. Level 4 qualifications are common. More households lack dependent children than have them which, considered alongside low levels of crowding and over-all age structure, indicates that many households may be post child-rearing and in late middle age. Incidence of disability is low, as is residence in communal establishments.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Loat is most concentrated in decile 1 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

1
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Loat falls in decile 3 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

3
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Loat is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Loat, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Loat families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Loat surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Worcestershire leads with 22 Loats recorded in 1881 and an index of 28.33x.

County Total Index
Worcestershire 22 28.33x
Staffordshire 16 7.97x
Surrey 13 4.49x
Kent 8 3.94x
Middlesex 1 0.17x
Shropshire 1 1.95x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bromsgrove in Worcestershire leads with 22 Loats recorded in 1881 and an index of 842.91x.

Place Total Index
Bromsgrove 22 842.91x
Kingswinford 10 137.17x
Lambeth 8 15.43x
Lee 8 271.19x
Willenhall 5 132.98x
Streatham 3 68.03x
Croydon 1 6.22x
Islington London 1 1.73x
Leatherhead 1 136.99x
Oldbury 1 2000.00x
Upper Penn 1 200.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Loat surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 7
Ann 2
Sarah 2
Annie 1
Bertha 1
Clara 1
Clare 1
Eliza 1
Emily 1
Emma 1
Fanny 1
H. 1
Harriot 1
Jane 1
Louisa 1
Luisa 1
Margaret 1
Marian 1
Mary 1
Pauline 1
Rosa 1
Selina 1
Violet 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Loat surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Loat surname: questions and answers

How common was the Loat surname in 1881?

In 1881, 61 people were recorded with the Loat surname. That placed it at #24,992 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Loat surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 131 in 2016. That gives Loat a modern rank of #26,004.

What does the Loat map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Loat bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.