NameCensus.

UK surname

Loseby

In the 1881 census there were 125 people recorded with the Loseby surname, ranking it #17,335 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 188, ranked #20,417, down from #17,335 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, Manchester and Nottingham St Mary. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Halton, Leeds and Leicester.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Loseby is 207 in 1901. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 50.4%.

1881 census count

125

Ranked #17,335

Modern count

188

2016, ranked #20,417

Peak year

1901

207 bearers

Map years

8

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Loseby had 125 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,335 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 188 in 2016, ranked #20,417.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 207 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established Mature Families.

Loseby surname distribution map

The map shows where the Loseby surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Loseby surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Loseby over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 112 #15,913
1861 historical 96 #21,648
1881 historical 125 #17,335
1891 historical 163 #17,300
1901 historical 207 #14,803
1911 historical 185 #15,686
1997 modern 193 #18,035
1998 modern 193 #18,511
1999 modern 187 #18,999
2000 modern 199 #18,278
2001 modern 187 #18,708
2002 modern 199 #18,350
2003 modern 188 #18,810
2004 modern 185 #19,114
2005 modern 179 #19,467
2006 modern 170 #20,214
2007 modern 179 #19,811
2008 modern 180 #19,946
2009 modern 182 #20,201
2010 modern 179 #20,886
2011 modern 179 #20,732
2012 modern 178 #20,758
2013 modern 184 #20,643
2014 modern 189 #20,441
2015 modern 189 #20,345
2016 modern 188 #20,417

Geography

Back to top

Where Losebys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, Manchester, Nottingham St Mary, Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars and Thrussington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Halton, Leeds, Leicester and Luton. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard Nottinghamshire
2 Manchester Lancashire
3 Nottingham St Mary Nottinghamshire
4 Leicester St Margaret and Bishop's Fee, Leicester All Saints, Blackfriars Leicestershire
5 Thrussington Leicestershire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Halton 001 Halton
2 Leeds 046 Leeds
3 Leeds 098 Leeds
4 Leicester 013 Leicester
5 Luton 009 Luton

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Loseby

These lists show first names that appear often with the Loseby surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Loseby

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Loseby, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Established Mature Families

Nationally, the Loseby surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established Mature Families, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Loseby household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Married couples predominate, many with older dependent children. Detached housing is common. Homeownership rates are the highest within this Supergroup. The presence of some students suggests that households are towards the end of a child rearing phase. Many residents have degree level qualifications, and the occupational profile is heavily skewed towards managerial and professional occupations. Residential developments commonly occur on the periphery of major urban cities or conurbations.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles

Group

Established Homeowners with Children

Within London, Loseby is most associated with areas classed as Established Homeowners with Children, part of Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly British-born residents are typically married/in civil partnerships and own the properties in which they are raising their children. Parents are typically over 45, and many other residents are beyond normal retirement age. Detached and semi-detached houses predominate and multiple car ownership is common.

Wider London pattern

These neighbourhoods house people of all ages, predominantly of White British or European extraction. Resident turnover is low. Religious affiliation is less common than average and tends to be Christian if expressed. Homeownership, typically of terraced houses, is common but use of the social rented sector is not. Employment is typically in professional, managerial and associate professional or technical occupations. There are few full-time students. Level 4 qualifications are common. More households lack dependent children than have them which, considered alongside low levels of crowding and over-all age structure, indicates that many households may be post child-rearing and in late middle age. Incidence of disability is low, as is residence in communal establishments.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Loseby is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Loseby falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Loseby is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Loseby, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Loseby families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Loseby surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Leicestershire leads with 64 Losebys recorded in 1881 and an index of 47.35x.

County Total Index
Leicestershire 64 47.35x
Lancashire 15 1.04x
Warwickshire 12 3.90x
Nottinghamshire 11 6.69x
Essex 8 3.32x
Staffordshire 7 1.70x
Middlesex 4 0.33x
Yorkshire 2 0.17x
Cambridgeshire 1 1.30x
Lincolnshire 1 0.51x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Thrussington in Leicestershire leads with 13 Losebys recorded in 1881 and an index of 5200.00x.

Place Total Index
Thrussington 13 5200.00x
Leicester St Margaret 10 30.34x
Hulme 9 29.80x
Leicester St Mary 8 73.26x
Ulverscroft 8 20000.00x
West Ham 8 15.06x
Stoke Upon Trent 7 16.04x
Coventry St Michael 6 60.73x
Stretford 6 75.38x
Warwick St Mary 6 224.72x
Wymeswold 5 1282.05x
Knighton 4 526.32x
Rearsby 4 2000.00x
Stanford On Soar 4 10000.00x
Walton On The Wolds 4 4444.44x
Billesdon 3 857.14x
Radford 3 35.93x
Burton On The Wolds 2 1333.33x
Kensington London 2 2.95x
Nottingham St Mary 2 4.71x
Ratby 2 294.12x
Whitechapel London 2 16.64x
Basford 1 13.21x
Bilton Cum Harrogate 1 24.21x
East Retford 1 69.93x
Kirkby Underwood 1 1111.11x
Leicester St Leonard 1 78.13x
Lythe 1 208.33x
Trumpington 1 256.41x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Loseby surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 11
Sarah 7
Alice 5
Ann 5
Elizabeth 4
Annie 2
Eliza 2
Emma 2
Jane 2
Beatrice 1
Charlotte 1
Clara 1
Constance 1
Edith 1
Elizth. 1
Ellen 1
Ellizebeth 1
Ethel 1
Fanny 1
Florence 1
Hannah 1
Harriet 1
Ida 1
Kate 1
Katurah 1
Margaret 1
Priscilla 1
Rhoda 1
Rose 1
Susannah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Loseby surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 9
William 8
Joseph 6
Thomas 6
Henry 5
George 3
Arthur 2
Harry 2
Richard 2
Robert 2
Anne 1
Benjamin 1
Charles 1
David 1
Enoch 1
Frederick 1
G.C. 1
Harrold 1
James 1
Leonard 1
Octavius 1
Percy 1
Samuel 1
T.W. 1
Tate 1
Tom 1
W.G. 1
Wm.Henry 1
Wm.Hy. 1

FAQ

Loseby surname: questions and answers

How common was the Loseby surname in 1881?

In 1881, 125 people were recorded with the Loseby surname. That placed it at #17,335 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Loseby surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 188 in 2016. That gives Loseby a modern rank of #20,417.

What does the Loseby map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Loseby bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.