NameCensus.

UK surname

Macham

In the 1881 census there were 73 people recorded with the Macham surname, ranking it #23,220 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 45, ranked #35,162, down from #23,220 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Northfield, East Retford and Toxteth Park. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Macham is 142 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 38.4%.

1881 census count

73

Ranked #23,220

Modern count

45

2016, ranked #35,162

Peak year

1891

142 bearers

Map years

4

1861 to 1911

Key insights

  • Macham had 73 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,220 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 45 in 2016, ranked #35,162.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 142 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Macham surname distribution map

The map shows where the Macham surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Macham surname density by area, 1911 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Macham over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 62 #22,232
1861 historical 130 #17,164
1881 historical 73 #23,220
1891 historical 142 #18,995
1901 historical 100 #22,863
1911 historical 108 #21,736
1997 modern 61 #31,526
1998 modern 76 #30,386
1999 modern 73 #30,856
2000 modern 75 #30,668
2001 modern 69 #31,098
2002 modern 75 #30,950
2003 modern 66 #31,879
2004 modern 61 #32,581
2005 modern 58 #33,094
2006 modern 60 #33,235
2007 modern 60 #33,539
2008 modern 58 #33,918
2009 modern 51 #34,612
2010 modern 49 #34,886
2011 modern 52 #34,688
2012 modern 50 #34,814
2013 modern 47 #35,071
2014 modern 45 #35,201
2015 modern 43 #35,269
2016 modern 45 #35,162

Geography

Back to top

Where Machams are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Northfield, East Retford, Toxteth Park, Shiffnal and Stoke-on-Trent, Bucknell-cum-Bagnall, Caverswall. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Northfield Worcestershire
2 East Retford Nottinghamshire
3 Toxteth Park Lancashire
4 Shiffnal Shropshire
5 Stoke-on-Trent, Bucknell-cum-Bagnall, Caverswall Staffordshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Macham

These lists show first names that appear often with the Macham surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Macham

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Macham, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Macham surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Macham household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Macham is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Macham is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Macham, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Macham families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Macham surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Shropshire leads with 12 Machams recorded in 1881 and an index of 19.51x.

County Total Index
Shropshire 12 19.51x
Yorkshire 11 1.56x
Lincolnshire 10 8.79x
Nottinghamshire 7 7.29x
Hampshire 6 4.11x
Staffordshire 5 2.08x
Warwickshire 5 2.78x
Glamorgan 4 3.23x
Lancashire 4 0.47x
Middlesex 4 0.56x
Gloucestershire 2 1.43x
Cheshire 1 0.64x
Herefordshire 1 3.43x
Suffolk 1 1.15x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Shifnal in Shropshire leads with 12 Machams recorded in 1881 and an index of 718.56x.

Place Total Index
Shifnal 12 718.56x
Billingborough 10 3448.28x
East Retford 7 843.37x
Wentworth 6 1363.64x
St Mary Extra 5 427.35x
Birmingham 4 6.68x
Merthyr Tydfil 4 33.59x
Toxteth Park 4 13.98x
Wolstanton Knutton 4 272.11x
St Botolph Bishopsgate 3 297.03x
Cirencester 2 105.82x
Ormesby 2 105.26x
Edgbaston 1 17.95x
Huddersfield 1 9.73x
Leeds 1 2.51x
Leominster 1 82.64x
Little Leigh 1 909.09x
Lowestoft 1 24.39x
Portsea 1 3.50x
Sheffield 1 4.45x
St Marylebone London 1 2.63x
Wolverhampton 1 5.41x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Macham surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Emma 5
Elizabeth 4
Ann 3
Sarah 3
Fanny 2
Jane 2
Ada 1
Agnes 1
Annie 1
Clara 1
Elenor 1
Eliza 1
Elizebeth 1
Emmeline 1
Florence 1
Florie 1
Helena 1
Julia 1
Margt. 1
Maria 1
Mary 1
May 1
Rose 1
Susie 1
Winifred 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Macham surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 8
William 6
Frederick 2
George 2
Henry 2
Joseph 2
Richard 2
Thomas 2
Alfred 1
Charles 1
Francis 1
Harry 1
Hezekiah 1
Johon 1
Patrick 1
Robert 1
W. 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Macham households.

FAQ

Macham surname: questions and answers

How common was the Macham surname in 1881?

In 1881, 73 people were recorded with the Macham surname. That placed it at #23,220 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Macham surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 45 in 2016. That gives Macham a modern rank of #35,162.

What does the Macham map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Macham bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.