NameCensus.

UK surname

Marrington

In the 1881 census there were 116 people recorded with the Marrington surname, ranking it #18,126 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 92, ranked #32,035, down from #18,126 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Beaumont with Moze and Gateshead. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Leeds, Harlow and Rossendale.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Marrington is 177 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 20.7%.

1881 census count

116

Ranked #18,126

Modern count

92

2016, ranked #32,035

Peak year

1861

177 bearers

Map years

7

1851 to 1998

Key insights

  • Marrington had 116 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #18,126 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 92 in 2016, ranked #32,035.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 177 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Outer Suburbs.

Marrington surname distribution map

The map shows where the Marrington surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Marrington surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Marrington over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 104 #16,746
1861 historical 177 #13,265
1881 historical 116 #18,126
1891 historical 171 #16,733
1901 historical 156 #17,638
1911 historical 161 #17,072
1997 modern 113 #25,106
1998 modern 116 #25,332
1999 modern 119 #25,095
2000 modern 117 #25,324
2001 modern 108 #26,184
2002 modern 103 #27,443
2003 modern 94 #28,686
2004 modern 100 #27,964
2005 modern 92 #29,271
2006 modern 90 #29,893
2007 modern 88 #30,515
2008 modern 86 #31,114
2009 modern 95 #30,393
2010 modern 105 #29,453
2011 modern 99 #30,218
2012 modern 94 #31,258
2013 modern 95 #31,523
2014 modern 94 #31,909
2015 modern 95 #31,749
2016 modern 92 #32,035

Geography

Back to top

Where Marringtons are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Beaumont with Moze, Gateshead and Whittlesey St Mary and St Andrew, Standground (Stilton & Peterborough, Northamptonshire). These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Leeds, Harlow, Rossendale and Northumberland. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Beaumont with Moze Essex
3 London parishes London 3
4 Gateshead Durham
5 Whittlesey St Mary and St Andrew, Standground (Stilton & Peterborough, Northamptonshire) Cambridgeshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Leeds 042 Leeds
2 Harlow 007 Harlow
3 Harlow 006 Harlow
4 Rossendale 002 Rossendale
5 Northumberland 035 Northumberland

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Marrington

These lists show first names that appear often with the Marrington surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Marrington

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Marrington, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Ethnically Diverse Suburban Professionals

Group

Outer Suburbs

Nationally, the Marrington surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Outer Suburbs, within Ethnically Diverse Suburban Professionals. This does not mean every Marrington household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods are found on the outer edges of many towns and cities. Many residents were born outside the UK. Indian ethnic group representation is high. There are high numbers of families with dependent children aged 5 to 14. Incidences of disability and of provision of unpaid care are low. Neighbourhoods provide a mix of detached housing and flats, and terraced housing is not uncommon. Levels of overcrowding are low and homeownership rates are high. Professional and managerial occupations are prevalent: unemployment is low and education to degree level is the norm.

Wider pattern

Those working within the managerial, professional and administrative occupations typically reflect a wide range of ethnic groups, and reside in detached or semi-detached housing. Their residential locations at the edges of cities and conurbations and car-based lifestyles are more characteristic of Supergroup membership than birthplace or participation in child-rearing. Houses are typically owner-occupied and marriage rates are lower than the national average. This Supergroup is found throughout suburban UK.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Marrington is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Marrington is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Marrington falls in decile 5 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

5
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Marrington is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Marrington, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Marrington families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Marrington surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Essex leads with 25 Marringtons recorded in 1881 and an index of 11.19x.

County Total Index
Essex 25 11.19x
Durham 21 6.24x
Middlesex 17 1.50x
Huntingdonshire 13 57.85x
Surrey 9 1.63x
Cambridgeshire 8 11.16x
Northamptonshire 6 5.64x
Hampshire 5 2.16x
Kent 5 1.30x
Norfolk 5 2.87x
Derbyshire 1 0.56x
Lincolnshire 1 0.55x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Beaumont in Essex leads with 16 Marringtons recorded in 1881 and an index of 9411.76x.

Place Total Index
Beaumont 16 9411.76x
Great Raveley 8 10000.00x
Kensington London 8 12.72x
Bishopwearmouth 7 24.23x
Whittlesey St Mary St 7 280.00x
Earls Barton 6 659.34x
Battersea 5 12.01x
Ingoldisthorpe 5 4166.67x
Lewisham 5 24.28x
Frimley 4 254.78x
Hedworth Monkton Jarrow 4 27.43x
Shoreditch London 4 8.15x
St Ives 4 344.83x
Stranton 4 35.30x
Sunderland 4 67.34x
Great Clacton 3 394.74x
Portsea 3 6.60x
Bethnal Green London 2 4.07x
Colchester St James 2 219.78x
Coundon 2 147.06x
Kirby Le Soken 2 625.00x
Bassingbourn 1 95.24x
Buxton 1 66.67x
Frating 1 1000.00x
Great Grimsby 1 8.71x
Hackney London 1 1.58x
Hampstead London 1 5.68x
Islington London 1 0.91x
Portsmouth 1 18.73x
Southampton St Mary 1 6.86x
St Neots 1 81.97x
Thorpe 1 416.67x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Marrington surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Eliza 5
Elizabeth 5
Mary 5
Sarah 5
Martha 4
Emma 3
Alice 2
Ann 2
Charlotte 2
Eleanor 2
Eve 2
Florence 2
Agnes 1
Barbra 1
Beatrice 1
Betsey 1
Catherine 1
Cathlean 1
Edith 1
Elizth. 1
Ellen 1
Francis 1
Hannah 1
Harriett 1
Hester 1
Jane 1
Joanna 1
John 1
Kate 1
Lizzie 1
Louisa 1
Maoni. 1
Margaret 1
Maud 1
Maude 1
Nellie 1
Ruth 1
Sophia 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Marrington surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 7
William 6
George 5
Charles 4
Frederick 3
Albert 2
David 2
Henry 2
Joseph 2
Matthew 2
Robert 2
Thomas 2
Thos. 2
Barford 1
Frederic 1
James 1
Morris 1
Theodore 1
Walter 1
Willie 1

FAQ

Marrington surname: questions and answers

How common was the Marrington surname in 1881?

In 1881, 116 people were recorded with the Marrington surname. That placed it at #18,126 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Marrington surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 92 in 2016. That gives Marrington a modern rank of #32,035.

What does the Marrington map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Marrington bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.