NameCensus.

UK surname

Mcgeachie

In the 1881 census there were 174 people recorded with the Mcgeachie surname, ranking it #14,042 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 509, ranked #9,860, up from #14,042 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Blantyre, Govan Combination and Greenock. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Irvine Castlepark North, Irvine East and Birmingham.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Mcgeachie is 525 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 192.5%.

1881 census count

174

Ranked #14,042

Modern count

509

2016, ranked #9,860

Peak year

2010

525 bearers

Map years

7

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Mcgeachie had 174 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,042 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 509 in 2016, ranked #9,860.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 282 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Mcgeachie surname distribution map

The map shows where the Mcgeachie surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Mcgeachie surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Mcgeachie over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 38 #26,502
1861 historical 120 #18,255
1881 historical 174 #14,042
1891 historical 211 #14,366
1901 historical 282 #12,145
1911 historical 11 #32,463
1997 modern 451 #10,049
1998 modern 478 #9,940
1999 modern 495 #9,731
2000 modern 472 #10,063
2001 modern 465 #9,993
2002 modern 462 #10,217
2003 modern 454 #10,222
2004 modern 463 #10,074
2005 modern 482 #9,685
2006 modern 480 #9,772
2007 modern 498 #9,592
2008 modern 511 #9,485
2009 modern 522 #9,544
2010 modern 525 #9,692
2011 modern 507 #9,854
2012 modern 484 #10,106
2013 modern 496 #10,080
2014 modern 502 #10,050
2015 modern 501 #9,995
2016 modern 509 #9,860

Geography

Back to top

Where Mcgeachies are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Blantyre, Govan Combination, Greenock, Glasgow and Paisley Abbey. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Irvine Castlepark North, Irvine East, Birmingham, Kilwinning Central and North and Craigshill. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Blantyre Lanark
2 Govan Combination Lanark
3 Greenock Renfrew
4 Glasgow Lanark
5 Paisley Abbey Renfrew

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Irvine Castlepark North North Ayrshire
2 Irvine East North Ayrshire
3 Birmingham 089 Birmingham
4 Kilwinning Central and North North Ayrshire
5 Craigshill West Lothian

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Mcgeachie

These lists show first names that appear often with the Mcgeachie surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Mcgeachie

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Mcgeachie, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Mcgeachie surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Mcgeachie household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Mcgeachie is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Mcgeachie is most concentrated in decile 2 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

2
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Mcgeachie falls in decile 2 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

2
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Mcgeachie is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Mcgeachie, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

FAQ

Mcgeachie surname: questions and answers

How common was the Mcgeachie surname in 1881?

In 1881, 174 people were recorded with the Mcgeachie surname. That placed it at #14,042 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Mcgeachie surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 509 in 2016. That gives Mcgeachie a modern rank of #9,860.

What does the Mcgeachie map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Mcgeachie bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.