NameCensus.

UK surname

Print

In the 1881 census there were 182 people recorded with the Print surname, ranking it #13,647 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 310, ranked #14,406, down from #13,647 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Yardley, Tredington and Kings Norton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Stratford-on-Avon, Wychavon and Rugby.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Print is 347 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 70.3%.

1881 census count

182

Ranked #13,647

Modern count

310

2016, ranked #14,406

Peak year

1998

347 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Print had 182 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,647 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 310 in 2016, ranked #14,406.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 274 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Print surname distribution map

The map shows where the Print surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Print surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Print over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 118 #15,362
1861 historical 146 #15,628
1881 historical 182 #13,647
1891 historical 248 #12,849
1901 historical 232 #13,769
1911 historical 274 #12,150
1997 modern 324 #12,859
1998 modern 347 #12,607
1999 modern 340 #12,870
2000 modern 340 #12,824
2001 modern 339 #12,641
2002 modern 335 #13,020
2003 modern 319 #13,263
2004 modern 316 #13,425
2005 modern 287 #14,216
2006 modern 280 #14,535
2007 modern 280 #14,694
2008 modern 287 #14,580
2009 modern 291 #14,742
2010 modern 288 #15,162
2011 modern 297 #14,698
2012 modern 311 #14,173
2013 modern 312 #14,332
2014 modern 310 #14,499
2015 modern 312 #14,347
2016 modern 310 #14,406

Geography

Back to top

Where Prints are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Yardley, Tredington, Kings Norton, London parishes and Bloxham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Stratford-on-Avon, Wychavon, Rugby and Daventry. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Yardley Warwickshire
2 Tredington Warwickshire
3 Kings Norton Worcestershire
4 London parishes London 3
5 Bloxham Oxfordshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Stratford-on-Avon 015 Stratford-on-Avon
2 Wychavon 017 Wychavon
3 Rugby 001 Rugby
4 Wychavon 016 Wychavon
5 Daventry 007 Daventry

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Print

These lists show first names that appear often with the Print surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Print

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Print, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Print surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Print household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Print is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Print is most concentrated in decile 1 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

1
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Print falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Print is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Print, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Print families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Print surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Warwickshire leads with 99 Prints recorded in 1881 and an index of 22.11x.

County Total Index
Warwickshire 99 22.11x
Gloucestershire 17 4.88x
Worcestershire 14 6.04x
Oxfordshire 11 10.03x
Staffordshire 11 1.84x
Durham 6 1.14x
Middlesex 6 0.34x
Buckinghamshire 5 4.66x
Suffolk 4 1.85x
Derbyshire 2 0.72x
Lancashire 2 0.09x
Surrey 2 0.23x
Essex 1 0.29x
Kent 1 0.17x
Yorkshire 1 0.06x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Birmingham in Warwickshire leads with 31 Prints recorded in 1881 and an index of 20.78x.

Place Total Index
Birmingham 31 20.78x
Aston 25 20.28x
Bloxham 11 1018.52x
Childs Wyckham 8 2962.96x
Kings Norton 8 38.48x
Baddesley Clinton 7 8750.00x
Budbrooke 7 1521.74x
Charlton Kings 7 290.46x
Tipton 7 38.15x
Barford 6 1363.64x
Witton Le Wear 6 400.00x
Alcester 5 337.84x
Coleshill 5 347.22x
Tredington 5 793.65x
Brailes 4 579.71x
Buckingham 4 183.49x
Levington 4 4000.00x
Leamington Priors 3 27.22x
Mile End Old Town 3 10.71x
Wednesbury 3 20.03x
Butlers Marston 2 1250.00x
Clapham 2 9.01x
Kensington London 2 2.03x
Spotland 2 8.54x
Cheltenham 1 3.72x
Edgbaston 1 7.20x
Findern 1 400.00x
Gloucester Kingsholm St 1 76.92x
Greenwich 1 3.54x
Holy Trinity 1 2.36x
Moreton Morrell 1 625.00x
Norton 1 400.00x
Old Stratford 1 39.53x
St Marylebone London 1 1.06x
Steeple Claydon 1 192.31x
Thundersley 1 312.50x
Warwick St Mary 1 25.71x
West Bromwich 1 2.91x
Willington 1 322.58x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Print surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 8
Hannah 8
Sarah 8
Alice 6
Ellen 5
Mary 5
Ann 3
Annie 2
Clara 2
Emily 2
Emma 2
Fanny 2
Flora 2
Helen 2
Jane 2
Jessie 2
Julia 2
Rebecca 2
Ada 1
Anna 1
Anne 1
Betsy 1
Edith 1
Eliza 1
Georgina 1
Grace 1
Hannibel 1
Harriet 1
Harriett 1
Kate 1
Laura 1
Lavinia 1
Louisa 1
Mabel 1
Margaret 1
Margt. 1
Maria 1
Martha 1
Maryann 1
Matilda 1
Mildred 1
Phebe 1
Phoebe 1
Rosanna 1
Rose 1
Rosehannah 1
Selina 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Print surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 11
Thomas 11
William 9
Albert 7
George 5
Arthur 4
James 4
Alfred 3
Frederick 3
Henry 3
Joseph 3
Alban 2
Andrew 2
David 2
Richard 2
Samuel 2
Stephen 2
Walter 2
Ben 1
Edward 1
Frank 1
Harry 1
Isiah 1
Jessie 1
Job 1
Kendrick 1
Proctor 1
Robert 1
Vincent 1

FAQ

Print surname: questions and answers

How common was the Print surname in 1881?

In 1881, 182 people were recorded with the Print surname. That placed it at #13,647 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Print surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 310 in 2016. That gives Print a modern rank of #14,406.

What does the Print map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Print bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.