NameCensus.

UK surname

Rushmer

In the 1881 census there were 206 people recorded with the Rushmer surname, ranking it #12,596 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 345, ranked #13,321, down from #12,596 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Beccles and Reedham. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Broadland, South Norfolk and Milton Keynes.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Rushmer is 374 in 2000. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 67.5%.

1881 census count

206

Ranked #12,596

Modern count

345

2016, ranked #13,321

Peak year

2000

374 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Rushmer had 206 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #12,596 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 345 in 2016, ranked #13,321.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 300 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Rushmer surname distribution map

The map shows where the Rushmer surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Rushmer surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Rushmer over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 164 #12,116
1861 historical 104 #20,477
1881 historical 206 #12,596
1891 historical 236 #13,278
1901 historical 300 #11,647
1911 historical 300 #11,441
1997 modern 357 #11,998
1998 modern 366 #12,148
1999 modern 365 #12,245
2000 modern 374 #11,976
2001 modern 367 #11,968
2002 modern 365 #12,246
2003 modern 359 #12,189
2004 modern 350 #12,449
2005 modern 356 #12,219
2006 modern 342 #12,652
2007 modern 345 #12,714
2008 modern 346 #12,813
2009 modern 345 #13,107
2010 modern 341 #13,477
2011 modern 340 #13,375
2012 modern 337 #13,345
2013 modern 352 #13,130
2014 modern 350 #13,263
2015 modern 348 #13,221
2016 modern 345 #13,321

Geography

Back to top

Where Rushmers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Beccles, Reedham, Thurlton and Lakenham , Eaton St Andrew, Town Close, St Stephen, St Peter Mancroft, St Giles, St Andrew, St John. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Broadland, South Norfolk, Milton Keynes, Norwich and Waveney. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Beccles Suffolk
3 Reedham Norfolk
4 Thurlton Norfolk
5 Lakenham , Eaton St Andrew, Town Close, St Stephen, St Peter Mancroft, St Giles, St Andrew, St John Norfolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Broadland 001 Broadland
2 South Norfolk 010 South Norfolk
3 Milton Keynes 006 Milton Keynes
4 Norwich 002 Norwich
5 Waveney 002 Waveney

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Rushmer

These lists show first names that appear often with the Rushmer surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Rushmer

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Rushmer, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Rushmer surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Rushmer household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Rushmer is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Rushmer is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Rushmer falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Rushmer is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Rushmer, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Rushmer families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Rushmer surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 112 Rushmers recorded in 1881 and an index of 36.25x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 112 36.25x
Suffolk 47 19.20x
Middlesex 26 1.29x
Durham 7 1.17x
Kent 5 0.73x
Surrey 5 0.51x
Glamorgan 2 0.57x
Hampshire 1 0.24x
Nottinghamshire 1 0.37x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Reedham in Norfolk leads with 22 Rushmers recorded in 1881 and an index of 3728.81x.

Place Total Index
Reedham 22 3728.81x
Great Yarmouth 17 66.43x
Beccles 16 406.09x
Pakefield 16 2622.95x
Acle 11 1746.03x
Wickhampton 10 10000.00x
Kensington London 9 8.06x
Thurlton 9 3103.45x
Norwich St Stephen 8 281.69x
Bethnal Green London 6 6.87x
Heigham 6 36.19x
Thorpe Next Haddiscoe 6 10000.00x
Walsoken 6 322.58x
Holy Trinity Less 5 1162.79x
Lowestoft 5 43.25x
Bermondsey 4 6.69x
Bungay Holy Trinity 4 317.46x
Corton 4 1025.64x
Norwich St Peter 4 197.04x
Swanscombe 4 129.87x
Brooke 2 408.16x
Darlington 2 8.67x
Norwich St George Colegate 2 178.57x
Norwich St John Sepulchre 2 100.00x
South Shields 2 37.59x
St Pancras London 2 1.24x
Stoke Newington London 2 12.78x
Stranton 2 9.94x
Ystradyfodwg 2 6.52x
Burgh 1 666.67x
Eaton St Andrew 1 116.28x
Gorleston 1 16.08x
Haddiscoe 1 370.37x
Ipswich St Margaret 1 12.05x
Islington London 1 0.51x
Maidstone 1 4.90x
Norwich St Martin At 1 192.31x
Norwich St Peter Mancroft 1 64.52x
Nottingham St Mary 1 1.43x
Richmond 1 7.29x
South Stoneham 1 11.20x
Southwood 1 3333.33x
Stockton On Tees 1 3.47x
Topcroft 1 400.00x
Westminster St 1 13.50x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Rushmer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 11
Alice 7
Sarah 7
Eliza 5
Emma 5
Hannah 5
Emily 4
Harriet 4
Ann 3
Anne 3
Elizabeth 3
Ellen 3
Jane 3
Martha 3
Ada 2
Annie 2
Edith 2
Margaret 2
Maud 2
Agnes 1
Allice 1
Amelia 1
Anna 1
Bertha 1
Charlotte 1
Clara 1
Eleanor 1
Elizh. 1
Ethel 1
Fanny 1
Florence 1
Georgina 1
Gytha 1
Isabella 1
Julia 1
Kate 1
Laura 1
Lily 1
Lucy 1
Maria 1
Marianne 1
Marion 1
Matilda 1
Minnie 1
Nellie 1
Rebecca 1
Rosa 1
Rosanna 1
Rosina 1
Sophia 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Rushmer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 16
Henry 9
John 8
Robert 8
Charles 7
James 7
Arthur 6
George 5
Albert 3
Frederick 3
Herbert 3
Alonzo 2
Edgar 2
Ernest 2
Samuel 2
Alfred 1
Chas. 1
Cheriachi 1
Edward 1
Fredk.F. 1
Fredk.Tho. 1
Fredrick 1
Geo. 1
Harry 1
Joshua 1
Richard 1
Robt. 1
Thomas 1
Walter 1
Wil. 1

FAQ

Rushmer surname: questions and answers

How common was the Rushmer surname in 1881?

In 1881, 206 people were recorded with the Rushmer surname. That placed it at #12,596 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Rushmer surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 345 in 2016. That gives Rushmer a modern rank of #13,321.

What does the Rushmer map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Rushmer bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.