NameCensus.

UK surname

Slender

In the 1881 census there were 69 people recorded with the Slender surname, ranking it #23,816 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 125, ranked #26,827, down from #23,816 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to No data. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Central Bedfordshire and Cheltenham.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Slender is 134 in 2014. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 81.2%.

1881 census count

69

Ranked #23,816

Modern count

125

2016, ranked #26,827

Peak year

2014

134 bearers

Map years

3

1998 to 2016

Key insights

  • Slender had 69 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,816 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 125 in 2016, ranked #26,827.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 77 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Slender surname distribution map

The map shows where the Slender surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Slender surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Slender over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 19 #29,904
1861 historical 24 #30,922
1881 historical 69 #23,816
1891 historical 52 #30,061
1901 historical 59 #27,609
1911 historical 77 #25,106
1997 modern 102 #26,638
1998 modern 103 #27,141
1999 modern 105 #27,035
2000 modern 101 #27,555
2001 modern 103 #26,927
2002 modern 112 #26,165
2003 modern 107 #26,617
2004 modern 113 #25,999
2005 modern 108 #26,736
2006 modern 113 #26,267
2007 modern 123 #25,208
2008 modern 123 #25,505
2009 modern 125 #25,823
2010 modern 131 #25,656
2011 modern 127 #25,926
2012 modern 130 #25,559
2013 modern 130 #26,074
2014 modern 134 #25,711
2015 modern 127 #26,494
2016 modern 125 #26,827

Geography

Back to top

Where Slenders are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around No data. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Central Bedfordshire and Cheltenham. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 No data No data

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Central Bedfordshire 005 Central Bedfordshire
2 Cheltenham 005 Cheltenham
3 Cheltenham 004 Cheltenham
4 Central Bedfordshire 006 Central Bedfordshire
5 Cheltenham 001 Cheltenham

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Slender

These lists show first names that appear often with the Slender surname in historical and recent records.

Historical female names

No Forenames Found

Historical male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Slender

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Slender, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Slender surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Slender household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Slender is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Slender is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Slender falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Slender is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Slender, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Slender families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Slender surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Kent leads with 37 Slenders recorded in 1881 and an index of 16.11x.

County Total Index
Kent 37 16.11x
Norfolk 10 9.66x
Glamorgan 7 5.97x
Inverness-shire 6 29.85x
Surrey 5 1.52x
Dumfriesshire 1 6.72x
Huntingdonshire 1 7.49x
Leicestershire 1 1.34x
Shropshire 1 1.72x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bearsted in Kent leads with 10 Slenders recorded in 1881 and an index of 7142.86x.

Place Total Index
Bearsted 10 7142.86x
Thetford St Mary 8 2857.14x
Eglwysilan 7 344.83x
Halling 7 2333.33x
Thornham 7 4666.67x
Inverness 6 118.58x
Maidstone 6 87.72x
Boxley 3 857.14x
Borden 2 689.66x
Epsom 2 125.00x
Thorpe Next Norwich 2 181.82x
Battersea 1 4.04x
Clapham 1 11.89x
Lambeth 1 1.70x
Leicester All Sts 1 68.03x
Morton 1 204.08x
Newport 1 142.86x
Sittingbourne 1 55.25x
Snodland 1 153.85x
St Ives 1 144.93x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Slender surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 4
Eliza 3
Ada 2
Emily 2
Agness 1
Alice 1
Amy 1
Ann 1
Antonie 1
Bertha 1
Bethany 1
Blanche 1
Celinda 1
Edith 1
Elizabeth 1
Ellen 1
Emma 1
Fanny 1
Francis 1
Georgina 1
Harriet 1
Jane 1
Julia 1
Louisa 1
M.Elizth. 1
Minnie 1
Norah 1
Sarah 1
Susan 1
Winnifred 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Slender surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 6
James 4
Henry 2
Thomas 2
Alfred 1
Charles 1
Edward 1
Edwin 1
Frank 1
George 1
Hake 1
John 1
Louis 1
Rigteous 1
Walter 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Slender households.

FAQ

Slender surname: questions and answers

How common was the Slender surname in 1881?

In 1881, 69 people were recorded with the Slender surname. That placed it at #23,816 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Slender surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 125 in 2016. That gives Slender a modern rank of #26,827.

What does the Slender map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Slender bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.