NameCensus.

UK surname

Somas

In the 1881 census there were 3 people recorded with the Somas surname, ranking it #33,498 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 6, ranked #38,110, down from #33,498 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Prestbury, Radcliffe and Glossop. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Somas is 169 in 1851. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 100.0%.

1881 census count

3

Ranked #33,498

Modern count

6

2016, ranked #38,110

Peak year

1851

169 bearers

Map years

1

1851 to 1851

Key insights

  • Somas had 3 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #33,498 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 6 in 2016, ranked #38,110.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 169 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Somas surname distribution map

The map shows where the Somas surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Somas surname density by area, 1851 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Somas over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 169 #11,832
1861 historical 10 #32,589
1881 historical 3 #33,498
1891 historical 19 #32,642
1901 historical 8 #33,289
1911 historical 46 #28,224
1997 modern 1 #38,839
1998 modern 1 #38,814
2000 modern 1 #38,790
2001 modern 2 #38,335
2002 modern 1 #38,709
2003 modern 2 #38,424
2004 modern 4 #38,013
2005 modern 5 #37,885
2006 modern 7 #37,634
2007 modern 6 #37,837
2008 modern 6 #37,883
2009 modern 3 #38,494
2010 modern 2 #38,775
2011 modern 1 #39,015
2014 modern 1 #39,020
2015 modern 1 #39,021
2016 modern 6 #38,110

Geography

Back to top

Where Somas' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Prestbury, Radcliffe, Glossop, Brampton and Burford. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Prestbury Cheshire
2 Radcliffe Lancashire
3 Glossop Derbyshire
4 Brampton Derbyshire
5 Burford Oxfordshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Somas

These lists show first names that appear often with the Somas surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Somas

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Somas, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Somas surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Somas household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Somas is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Somas is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
Unknown

This describes the area pattern most associated with Somas, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Somas families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Somas surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lanarkshire leads with 3 Somas' recorded in 1881 and an index of 31.75x.

County Total Index
Lanarkshire 3 31.75x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Hamilton in Lanarkshire leads with 3 Somas' recorded in 1881 and an index of 1153.85x.

Place Total Index
Hamilton 3 1153.85x

FAQ

Somas surname: questions and answers

How common was the Somas surname in 1881?

In 1881, 3 people were recorded with the Somas surname. That placed it at #33,498 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Somas surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 6 in 2016. That gives Somas a modern rank of #38,110.

What does the Somas map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Somas bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.