NameCensus.

UK surname

Strangeway

In the 1881 census there were 130 people recorded with the Strangeway surname, ranking it #16,911 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 278, ranked #15,579, up from #16,911 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Burythorp, St Werburgh and Normanton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Ryedale, East Riding of Yorkshire and Leeds.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Strangeway is 303 in 2004. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 113.8%.

1881 census count

130

Ranked #16,911

Modern count

278

2016, ranked #15,579

Peak year

2004

303 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Strangeway had 130 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #16,911 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 278 in 2016, ranked #15,579.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 234 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Strangeway surname distribution map

The map shows where the Strangeway surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Strangeway surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Strangeway over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 76 #20,127
1861 historical 103 #20,650
1881 historical 130 #16,911
1891 historical 194 #15,277
1901 historical 195 #15,380
1911 historical 234 #13,526
1997 modern 276 #14,290
1998 modern 291 #14,155
1999 modern 295 #14,108
2000 modern 288 #14,312
2001 modern 283 #14,247
2002 modern 293 #14,203
2003 modern 301 #13,785
2004 modern 303 #13,812
2005 modern 279 #14,480
2006 modern 289 #14,234
2007 modern 286 #14,496
2008 modern 293 #14,364
2009 modern 290 #14,778
2010 modern 289 #15,127
2011 modern 291 #14,903
2012 modern 285 #15,050
2013 modern 280 #15,530
2014 modern 287 #15,342
2015 modern 277 #15,622
2016 modern 278 #15,579

Geography

Back to top

Where Strangeways are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Burythorp, St Werburgh, Normanton, St Michael-le-Belfry, St Giles and St Helen on the Wall, St Cuthbert, All Saints Peasholm, St Saviour. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Ryedale, East Riding of Yorkshire, Leeds and Selby. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Burythorp Yorkshire, North Riding
2 St Werburgh Derbyshire
3 Normanton Yorkshire, West Riding
4 St Michael-le-Belfry, St Giles Yorkshire, East Riding
5 St Helen on the Wall, St Cuthbert, All Saints Peasholm, St Saviour Yorkshire, East Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Ryedale 008 Ryedale
2 East Riding of Yorkshire 015 East Riding of Yorkshire
3 Leeds 068 Leeds
4 Selby 001 Selby
5 East Riding of Yorkshire 011 East Riding of Yorkshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Strangeway

These lists show first names that appear often with the Strangeway surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Strangeway

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Strangeway, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Strangeway surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Strangeway household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Strangeway is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Strangeway is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Strangeway falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Strangeway is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Strangeway, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Strangeway families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Strangeway surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 78 Strangeways recorded in 1881 and an index of 6.21x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 78 6.21x
Derbyshire 14 7.05x
Lancashire 12 0.80x
Middlesex 7 0.55x
Perthshire 5 8.79x
Northumberland 4 2.12x
Durham 3 0.80x
Surrey 2 0.32x
Cheshire 1 0.36x
Devon 1 0.38x
Midlothian 1 0.59x
Nottinghamshire 1 0.59x
Staffordshire 1 0.23x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Burythorpe in Yorkshire leads with 12 Strangeways recorded in 1881 and an index of 10909.09x.

Place Total Index
Burythorpe 12 10909.09x
Leeds 12 16.91x
Barrow In Furness 11 53.76x
Bramley In Bramley 10 207.90x
Derby St Werburgh 10 87.26x
York All Sts Peasholme 8 4000.00x
Holbeck 6 72.12x
New Malton 6 400.00x
Normanton 6 158.73x
Ardoch 5 1041.67x
Market Weighton Arras 5 609.76x
St George Martyr 5 233.64x
Litchurch 4 50.06x
Ormesby 4 118.34x
Byker 3 32.15x
Batley 2 16.75x
Bermondsey 2 5.30x
Bilton Cum Harrogate 2 46.51x
Chelsea London 2 5.23x
Crambe 2 3333.33x
Westoe 2 9.35x
York St George 2 202.02x
Ardwick 1 7.37x
Berwick Upon Tweed 1 25.00x
Birkenhead 1 4.48x
Darlington 1 6.87x
Dawlish 1 50.76x
Edinburgh St Cuthberts 1 1.46x
Fazeley 1 128.21x
Linthorpe 1 13.33x
Nottingham St Nicholas 1 42.92x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Strangeway surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Strangeway surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 12
William 11
Thomas 9
James 6
George 4
Henry 4
Mathew 3
Harry 2
Joseph 2
Richard 2
Robert 2
Albert 1
Arthur 1
Edmond 1
Edward 1
Frederick 1
Jonathan 1
Mark 1
Robt.C. 1
Tom 1
Walter 1
Wm.S. 1

FAQ

Strangeway surname: questions and answers

How common was the Strangeway surname in 1881?

In 1881, 130 people were recorded with the Strangeway surname. That placed it at #16,911 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Strangeway surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 278 in 2016. That gives Strangeway a modern rank of #15,579.

What does the Strangeway map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Strangeway bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.