UK surname
In the 1881 census there were 4 people recorded with the Sunt surname, ranking it #33,288 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 5, ranked #38,264, down from #33,288 in 1881.
The strongest historical links point to Stockport (Romiley), No Mans Land, Wolstanton and St Leonard Shoreditch. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.
Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Sunt is 109 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 25.0%.
1881 census count
4
Ranked #33,288
Modern count
5
2016, ranked #38,264
Peak year
1861
109 bearers
Map years
1
1861 to 1861
Key insights
Map
Back to topThe map shows where the Sunt surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.
Distribution map
Sunt surname density by area, 1861 census.
Timeline
Back to topThe table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.
| Year | Period | Count | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | historical | 7 | #32,070 |
| 1861 | historical | 109 | #19,693 |
| 1881 | historical | 4 | #33,288 |
| 1891 | historical | 65 | #28,660 |
| 1901 | historical | 4 | #33,876 |
| 1911 | historical | 25 | #30,654 |
| 2002 | modern | 1 | #38,709 |
| 2004 | modern | 4 | #38,013 |
| 2005 | modern | 7 | #37,581 |
| 2006 | modern | 10 | #37,224 |
| 2007 | modern | 7 | #37,687 |
| 2008 | modern | 7 | #37,735 |
| 2009 | modern | 4 | #38,287 |
| 2010 | modern | 4 | #38,371 |
| 2011 | modern | 4 | #38,338 |
| 2012 | modern | 5 | #38,167 |
| 2013 | modern | 4 | #38,359 |
| 2014 | modern | 4 | #38,376 |
| 2015 | modern | 5 | #38,221 |
| 2016 | modern | 5 | #38,264 |
Geography
Back to topHistorical parish links are strongest around Stockport (Romiley), No Mans Land, Wolstanton, St Leonard Shoreditch, Childwall and Liverpool. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.
The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.
| Rank | Parish | Area |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stockport (Romiley), No Mans Land | Cheshire |
| 2 | Wolstanton | Staffordshire |
| 3 | St Leonard Shoreditch | London (East Districts) |
| 4 | Childwall | Lancashire |
| 5 | Liverpool | Lancashire |
| Rank | Area | District |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No data | No data |
Forenames
Back to topThese lists show first names that appear often with the Sunt surname in historical and recent records.
Recent female names
Recent male names
Modern profile
Back to topModern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Sunt, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.
These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.
The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.
UK neighbourhood type
Supergroup
No data
Group
No data
Nationally, the Sunt surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Sunt household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.
London neighbourhood type
Supergroup
No data
Group
No data
Within London, Sunt is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.
Broadband speed
The modern neighbourhood pattern for Sunt is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.
Area snapshot
This describes the area pattern most associated with Sunt, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.
1881 census detail
Back to topThese tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Sunt surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.
Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 2 Sunts recorded in 1881 and an index of 5.15x.
Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Shoreditch London in Middlesex leads with 2 Sunts recorded in 1881 and an index of 119.05x.
| Place | Total | Index |
|---|---|---|
| Shoreditch London | 2 | 119.05x |
| Sheffield | 1 | 81.30x |
| Sudbury St Gregory | 1 | 2500.00x |
These are the female first names most often recorded with the Sunt surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.
These are the male first names most often recorded with the Sunt surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.
| Name | Count |
|---|---|
| George | 1 |
Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Sunt households.
| Occupation | Count |
|---|---|
| Interest Of Money | 1 |
| Machinist | 1 |
| Steel Stripper | 1 |
| Tobacconist | 1 |
FAQ
In 1881, 4 people were recorded with the Sunt surname. That placed it at #33,288 in the surname rankings for that year.
The latest modern count shown here is 5 in 2016. That gives Sunt a modern rank of #38,264.
The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Sunt bearers relative to the surrounding population.
The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.