NameCensus.

UK surname

Taker

In the 1881 census there were 19 people recorded with the Taker surname, ranking it #30,872 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 98, ranked #31,470, down from #30,872 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Carlisle St Cuthbert, London parishes and Liverpool. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Cheshire East, Manchester and Brentwood.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Taker is 115 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 415.8%.

1881 census count

19

Ranked #30,872

Modern count

98

2016, ranked #31,470

Peak year

1891

115 bearers

Map years

1

1891 to 1891

Key insights

  • Taker had 19 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #30,872 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 98 in 2016, ranked #31,470.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 115 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Taker surname distribution map

The map shows where the Taker surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Taker surname density by area, 1891 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Taker over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 17 #30,267
1861 historical 96 #21,648
1881 historical 19 #30,872
1891 historical 115 #21,878
1901 historical 49 #28,696
1911 historical 38 #29,147
1997 modern 80 #29,554
1998 modern 76 #30,386
1999 modern 76 #30,546
2000 modern 81 #30,036
2001 modern 77 #30,277
2002 modern 75 #30,950
2003 modern 80 #30,425
2004 modern 75 #31,233
2005 modern 72 #31,730
2006 modern 75 #31,733
2007 modern 79 #31,628
2008 modern 76 #32,279
2009 modern 78 #32,471
2010 modern 79 #32,759
2011 modern 84 #32,237
2012 modern 87 #32,180
2013 modern 96 #31,381
2014 modern 97 #31,518
2015 modern 102 #30,624
2016 modern 98 #31,470

Geography

Back to top

Where Takers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Carlisle St Cuthbert, London parishes, Liverpool, St Martin Orgars and Warrington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Cheshire East, Manchester, Brentwood and Cheshire West and Chester. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Carlisle St Cuthbert Cumberland
2 London parishes London 3
3 Liverpool Lancashire
4 St Martin Orgars London (Central Districts)
5 Warrington Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Cheshire East 037 Cheshire East
2 Manchester 037 Manchester
3 Brentwood 009 Brentwood
4 Cheshire West and Chester 027 Cheshire West and Chester
5 Cheshire East 041 Cheshire East

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Taker

These lists show first names that appear often with the Taker surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Taker

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Taker, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Taker surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Taker household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Central Connected Professionals and Managers

Group

Senior Professionals

Within London, Taker is most associated with areas classed as Senior Professionals, part of Central Connected Professionals and Managers. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These very central neighbourhoods house residents whose ages are more skewed towards older age cohorts than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Few households have young children. Rates of illness are low. Indian ethnicity is rare compared to the Supergroup mean. Property under occupation is more common, despite the centrality of neighbourhoods, and more residents live in communal establishments than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Adult residents of these neighbourhoods are typically aged 25 to 44, working full-time in professional, managerial or associate professional occupations. There are few families with dependent children. The predominantly Inner London neighbourhoods have an international character, including many residents born elsewhere in Europe alongside high numbers of individuals identifying as of Chinese ethnicity. Many individuals are never married, childless and/or living alone. Above average numbers of individuals, likely to be full-time students, live in communal establishments. Elsewhere, privately rented flats are the dominant housing type. Residents of these areas are well-qualified, with a significant number holding Level 4 or above qualifications. There is a correspondingly high level of individuals employed full-time in professional, managerial and associated professional or technical occupations. Employing industries are financial, real estate, professional, administration, and, to a lesser degree, transport and communications. Unemployment is uncommon.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Taker is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Taker falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Taker is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Taker, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Taker families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Taker surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 8 Takers recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.64x.

County Total Index
Lancashire 8 3.64x
Buckinghamshire 5 44.64x
Middlesex 4 2.16x
Surrey 1 1.11x
Yorkshire 1 0.54x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Liverpool in Lancashire leads with 8 Takers recorded in 1881 and an index of 59.93x.

Place Total Index
Liverpool 8 59.93x
Princes Risborough 5 3333.33x
Bethnal Green London 2 24.84x
Enfield 2 163.93x
Ecclesall Bierlow 1 26.81x
Putney 1 119.05x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Taker surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 4
Bertha 1
Emma 1
Eva 1
Martha 1
Sarah 1
Selina 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Taker surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 2
John 2
William 2
Abraham 1
Henry 1
James 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Taker households.

FAQ

Taker surname: questions and answers

How common was the Taker surname in 1881?

In 1881, 19 people were recorded with the Taker surname. That placed it at #30,872 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Taker surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 98 in 2016. That gives Taker a modern rank of #31,470.

What does the Taker map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Taker bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.