NameCensus.

UK surname

Tayor

In the 1881 census there were 72 people recorded with the Tayor surname, ranking it #23,371 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 47, ranked #35,069, down from #23,371 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Putney, Bury and Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Tayor is 154 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 34.7%.

1881 census count

72

Ranked #23,371

Modern count

47

2016, ranked #35,069

Peak year

1891

154 bearers

Map years

2

1891 to 1901

Key insights

  • Tayor had 72 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,371 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 47 in 2016, ranked #35,069.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 154 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Tayor surname distribution map

The map shows where the Tayor surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Tayor surname density by area, 1901 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Tayor over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 77 #19,998
1861 historical 77 #23,975
1881 historical 72 #23,371
1891 historical 154 #18,004
1901 historical 111 #21,492
1911 historical 77 #25,106
1997 modern 62 #31,412
1998 modern 51 #32,816
1999 modern 52 #32,848
2000 modern 58 #32,317
2001 modern 19 #35,866
2002 modern 29 #35,030
2003 modern 29 #35,129
2004 modern 34 #34,868
2005 modern 38 #34,741
2006 modern 39 #34,932
2007 modern 39 #35,097
2008 modern 40 #35,137
2009 modern 43 #35,088
2010 modern 50 #34,833
2011 modern 45 #35,112
2012 modern 41 #35,328
2013 modern 44 #35,222
2014 modern 44 #35,241
2015 modern 45 #35,161
2016 modern 47 #35,069

Geography

Back to top

Where Tayors are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Putney, Bury, Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Dundee, Liff, Benvie and Invergowry and St Paul Deptford, St Nicholas Deptford. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Putney London (South Districts)
2 Bury Lancashire
3 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
4 Dundee, Liff, Benvie and Invergowry Forfar
5 St Paul Deptford, St Nicholas Deptford London (South Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Tayor

These lists show first names that appear often with the Tayor surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Tayor

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Tayor, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Tayor surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Tayor household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Tayor is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Tayor is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Tayor, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Tayor families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Tayor surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Lancashire leads with 11 Tayors recorded in 1881 and an index of 1.34x.

County Total Index
Lancashire 11 1.34x
Staffordshire 9 3.85x
Berkshire 8 15.39x
Yorkshire 8 1.17x
Nottinghamshire 7 7.50x
Aberdeenshire 5 7.80x
Cambridgeshire 4 9.12x
Middlesex 4 0.58x
Angus 2 3.12x
Derbyshire 2 1.85x
Devon 2 1.39x
Durham 2 0.97x
Denbighshire 1 3.82x
Glamorgan 1 0.83x
Hampshire 1 0.70x
Lincolnshire 1 0.90x
Surrey 1 0.30x
Warwickshire 1 0.57x
Worcestershire 1 1.11x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Reading St Giles in Berkshire leads with 8 Tayors recorded in 1881 and an index of 156.86x.

Place Total Index
Reading St Giles 8 156.86x
Stoke Upon Trent 6 24.21x
West Retford 6 3157.89x
Aberdeen St Nicholas 4 33.33x
Hulme 4 23.32x
St Andrewthe Less 4 79.84x
Armley 3 99.01x
Baildon 2 155.04x
Chorley 2 43.38x
Dundee 2 8.35x
Great Lumley 2 571.43x
Huddersfield 2 20.00x
Islington London 2 2.98x
Kensington London 2 5.20x
Ticknall 2 909.09x
Wigan 2 17.42x
Alverstoke 1 19.46x
Birmingham 1 1.72x
Burton Joyce 1 625.00x
Castle Church 1 71.43x
Chorlton On Medlock 1 7.66x
Fremington 1 344.83x
Gorton 1 12.95x
Great Malvern 1 52.91x
Haxey 1 212.77x
Lambeth 1 1.66x
Liverpool 1 2.00x
Llandyfodwg 1 147.06x
Longside 1 129.87x
Plymouth St Andrew 1 9.01x
Stone 1 33.44x
Upper Hallam 1 166.67x
Wolstanton Knutton 1 69.93x
Wrexham Regis 1 51.55x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Tayor surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Tayor surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 7
John 3
Robert 3
Edward 2
James 2
Alfred 1
Charies 1
Charles 1
Ernest 1
Frank 1
George 1
Gerald 1
Henry 1
Joseph 1
Richard 1
Starling 1
W.James 1

FAQ

Tayor surname: questions and answers

How common was the Tayor surname in 1881?

In 1881, 72 people were recorded with the Tayor surname. That placed it at #23,371 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Tayor surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 47 in 2016. That gives Tayor a modern rank of #35,069.

What does the Tayor map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Tayor bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.