NameCensus.

UK surname

Allies

In the 1881 census there were 72 people recorded with the Allies surname, ranking it #23,371 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 146, ranked #24,173, down from #23,371 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Worcester St John Bedwardine, Kenswick, Staines and Cambridge: St Andrew the Less, St Andrew the Great, Holy Trinity, St Benedict. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Worcester and Cotswold.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Allies is 162 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 102.8%.

1881 census count

72

Ranked #23,371

Modern count

146

2016, ranked #24,173

Peak year

1999

162 bearers

Map years

6

1891 to 2016

Key insights

  • Allies had 72 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #23,371 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 146 in 2016, ranked #24,173.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 116 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Allies surname distribution map

The map shows where the Allies surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Allies surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Allies over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 57 #23,092
1861 historical 38 #29,216
1881 historical 72 #23,371
1891 historical 102 #23,719
1901 historical 107 #21,955
1911 historical 116 #20,850
1997 modern 149 #21,214
1998 modern 153 #21,387
1999 modern 162 #20,781
2000 modern 154 #21,415
2001 modern 148 #21,664
2002 modern 150 #21,913
2003 modern 149 #21,766
2004 modern 154 #21,432
2005 modern 147 #22,057
2006 modern 144 #22,520
2007 modern 138 #23,478
2008 modern 143 #23,160
2009 modern 142 #23,791
2010 modern 150 #23,482
2011 modern 146 #23,736
2012 modern 138 #24,614
2013 modern 136 #25,252
2014 modern 140 #24,977
2015 modern 137 #25,226
2016 modern 146 #24,173

Geography

Back to top

Where Allies' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Worcester St John Bedwardine, Kenswick, Staines, Cambridge: St Andrew the Less, St Andrew the Great, Holy Trinity, St Benedict, Tetbury and Bromsgrove, Upton Warren. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Worcester and Cotswold. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Worcester St John Bedwardine, Kenswick Worcestershire
2 Staines Middlesex (Exclusive Of London Districts)
3 Cambridge: St Andrew the Less, St Andrew the Great, Holy Trinity, St Benedict Cambridgeshire
4 Tetbury Gloucestershire
5 Bromsgrove, Upton Warren Worcestershire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Worcester 005 Worcester
2 Worcester 002 Worcester
3 Worcester 009 Worcester
4 Cotswold 011 Cotswold
5 Worcester 010 Worcester

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Allies

These lists show first names that appear often with the Allies surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Allies

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Allies, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Allies surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Allies household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Allies is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Allies is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Allies falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Allies is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Allies, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Allies families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Allies surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Worcestershire leads with 34 Allies' recorded in 1881 and an index of 37.07x.

County Total Index
Worcestershire 34 37.07x
Middlesex 9 1.28x
Herefordshire 8 27.78x
Suffolk 7 8.18x
Yorkshire 4 0.57x
Norfolk 3 2.78x
Warwickshire 3 1.69x
Kirkcudbrightshire 1 9.83x
Lancashire 1 0.12x
Lincolnshire 1 0.89x
Staffordshire 1 0.42x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Flyford Flavell in Worcestershire leads with 8 Allies' recorded in 1881 and an index of 20000.00x.

Place Total Index
Flyford Flavell 8 20000.00x
Worcester St Swithin 8 4705.88x
Long Melford 7 875.00x
Bromyard 5 1315.79x
Claines 5 198.41x
St Marylebone London 4 10.67x
Avenbury 3 3000.00x
Great Yarmouth 3 33.56x
Leeds 3 7.63x
Paddington London 3 11.62x
Wichenford 3 3333.33x
Worcester Blockhouse 3 600.00x
Worcester St Nicholas 3 697.67x
Isleworth 2 64.10x
Stratford On Avon 2 204.08x
Worcester St Martin 2 161.29x
Ecclesall Bierlow 1 7.06x
Kirkcudbright 1 119.05x
Old Stratford 1 100.00x
Overbury 1 625.00x
Stamford St Michael 1 312.50x
West Derby 1 4.10x
Wolverhampton 1 5.49x
Worcester St Peter 1 57.47x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Allies surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Allies surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Allies surname: questions and answers

How common was the Allies surname in 1881?

In 1881, 72 people were recorded with the Allies surname. That placed it at #23,371 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Allies surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 146 in 2016. That gives Allies a modern rank of #24,173.

What does the Allies map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Allies bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.