NameCensus.

UK surname

Ashbourne

In the 1881 census there were 121 people recorded with the Ashbourne surname, ranking it #17,671 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 204, ranked #19,320, down from #17,671 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Burton-on-Trent, Redruth and Dalton-in-Furness. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Stockton-on-Tees, Greenwich and Wolverhampton.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Ashbourne is 229 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 68.6%.

1881 census count

121

Ranked #17,671

Modern count

204

2016, ranked #19,320

Peak year

2010

229 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Ashbourne had 121 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,671 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 204 in 2016, ranked #19,320.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 197 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Ageing Communities.

Ashbourne surname distribution map

The map shows where the Ashbourne surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Ashbourne surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Ashbourne over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 37 #26,673
1861 historical 157 #14,732
1881 historical 121 #17,671
1891 historical 197 #15,101
1901 historical 146 #18,335
1911 historical 156 #17,421
1997 modern 193 #18,035
1998 modern 191 #18,624
1999 modern 212 #17,611
2000 modern 192 #18,683
2001 modern 195 #18,215
2002 modern 194 #18,651
2003 modern 200 #18,139
2004 modern 201 #18,168
2005 modern 212 #17,473
2006 modern 204 #18,051
2007 modern 208 #18,013
2008 modern 208 #18,171
2009 modern 218 #18,015
2010 modern 229 #17,805
2011 modern 218 #18,206
2012 modern 215 #18,304
2013 modern 212 #18,820
2014 modern 219 #18,523
2015 modern 206 #19,208
2016 modern 204 #19,320

Geography

Back to top

Where Ashbournes are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Burton-on-Trent, Redruth, Dalton-in-Furness, Warwick St Mary and Bulkington,Wolvey, Burton Hastings (Burbage, Leicestershire). These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Stockton-on-Tees, Greenwich, Wolverhampton, Shropshire and Neath Port Talbot. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Burton-on-Trent Staffordshire
2 Redruth Cornwall
3 Dalton-in-Furness Lancashire
4 Warwick St Mary Warwickshire
5 Bulkington,Wolvey, Burton Hastings (Burbage, Leicestershire) Warwickshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Stockton-on-Tees 021 Stockton-on-Tees
2 Greenwich 020 Greenwich
3 Wolverhampton 018 Wolverhampton
4 Shropshire 027 Shropshire
5 Neath Port Talbot 010 Neath Port Talbot

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Ashbourne

These lists show first names that appear often with the Ashbourne surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Ashbourne

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Ashbourne, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Ageing Communities

Nationally, the Ashbourne surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Ageing Communities, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Ashbourne household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many residents are of normal retirement age or above and live in communal establishments, and there are few dependent children. The dominant property type is a mix of retirement flats and detached houses. Those in work are likely to be employed in managerial and professional occupations, and many residents are educated to degree level. Levels of owner occupation are high, but the private rental sector is also present. Rural locations predominate.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Ashbourne is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Ashbourne is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Ashbourne falls in decile 5 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

5
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Ashbourne is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Ashbourne, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Ashbourne families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Ashbourne surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Warwickshire leads with 38 Ashbournes recorded in 1881 and an index of 12.77x.

County Total Index
Warwickshire 38 12.77x
Staffordshire 19 4.77x
Surrey 15 2.61x
Middlesex 14 1.19x
Lancashire 12 0.86x
Cornwall 8 5.99x
Cumberland 7 6.89x
Hampshire 3 1.24x
Leicestershire 1 0.76x
Lincolnshire 1 0.53x
Northamptonshire 1 0.90x
Nottinghamshire 1 0.63x
Worcestershire 1 0.65x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Lambeth in Surrey leads with 11 Ashbournes recorded in 1881 and an index of 10.69x.

Place Total Index
Lambeth 11 10.69x
Birmingham 9 9.07x
Redruth 8 211.64x
Ashton Under Lyne 7 22.87x
Burton Upon Trent 7 75.11x
Warwick St Mary 6 232.56x
Binley 5 6250.00x
Clerkenwell London 5 17.95x
Horninglow 5 265.96x
Coventry Holy Trinity 4 44.99x
Crosscanonby 4 119.05x
Paddington London 4 9.22x
Stoke Upon Trent 4 9.47x
Willenhall 4 8000.00x
Bulkington 3 468.75x
Burton Extra 3 131.58x
Liverpool 3 3.53x
Portsea 3 6.33x
St Cuthbert W O 3 60.61x
Aston 2 2.44x
Battersea 2 4.61x
Coventry St Michael 2 20.92x
St George Hanover Square 2 9.62x
St Marylebone London 2 3.17x
Basford 1 13.64x
Bedworth 1 46.08x
Camberwell 1 1.33x
Crumpsall 1 30.30x
Edmonton 1 10.52x
Hatton 1 256.41x
Kirkdale 1 4.24x
Leamington Priors 1 13.66x
Leicester St Margaret 1 3.13x
Northfield 1 34.25x
Penge 1 13.26x
Spittlegate 1 38.31x
Syresham 1 312.50x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Ashbourne surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 10
Mary 8
Sarah 6
Alice 4
Ellen 4
Ann 3
Emily 3
Dinah 2
Emma 2
Hannah 2
Harriet 2
Jane 2
Lucy 2
Matilda 2
Agnes 1
Anne 1
Betsy 1
Cherry 1
Fannie 1
Fanny 1
Hellen 1
Janetta 1
Julia 1
Kate 1
Laura 1
Louisa 1
Martha 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Ashbourne surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 8
Joseph 6
Charles 5
George 5
John 5
Thomas 4
Edward 3
Ernest 2
Frederick 2
A. 1
Alfred 1
Arthur 1
Aurthur 1
Francis 1
Henry 1
Hubert 1
James 1
Vernon 1
Walter 1
Willie 1
Wm. 1
Wm.Chas. 1

FAQ

Ashbourne surname: questions and answers

How common was the Ashbourne surname in 1881?

In 1881, 121 people were recorded with the Ashbourne surname. That placed it at #17,671 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Ashbourne surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 204 in 2016. That gives Ashbourne a modern rank of #19,320.

What does the Ashbourne map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Ashbourne bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.