NameCensus.

UK surname

Bagaley

In the 1881 census there were 98 people recorded with the Bagaley surname, ranking it #19,999 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 6, ranked #38,110, down from #19,999 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Wolverhampton, Prestbury and Woodborough. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Bagaley is 241 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 93.9%.

1881 census count

98

Ranked #19,999

Modern count

6

2016, ranked #38,110

Peak year

1861

241 bearers

Map years

3

1851 to 1891

Key insights

  • Bagaley had 98 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #19,999 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 6 in 2016, ranked #38,110.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 241 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Bagaley surname distribution map

The map shows where the Bagaley surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Bagaley surname density by area, 1891 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Bagaley over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 127 #14,547
1861 historical 241 #10,192
1881 historical 98 #19,999
1891 historical 122 #21,053
1901 historical 64 #27,010
1911 historical 71 #25,742
1997 modern 6 #37,704
1998 modern 6 #37,703
1999 modern 5 #37,872
2000 modern 7 #37,430
2001 modern 7 #37,293
2002 modern 7 #37,379
2003 modern 7 #37,397
2004 modern 6 #37,655
2005 modern 5 #37,885
2006 modern 6 #37,788
2007 modern 9 #37,435
2008 modern 9 #37,473
2009 modern 10 #37,446
2010 modern 10 #37,517
2011 modern 5 #38,168
2012 modern 6 #38,008
2013 modern 6 #38,049
2014 modern 6 #38,077
2015 modern 6 #38,076
2016 modern 6 #38,110

Geography

Back to top

Where Bagaleys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Wolverhampton, Prestbury, Woodborough, Norwell and Manchester. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Wolverhampton Staffordshire
2 Prestbury Cheshire
3 Woodborough Nottinghamshire
4 Norwell Nottinghamshire
5 Manchester Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Bagaley

These lists show first names that appear often with the Bagaley surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Bagaley

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Bagaley, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Bagaley surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Bagaley household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Bagaley is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Bagaley is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
Other Ethnic Group

This describes the area pattern most associated with Bagaley, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Bagaley families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Bagaley surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Nottinghamshire leads with 24 Bagaleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 18.82x.

County Total Index
Nottinghamshire 24 18.82x
Cheshire 16 7.66x
Staffordshire 12 3.76x
Leicestershire 9 8.58x
Yorkshire 9 0.96x
Surrey 8 1.74x
Lancashire 5 0.45x
Derbyshire 4 2.70x
Lincolnshire 4 2.64x
Middlesex 3 0.32x
Northumberland 2 1.42x
Worcestershire 1 0.81x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Burton Joyce in Nottinghamshire leads with 9 Bagaleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 4090.91x.

Place Total Index
Burton Joyce 9 4090.91x
Wolverhampton 9 36.66x
Castle Northwich 8 1159.42x
Horton In Bradford 8 54.64x
Reigate Foreign 8 160.32x
Loughborough 7 147.06x
Mansfield 6 136.05x
Witton Cum Twambrooks 5 268.82x
Carlton Upon Trent 4 6666.67x
Scopwick 4 3076.92x
Lapley 3 1250.00x
Parr 3 74.63x
Derby St Werburgh 2 23.39x
St George Hanover Square 2 12.00x
Staveley 2 76.05x
Syston 2 204.08x
Altrincham 1 27.40x
Bulwell 1 36.10x
Comberbach 1 1000.00x
Cottingham 1 49.51x
Cromwell 1 2000.00x
East Markham 1 416.67x
Kings Norton 1 9.03x
Manchester 1 1.98x
Nether Peover 1 1428.57x
Nottingham St Mary 1 3.03x
St Pancras London 1 1.31x
Thurgarton 1 909.09x
Tynemouth 1 13.26x
Westgate 1 11.47x
Wigan 1 6.37x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Bagaley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 12
Ellen 4
Elizabeth 3
Eliza 2
Ethel 2
Jane 2
Sarah 2
Ada 1
Catherine 1
Deborah 1
Dinah 1
Edith 1
Elizth. 1
Elizth.Ann 1
Emma 1
Florance 1
Frances 1
Hannah 1
Hannh. 1
Jemmia 1
Julia 1
Kate 1
Louisa 1
Lucy 1
Rose 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Bagaley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 11
Joseph 10
Charles 3
George 3
James 3
John 3
Thomas 3
Edward 2
Bacherius 1
Benjamin 1
David 1
Earnest 1
Edwd. 1
Everat 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
Fredrick 1
Hannam 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
Jno.Hy. 1
Sidney 1

FAQ

Bagaley surname: questions and answers

How common was the Bagaley surname in 1881?

In 1881, 98 people were recorded with the Bagaley surname. That placed it at #19,999 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Bagaley surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 6 in 2016. That gives Bagaley a modern rank of #38,110.

What does the Bagaley map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Bagaley bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.