NameCensus.

UK surname

Batting

In the 1881 census there were 162 people recorded with the Batting surname, ranking it #14,746 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 125, ranked #26,827, down from #14,746 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Newton St Cyre and Beaconsfield. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Wycombe, Mid Devon and Slough.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Batting is 221 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 22.8%.

1881 census count

162

Ranked #14,746

Modern count

125

2016, ranked #26,827

Peak year

1891

221 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Batting had 162 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,746 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 125 in 2016, ranked #26,827.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 221 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Batting surname distribution map

The map shows where the Batting surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Batting surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Batting over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 110 #16,093
1861 historical 214 #11,365
1881 historical 162 #14,746
1891 historical 221 #13,897
1901 historical 177 #16,342
1911 historical 175 #16,246
1997 modern 129 #23,143
1998 modern 133 #23,308
1999 modern 140 #22,789
2000 modern 134 #23,358
2001 modern 133 #23,132
2002 modern 143 #22,595
2003 modern 135 #23,155
2004 modern 130 #23,902
2005 modern 129 #23,963
2006 modern 126 #24,493
2007 modern 125 #24,987
2008 modern 123 #25,505
2009 modern 127 #25,564
2010 modern 117 #27,557
2011 modern 117 #27,334
2012 modern 128 #25,852
2013 modern 129 #26,211
2014 modern 129 #26,352
2015 modern 126 #26,654
2016 modern 125 #26,827

Geography

Back to top

Where Battings are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Newton St Cyre, Beaconsfield and Upton Pyne, Bramford Speke. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Wycombe, Mid Devon, Slough and South Bucks. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 London parishes London 3
3 Newton St Cyre Devon
4 Beaconsfield Buckinghamshire
5 Upton Pyne, Bramford Speke Devon

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Wycombe 001 Wycombe
2 Mid Devon 006 Mid Devon
3 Slough 001 Slough
4 South Bucks 005 South Bucks
5 Wycombe 003 Wycombe

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Batting

These lists show first names that appear often with the Batting surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Batting

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Batting, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Batting surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Batting household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, Batting is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Batting is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Batting falls in decile 8 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

8
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Batting is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Batting, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Batting families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Batting surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Buckinghamshire leads with 42 Battings recorded in 1881 and an index of 46.86x.

County Total Index
Buckinghamshire 42 46.86x
Middlesex 36 2.43x
Devon 32 10.37x
Surrey 14 1.94x
Cornwall 8 4.77x
Glamorgan 5 1.94x
Hampshire 5 1.65x
Kent 4 0.79x
Gloucestershire 2 0.69x
Hertfordshire 2 1.96x
Essex 1 0.34x
Sussex 1 0.40x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Great Marlow in Buckinghamshire leads with 18 Battings recorded in 1881 and an index of 743.80x.

Place Total Index
Great Marlow 18 743.80x
Beaconsfield 11 1325.30x
Falmouth 8 134.68x
Hendon 8 150.09x
Exeter St Mary Major 6 322.58x
Fulham London 6 27.91x
Aberdare 5 28.22x
Clerkenwell London 5 14.29x
Exeter St Pancras 5 3125.00x
Oxted 5 574.71x
Bledlow 4 740.74x
Chilton Candover 4 5000.00x
Hackney London 4 4.81x
Islington London 4 2.78x
Newton St Cyres 4 930.23x
Princes Risborough 4 333.33x
Tedburn St Mary 4 1212.12x
Upton Pyne 4 1904.76x
Wycombe 4 59.88x
Camberwell 3 3.17x
Newington 3 5.48x
Silverton 3 468.75x
Tonbridge 3 16.45x
Bovey Tracey 2 185.19x
Brampford Speke 2 800.00x
Bristol St James St Paul 2 20.62x
Kensington London 2 2.43x
St George Hanover Square 2 7.66x
Battersea 1 1.83x
Dunsford 1 256.41x
Exeter St Thomas The 1 31.75x
Hammersmith London 1 2.74x
Hanwell 1 38.02x
Hertford All Saints 1 175.44x
Kingsclere 1 71.94x
Littlehampton 1 50.00x
Sevenoaks 1 24.39x
Southwark St George Martyr 1 3.35x
St Andrew Holborn London 1 15.58x
St Pancras London 1 0.84x
Streatham 1 9.09x
Tottenham 1 4.24x
Wanstead 1 19.49x
Watford 1 12.63x
West Wycombe 1 81.97x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Batting surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Batting surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 12
William 11
Thomas 7
Henry 5
Charles 4
James 4
Alfred 3
Edward 3
Frank 3
Robert 3
George 2
Walter 2
Aide 1
Ambrose 1
Arthur 1
Aurther 1
Cyril 1
Frederick 1
Harry 1
Joseph 1
Louis 1
Mark 1
Richard 1
Rupert 1
Samuel 1
Thos.G. 1
Timothy 1
Tom 1

FAQ

Batting surname: questions and answers

How common was the Batting surname in 1881?

In 1881, 162 people were recorded with the Batting surname. That placed it at #14,746 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Batting surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 125 in 2016. That gives Batting a modern rank of #26,827.

What does the Batting map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Batting bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.