NameCensus.

UK surname

Bayford

In the 1881 census there were 380 people recorded with the Bayford surname, ranking it #8,249 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 695, ranked #7,750, up from #8,249 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Paddington and Hallingbury, Little. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include East Hertfordshire, Uttlesford and Wiltshire.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Bayford is 736 in 2002. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 82.9%.

1881 census count

380

Ranked #8,249

Modern count

695

2016, ranked #7,750

Peak year

2002

736 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Bayford had 380 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #8,249 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 695 in 2016, ranked #7,750.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 624 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Bayford surname distribution map

The map shows where the Bayford surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Bayford surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Bayford over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 328 #7,098
1861 historical 369 #6,919
1881 historical 380 #8,249
1891 historical 432 #8,311
1901 historical 521 #7,811
1911 historical 624 #6,636
1997 modern 686 #7,359
1998 modern 720 #7,315
1999 modern 728 #7,302
2000 modern 727 #7,282
2001 modern 725 #7,162
2002 modern 736 #7,212
2003 modern 724 #7,192
2004 modern 731 #7,155
2005 modern 729 #7,107
2006 modern 720 #7,201
2007 modern 724 #7,250
2008 modern 732 #7,244
2009 modern 736 #7,358
2010 modern 736 #7,479
2011 modern 723 #7,512
2012 modern 705 #7,562
2013 modern 710 #7,647
2014 modern 710 #7,687
2015 modern 702 #7,699
2016 modern 695 #7,750

Geography

Back to top

Where Bayfords are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Paddington, Hallingbury, Little and Pelham, Furneux. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to East Hertfordshire, Uttlesford, Wiltshire and Huntingdonshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Paddington London (West Districts)
3 London parishes London 3
4 Hallingbury, Little Hertfordshire
5 Pelham, Furneux Hertfordshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 East Hertfordshire 009 East Hertfordshire
2 Uttlesford 002 Uttlesford
3 Wiltshire 060 Wiltshire
4 Uttlesford 009 Uttlesford
5 Huntingdonshire 021 Huntingdonshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Bayford

These lists show first names that appear often with the Bayford surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Bayford

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Bayford, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Bayford surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Bayford household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Bayford is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Bayford is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Bayford falls in decile 4 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

4
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Bayford is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Bayford, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Bayford families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Bayford surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 120 Bayfords recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.23x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 120 3.23x
Hertfordshire 93 36.30x
Essex 88 11.99x
Yorkshire 17 0.46x
Surrey 14 0.77x
Kent 9 0.71x
Gloucestershire 8 1.10x
Sussex 8 1.28x
Staffordshire 6 0.48x
Northamptonshire 5 1.43x
Hampshire 3 0.39x
Norfolk 3 0.53x
Lincolnshire 2 0.34x
Channel Islands 1 0.91x
Glamorgan 1 0.15x
Lancashire 1 0.02x
Oxfordshire 1 0.44x
Warwickshire 1 0.11x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Furneux Pelham in Hertfordshire leads with 27 Bayfords recorded in 1881 and an index of 3698.63x.

Place Total Index
Furneux Pelham 27 3698.63x
Paddington London 27 19.76x
Great Burstead 19 711.61x
Bishop Stortford 13 151.87x
Little Hallingbury 13 1756.76x
Farnham 11 1718.75x
St Pancras London 11 3.68x
Barnsley 10 26.32x
Edmonton 10 33.39x
Harlow 10 316.46x
Little Hadham 9 825.69x
Boddington 8 1538.46x
Great Hadham 8 484.85x
Hove 8 29.10x
Kensington London 8 3.87x
Mile End Old Town London 8 10.11x
Hackney London 7 3.36x
Southwark St George Martyr 7 9.36x
Waltham Holy Cross 7 102.04x
Wheathampstead 7 236.49x
Childerditch 6 2142.86x
Enfield 6 24.60x
Albury 5 625.00x
Peterborough 5 19.76x
Walsall Foreign 5 7.72x
Walthamstow 5 18.93x
Watford 5 25.18x
Brent Pelham 4 1333.33x
Islington London 4 1.11x
Sawbridgeworth 4 103.09x
Shoreditch London 4 2.48x
Theydon Garnon 4 238.10x
Tottenham 4 6.76x
Bethnal Green London 3 1.86x
Bromley 3 15.52x
Bromley London 3 3.67x
Camberwell 3 1.26x
Cheshunt 3 33.48x
Hornsey 3 6.38x
St Andrew Holborn 3 23.81x
St Marylebone London 3 1.51x
Swaffham 3 64.52x
Thundridge 3 500.00x
Aldershot 2 7.84x
Broxbourne 2 39.37x
Catterton 2 3333.33x
Chelsea London 2 1.79x
Clerkenwell London 2 2.28x
Epworth 2 72.20x
Little Burstead 2 800.00x
Prittlewell 2 19.67x
Spofforth Cum Stockeld 2 344.83x
St Albans St Peter 2 23.15x
St George Hanover Square 2 3.05x
St Giles In Fields London 2 10.97x
Swillington 2 190.48x
Thaxted 2 82.30x
Albury 1 60.61x
Beckenham 1 6.03x
Cranham 1 188.68x
Cuddington 1 142.86x
East Ham 1 7.34x
Ewell 1 26.18x
Fulham London 1 1.86x
Grouville 1 32.57x
Laindon 1 243.90x
Lambeth 1 0.31x
Lee 1 5.43x
Milton In Gravesend 1 5.26x
Minster In Sheppey 1 4.76x
Norwood 1 11.76x
Odiham 1 29.94x
Rugby 1 7.89x
Rugeley 1 11.11x
St Clement Eastcheap 1 909.09x
St George Bloomsbury 1 4.69x
Stoke Newington London 1 3.45x
Stokenchurch 1 48.78x
Westminster St John 1 2.21x
Westwick 1 5000.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Bayford surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 27
Elizabeth 13
Sarah 13
Jane 12
Alice 9
Emily 9
Ellen 7
Emma 7
Eliza 6
Martha 6
Ada 5
Ann 5
Caroline 4
Charlotte 4
Louisa 4
Catherine 3
Florence 3
Harriet 3
Margaret 3
Susan 3
Annie 2
Edith 2
Isabella 2
Kate 2
Lucy 2
Lydia 2
Mable 2
Rosa 2
Susannah 2
Victoria 2
Betsy 1
Clara 1
Eliz. 1
Elizebth. 1
Ellenea 1
Fanny 1
Gertrude 1
Hannah 1
Helen 1
Hep. 1
Isabel 1
Keturah 1
Keziah 1
Laura 1
Leila 1
Linda 1
Louise 1
Mabel 1
Maria 1
Marian 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Bayford surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 29
George 21
John 18
Charles 10
James 10
Henry 8
Thomas 7
Alfred 6
Edward 6
Joseph 6
Arthur 5
Albert 4
Harry 4
Frederick 3
Robert 3
Walter 3
Edwin 2
Agustus 1
Amos 1
Bengman 1
Benjamin 1
Chas. 1
Cyril 1
Daniel 1
David 1
Edmund 1
Ernest 1
Francis 1
Fredk. 1
Fredrick 1
Geo. 1
Herbert 1
Jas. 1
Jesse 1
Johnathan 1
Joshua 1
Leonard 1
Levi 1
Mason 1
Noah 1
Peter 1
Reuben 1
Samuel 1
Sidney 1
Stephen 1
Wiliam 1
Will 1
Wm.T.H. 1

FAQ

Bayford surname: questions and answers

How common was the Bayford surname in 1881?

In 1881, 380 people were recorded with the Bayford surname. That placed it at #8,249 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Bayford surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 695 in 2016. That gives Bayford a modern rank of #7,750.

What does the Bayford map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Bayford bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.