NameCensus.

UK surname

Binding

In the 1881 census there were 234 people recorded with the Binding surname, ranking it #11,607 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 714, ranked #7,599, up from #11,607 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos), Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff and Bedminster. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include West Somerset, Taunton Deane and Rhondda Cynon Taf.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Binding is 771 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 205.1%.

1881 census count

234

Ranked #11,607

Modern count

714

2016, ranked #7,599

Peak year

2010

771 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Binding had 234 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #11,607 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 714 in 2016, ranked #7,599.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 555 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Binding surname distribution map

The map shows where the Binding surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Binding surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Binding over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 150 #12,905
1861 historical 146 #15,628
1881 historical 234 #11,607
1891 historical 355 #9,721
1901 historical 436 #8,907
1911 historical 555 #7,231
1997 modern 706 #7,201
1998 modern 716 #7,347
1999 modern 717 #7,385
2000 modern 727 #7,282
2001 modern 720 #7,204
2002 modern 730 #7,255
2003 modern 724 #7,192
2004 modern 700 #7,400
2005 modern 698 #7,369
2006 modern 698 #7,366
2007 modern 698 #7,432
2008 modern 710 #7,396
2009 modern 741 #7,319
2010 modern 771 #7,234
2011 modern 748 #7,322
2012 modern 713 #7,499
2013 modern 733 #7,470
2014 modern 729 #7,543
2015 modern 716 #7,591
2016 modern 714 #7,599

Geography

Back to top

Where Bindings are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos), Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Bedminster, St Decuman, Nettlecombe, Old Cleeve, Kilton, Lilstock, Dodington, Stringston, Holford and Stogursey. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to West Somerset, Taunton Deane and Rhondda Cynon Taf. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Ystradyfodwg (incl. Rhigos) Glamorganshire
2 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
3 Bedminster Somerset
4 St Decuman, Nettlecombe, Old Cleeve, Kilton, Lilstock, Dodington, Stringston, Holford Somerset
5 Stogursey Somerset

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 West Somerset 003 West Somerset
2 Taunton Deane 007 Taunton Deane
3 Taunton Deane 013 Taunton Deane
4 West Somerset 002 West Somerset
5 Rhondda Cynon Taf 028 Rhondda Cynon Taf

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Binding

These lists show first names that appear often with the Binding surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Binding

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Binding, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Binding surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Binding household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Binding is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Binding is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Binding falls in decile 4 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

4
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Binding is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Binding, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Binding families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Binding surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Somerset leads with 135 Bindings recorded in 1881 and an index of 36.74x.

County Total Index
Somerset 135 36.74x
Gloucestershire 23 5.14x
Glamorgan 16 4.03x
Monmouthshire 12 7.27x
Middlesex 11 0.48x
Durham 10 1.47x
Surrey 5 0.45x
Sussex 5 1.30x
Cheshire 4 0.79x
Devon 4 0.84x
Lancashire 4 0.15x
Leicestershire 2 0.79x
Lincolnshire 2 0.55x
Dorset 1 0.67x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Stogursey in Somerset leads with 20 Bindings recorded in 1881 and an index of 2020.20x.

Place Total Index
Stogursey 20 2020.20x
Bedminster 14 40.56x
Spaxton 12 1666.67x
St Decumans Watchet 12 1290.32x
Williton 12 975.61x
Penshaw 10 490.20x
Bishops Lydeard 9 957.45x
Charlinch 9 5625.00x
Merthyr Tydfil 9 23.56x
Newland 8 212.77x
St Woollos 8 43.45x
Cannington 7 642.20x
Bleadon 6 1250.00x
Bristol St Paul In 6 50.29x
Horfield 6 133.33x
Selworthy 6 1875.00x
Uphill 6 1200.00x
Bridgewater 5 50.15x
Eglwysilan 5 72.46x
West Hoathly 5 413.22x
Clevedon 4 104.71x
Kingston On Thames 4 14.97x
Mile End Old Town London 4 8.23x
Norbury 4 341.88x
Pendlebury 3 52.45x
Trevethin 3 19.26x
Bristol St George 2 9.66x
Congresbury 2 215.05x
East Stonehouse 2 21.37x
Great Grimsby 2 8.64x
Humberstone 2 96.15x
Islington London 2 0.90x
Stogumber 2 206.19x
Aberdare 1 3.67x
Banwell 1 74.63x
Bristol St James St Paul 1 6.70x
Cardiff St Mary 1 4.57x
Clerkenwell London 1 1.86x
Devonport 1 18.32x
Fiddington 1 526.32x
North Petherton 1 33.78x
Otterhampton 1 526.32x
Pendleton In Salford 1 3.10x
Pilton 1 113.64x
Risca 1 32.15x
Sherborne 1 22.68x
Southwark St Saviour 1 8.53x
St George Hanover Square 1 2.49x
St Marylebone London 1 0.82x
Stockland Bristol 1 666.67x
Stoke Damerel 1 3.01x
Thurloxton 1 769.23x
Westminster St John 1 3.60x
Westminster St Margaret 1 9.08x
Weston Super Mare 1 10.78x
Westonsuper Mare 1 133.33x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Binding surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 13
Mary 11
Sarah 8
Emma 6
Alice 5
Ann 5
Emily 5
Ellen 4
Hannah 4
Harriet 4
Martha 4
Annie 3
Caroline 3
Harriett 3
Jane 3
Louisa 3
Rosina 3
Selina 3
Clara 2
Maria 2
Abagel 1
Agnes 1
Catherine 1
Charlotte 1
Delia 1
Dina 1
Edda 1
Eiktia 1
Elizth.J. 1
Julia 1
Laura 1
Lizzie 1
Lydia 1
Margaret 1
Marianne 1
Matilda 1
Minnie 1
Ruth 1
Selena 1
Sophia 1
Sophy 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Binding surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 20
John 16
James 13
Henry 10
George 7
Edwin 6
Robert 6
Alfred 5
Thomas 4
Albert 3
Charles 3
Edward 3
Joseph 3
Samuel 3
Edmund 2
Walter 2
Alfd. 1
Charlie 1
Christopher 1
Edwd. 1
Elias 1
Enoch 1
Evan 1
Fred 1
Philip 1
Reuben 1
Tom 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Binding surname: questions and answers

How common was the Binding surname in 1881?

In 1881, 234 people were recorded with the Binding surname. That placed it at #11,607 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Binding surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 714 in 2016. That gives Binding a modern rank of #7,599.

What does the Binding map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Binding bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.